Aswath,

Assuming your data was obtained experimentally, even if it was indeed “100% 
accurate” (which is arguably an incorrect statement and no fallacious appeal to 
authority will fix that) you still have the issue of all the other modeling 
data being just an approximation to the real phenomenon.  For example, was your 
object a perfect cylinder? Do you know its exact mass?  Can you guarantee that 
the material was perfectly homogeneous so that your moments of inertia are 
exact?  Was the gravitational acceleration exactly 9.81 m/s2? Etc., etc. These 
are all rhetorical questions: the answer to every one of them is no.

Having said that, one can still set up a good simulation model and use it for 
meaningful predictions.  But with care.

For instance, you expect your object to “not fall”.  Why is that?  Supposedly 
because in the experiment it was precented to do so, either through a joint or 
else through contact (i.e., your cylinder was resting on a support).  Why then 
do you not model that part of the experiment?  With Chrono (and many other 
multibody simulation packages) you could model either case.

Alternatively, if you are only interested in this oscillatory motion you are 
trying to reproduce in simulation, why not ignore gravity altogether?  Set g=0 
in your Chrono simulation and do not apply any of the vertical forces from your 
dataset (you may also need to take care of some moments, but that depends on 
how the cylinder is kept from falling in the actual experiment – see above).

Speaking of this vertical force: you say the data is 100% accurate while 
claiming the cylinder should not fall.  Yet, glancing at your data, I see that 
the vertical force is not constant…

One last thing: everything I said above is based on some guesses I had to make 
as to what you are actually trying to model. All I’m saying is that you need to 
go through a process of understanding your experiment, understanding what you 
want to model (what is important), and understand all assumptions and 
approximations inherent in any mathematical modeling.

--Radu

From: Aswath Narayanan R.R.B na20b009 <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, June 24, 2022 3:36 AM
To: Radu Serban <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [chrono] Query reg Cylinder rotation

I am trying to simulate a cylinder's response to the force and moment dataset i 
am passing. The dataset I am passing is 100% accurate as it's verified on a 
thesis. The expected outcome of the cylinder is Simple harmonic oscillation but 
it's falling down as I had shown in the other video. I am sending my entire 
code and dataset.

On Wed, Jun 22, 2022 at 5:53 PM 'Radu Serban' via ProjectChrono 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Aswath,

A few things:

  *   Please provide a more detailed description of *what* you are trying to 
model.  None of your posts makes that clear; you talk about a cylinder, but 
don’t say anything if it is joined in any way, what kind of forces are supposed 
to act on it, etc, etc
  *   Please keep all messages related to the same issue/question in a single 
email thread.  Reply to your own post if you need to add information
  *   If you decide to provide code, please

     *   Provide the full code, including the important parts related to what 
you model
     *   Attach code as text, not images.  Someone may want to test the code 
you provide, but nobody will retype everything from a picture

So, please provide full information on what it is you are trying to model and 
simulate with Chrono and I’m sure someone will be able to help you

--Radu

From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> On 
Behalf Of Aswath Narayanan R.R.B na20b009
Sent: Monday, June 20, 2022 4:12 AM
To: ProjectChrono 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Subject: [chrono] Query reg Cylinder rotation

My dataset is accurate and The data for moments makes it effectively oscillate 
which has been experimentally tested.  I am trying to simulate the same but am 
not successful it in chrono. I don't know where I am going wrong. What methods 
am I supposed to use? I am declaring cylinder as a rigid body and I have 
attached the code for the same
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"ProjectChrono" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/projectchrono/52f4b435-8863-40c4-9a16-c56c0a21fec5n%40googlegroups.com<https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/projectchrono/52f4b435-8863-40c4-9a16-c56c0a21fec5n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"ProjectChrono" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/projectchrono/PH0PR06MB8237F6FFB297176B167F5C2FA7B29%40PH0PR06MB8237.namprd06.prod.outlook.com<https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/projectchrono/PH0PR06MB8237F6FFB297176B167F5C2FA7B29%40PH0PR06MB8237.namprd06.prod.outlook.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"ProjectChrono" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/projectchrono/PH0PR06MB82375DFF40790AB01470FF9DA7B69%40PH0PR06MB8237.namprd06.prod.outlook.com.

Reply via email to