Thank you for your reply,
I was already aware of the possibility offered by Chrono, but I necessarily 
have to continue using DEM, since my entire master’s thesis was developed 
on it. By customizing the CUDA kernels, I was able to implement a thermal 
model and modify the electrostatic one. The goal was to build a 
comprehensive regolith model, not just a mechanical one, and moving to 
Chrono would mean losing this work. For my PhD, I will also need to extend 
what I have done so far to include interactions with plasma, which makes it 
essential to keep the electrostatic model. Thank you again for your 
response and for the suggestion regarding DEM-LBM. I now look forward to 
any comments from Ruochun as well. 

Best regards, 
Sabrina  

Il giorno giovedì 21 agosto 2025 alle 18:46:13 UTC+2 Dan Negrut ha scritto:

> Sabrina,
>
> In theory, you can do this in the SPH solver in Chrono, hopefully my 
> colleague Radu will comment on this. It’d require very large sim times 
> because the number of SPH particles would be really large, which is needed 
> to capture the dynamics of the grains.
>
> Another way to do it is DEM-LBM. Chrono has no support for this, and no 
> plan to implement in the immediate future. The sim times would probably be 
> very long, but it’d be a nice approach. If Ruochun sees this, he might 
> comment on this idea.
>
> Lastly, you can homogenize this and represent the regolith–fluid 
> interactions through a continuum and then use the CRM solver in Chrono. 
> You’d need to have the right material model, which means that you’ll have 
> to go beyond the hypo-elastoplastic material model that we have there right 
> now (Drucker-Prager plasticity, with no cap).
>
> Dan
>
> ---------------------------------------------
>
> Bernard A. and Frances M. Weideman Professor
>
> NVIDIA CUDA Fellow
>
> Department of Mechanical Engineering
>
> Department of Computer Science
>
> University of Wisconsin - Madison
>
> 4150ME, 1513 University Avenue
>
> Madison, WI 53706-1572
>
> 608 772 0914 <(608)%20772-0914>
>
> http://sbel.wisc.edu/
>
> http://projectchrono.org/ 
>
> ---------------------------------------------
>
>  
>
> *From:* projec...@googlegroups.com <projec...@googlegroups.com> *On 
> Behalf Of *Sabrina Lanfranco
> *Sent:* Thursday, August 21, 2025 11:36 AM
> *To:* ProjectChrono <projec...@googlegroups.com>
> *Subject:* [chrono] DEM-Engine SPH model integration
>
>  
>
> Hello everyone,
> I am currently using DEM-Engine to model planetary regolith in scenarios 
> involving interactions with space exploration objects. I would now like to 
> extend this modeling to include the study of regolith–fluid interactions.
>
> In your opinion, what would be the most convenient approach: integrating 
> DEM with a solver such as DualSPHysics, or directly implementing a fluid 
> model within DEM itself? In both cases, this would require modifications to 
> the DEM codebase. That is why I am writing here, hoping to get some 
> feedback from the developers: perhaps there is already something 
> undocumented, or maybe you have already considered an approach in this 
> direction.
>
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "ProjectChrono" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to projectchron...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/projectchrono/fa00b521-e8a1-4dd6-be54-7e37358cd230n%40googlegroups.com
>  
> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/groups.google.com/d/msgid/projectchrono/fa00b521-e8a1-4dd6-be54-7e37358cd230n*40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer__;JQ!!Mak6IKo!NWYNqoiUNqQ1gbNA5zSq-hOk7tPnfhQg71_vbAlrHiTOtSqPfwXJytliXNnuGCi9xLpRYSrf2glwAO78v2X2$>
> .
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"ProjectChrono" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to projectchrono+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/projectchrono/3c1d945b-ebc7-45c4-aced-cdfe5bc1e9bdn%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to