Hi,

To my understanding, the size distribution of lunar regolith particles (or 
at least a reasonable DEM representation of that) does not span 12+ orders 
of magnitude: That is like the difference between an atom and a mountain. 
Papers 
from NASA 
<https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022489810000388#fig3> 
show about 2 orders of magnitude of difference. You have little hope of 
simulating 12+ orders of magnitude in Chrono either. Neither the force 
model nor the numerical resolution will be sufficient.

Chrono DEM-Engine is able to handle 2 orders of magnitude of particle size 
difference though, or even a bit more than that. The performance impact 
should be minimal as Chrono DEM-Engine tried to hide the cost of contact 
detection which is affected by particle size discrepancy more. We have a 
related paper here 
<https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00366-023-01921-9> doing a 
similar task.

Thank you,
Ruochun


On Thursday, May 30, 2024 at 7:23:46 AM UTC+8 [email protected] wrote:

> Hello again all! My project involves simulating a granular material, 
> specifically lunar regolith, which has a particle size distribution that 
> spans 12+ orders of magnitude. Based on what I've seen from other studies, 
> there are limitations on just how wide a DEM model's particle size 
> distribution can (I assume in order to maintain numerical stability but do 
> not actually know for sure).
>
> Does anyone have information or experience in dealing with wide particle 
> size distributions in Chrono? I am trying to understand and explain 
> limitations and possible ways around them. Thanks in advance!
>
>
> Best,
> Jared Long-Fox
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"ProjectChrono" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/projectchrono/4afa92c3-7052-4f8e-bd01-716470e0cadan%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to