Lawmakers push Bush for Iraq exit strategy  
      By Sheryl Gay Stolberg The New York Times

      FRIDAY, JUNE 17, 2005
     


     
      WASHINGTON A resolution calling on President George W. Bush to announce 
an exit strategy from Iraq was introduced Thursday in the House of 
Representatives by a bipartisan group of lawmakers. 

      Two Republicans and two Democrats held a news conference in which they 
prodded Bush to announce a withdrawal timetable by the end of the year. Their 
resolution calls on him to start bringing American troops home by Oct. 1, 2006. 

      "Our troops have done everything we've asked of them," said one sponsor, 
Representative Neil Abercrombie, Democrat of Hawaii. "It's time to get serious 
about an exit strategy." 

      Representative Walter Jones, a North Carolina Republican, who not many 
months ago was so incensed by French opposition to the American-led military 
campaign in Iraq that he wanted the House cafeterias to change the name "French 
fries" to "freedom fries, " agreed. 

      "After 1,700 deaths, over 12,000 wounded and $200 billion spent, we 
believe it is time to have this debate and discussion," he said. The other 
sponsors are Representatives Ron Paul, Republican of Texas, and Dennis 
Kucinich, Democrat of Ohio. 

      With U.S. opinion polls showing a drop in support for the war, and a 
British memo asserting that the Bush administration had intended to go to war 
as early as the summer of 2002, the words "exit strategy" are being uttered by 
Democrats and Republicans on Capitol Hill. 

      The flurry began over the weekend, when Jones called for the Bush 
administration to set specific goals for leaving Iraq. Senator Russell 
Feingold, Democrat of Wisconsin, has introduced in the Senate a measure similar 
to the nonbinding resolution that Jones and his House colleagues are offering. 
In the House, the International Relations Committee last week voted, 32 to 9, 
to call on the White House to develop and submit a plan to Congress for 
establishing a stable government and military in Iraq that would "permit a 
decreased U.S. presence" there. 

      Representative John Conyers Jr., a Michigan Democrat, was convening a 
forum Thursday on the so-called Downing Street Memo, a leaked document that 
appeared to suggest that the White House had made a decision to go to war in 
the summer of 2002. Next week, Representative Rahm Emanuel, an Illinois 
Democrat, is planning to read on the House floor the names of the approximately 
1,700 Americans who have died in the war. 

      Though most Republicans are steering clear of the exit strategy 
discussion, a handful are joining in. Representative Howard Coble of North 
Carolina, for instance, said Wednesday that he was considering it. 

      "I'm not suggesting pulling out tomorrow or next month," said Coble, who 
favored going to war, "but I want that to be an option. I don't want us to 
spend an eternity in Iraq. So conceptually, I'm inclined to embrace Walter 
Jones's proposal." 

      Such comments by Republicans would have been heresy before last the 
election in November, because no one in the party wanted to weaken Bush. But 
now, with 2006 midterm elections approaching, members of Congress are hearing 
from constituents who are growing uneasy about the war. So a nascent discussion 
is emerging in Congress about America's involvement in Iraq and whether it is 
time for re-evaluation. 

      "Certainly, people are breaking ranks, and saying, 'You know what, things 
are not hunky-dory,"' said Representative Joseph Crowley, Democrat of New York, 
who sponsored the measure that passed the International Relations Committee 
last week. Much to Crowley's surprise, it drew support from the panel's 
chairman, Representative Henry Hyde, Republican of Illinois, and 12 other 
Republicans. 

      Many Republicans - and a number of Democrats, including Senator Harry 
Reid of Nevada, the Senate Democratic leader - oppose setting a specific 
timetable for troop withdrawal, saying that to do so would only embolden 
insurgents. 

      The Pentagon reiterated that position Thursday. Lawrence DiRita, a 
Defense Department spokesman, said that to set an "artificial deadline" in 
Washington would be unwise, since "the situation in Iraq is developing along 
based on events in Iraq." 

      But lawmakers are keeping an eye on the polls, which reflect growing 
discontent with the war. A New York Times poll indicates that 37 percent of all 
Americans approve of how Bush is dealing with Iraq, down from 45 percent in 
February. In a recent Gallup poll, 6 in 10 Americans who responded said the 
United States should withdraw all or some of its troops from Iraq. In another 
poll, by ABC News and The Washington Post, two-thirds of those questioned said 
the American military had gotten bogged down in Iraq.  


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



Post message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe   :  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe :  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
List owner  :  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Homepage    :  http://proletar.8m.com/ 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/proletar/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Kirim email ke