Kalo masih belum ngeuh dengan soal Islam yg lagi bergulir
sekarang, ada baeknya baca dibawah:

____
Shia, Sunni to battle for regional supremacy in 2012
By BARRY RUBIN 
01/01/2012 22:13 

The Region: No one should misunderstand the situation. This is fundamentally a 
struggle for political power and wealth.
Of course, there is nothing new about the conflict between Sunni and Shia 
Muslims, but it is indeed new as a feature on the regional level in modern 
times. After all, as long as there were secular-style regimes preaching an 
all-inclusive Arab nationalist identities, differences between religious 
communities were subordinated. Once there are Islamist regimes, theology 
becomes central again, as it was centuries ago.

However, no one should misunderstand the situation. This is fundamentally a 
struggle for political power and wealth. When Sunni and Shia states or 
movements battle they are acting as political entities with strategies, tactics 
and goals.

The growing power and influence of Iran's Islamist regime posed a tremendous 
problem for Arab Sunni Islamists. They generally did not like Iran because it 
was Persian and Shia, yet it was the only Islamist game in town. Thus, Arab 
Sunni Islamist Hamas became an Iranian client. The Iran-Iraq war reflected 
these antagonisms, as best seen in Iraqi propaganda. Yet Iraq's regime was also 
able to keep the Shia majority there under control.

Saddam Hussein's removal by a US-led international force opened up the question 
of communal relations in Iraq. Iraqi Shias are a three-to-one majority over 
their Sunni neighbors, so they will automatically win any election, especially 
with Iraqi Kurds opting out for what is, de facto if not de jure, their own 
state in the north. Despite the anti-American and al-Qaida elements of the 
Sunni insurgency, it was essentially a last-ditch attempt by the Sunnis to 
reclaim power. It failed and while violence continues, now the main Sunni 
emphasis will be on negotiating the best possible division of power.

In Lebanon, too, the Shia triumphed, led by Hezbollah and aided by Syria and 
Iran. But all of this was prelude to the year 2011. The "Arab Spring" was an 
overwhelmingly Sunni affair, their own equivalent in some ways of Iran's 1979 
revolution. Only in Bahrain, where they were repressed, did the Shia take the 
offensive.

Egypt, Tunisia and Libya all had Sunni insurgencies against Sunni Arab 
governments. The situation in Syria is far more complex with an Alawite 
non-Muslim regime that pretends to be Shia Muslim and is allied with Iran, 
opposed by a variety of groups. Nevertheless, in this context, the upheaval is 
a Sunni-led (though far from just Islamist) revolt against a "Shia" regime.

HERE'S THE bottom line: Sunni Arab Islamists no longer need Iran or even Turkey 
because they now have their own power. What is likely to emerge is at least a 
loose Sunni Arab and largely Islamist-flavored bloc consisting of Egypt, the 
Gaza Strip, Libya and Tunisia along with the Muslim Brotherhood elements in 
Jordan and Syria.

The key element here is the Muslim Brotherhood, an organization that doesn't 
like Shia Muslims in general and Iran in particular. Little events, like 
Brotherhood guru Yusuf al-Qaradawi's support for the Sunni regime in Bahrain 
against the Shia opposition, show the direction of their thinking.

The even more radical Salafists – a term now used for the small revolutionary 
Islamist groups, are even more anti-Shia. One factor here is the continued 
unwillingness of the majority of Arab states to welcome Shia-ruled Iraq into 
their ranks. Iraq is not going to become a satellite of Iran. It certainly 
feels more comfortable in a Shia bloc but will probably continue to be 
relatively uninvolved in regional affairs.

Note, too, that to a large extent this situation leaves the Palestinian 
Authority an orphan. While the PA can depend on general Arab, Iranian and 
Turkish support, it has no regional patron, and Hamas is currently the group 
enjoying the Sunni Islamists' warm support. This, of course, encourages the 
Palestinian Authority's (Fatah's) alliance with Hamas while also weakening its 
leverage toward that Islamist partner. (And that means a continued disinterest 
in negotiating with Israel, much less reaching a negotiated solution with it.) 

Thus, despite appearances, 2011 was a defeat for Iran and Turkey because Sunni 
Arab Islamists are far less receptive to Tehran's influence and view it as a 
rival, while Arab Islamists don't want leadership from Turks either.

Can these blocs unite effectively against the United States, the West or 
Israel? In a word: No.

Their struggles for regional power and for control of individual states 
(Bahrain, Lebanon, Syria, and to a far lesser extent Iraq) will keep them in 
conflict. Even on the anti-Israel consensus they will each seek to exploit it 
for their own interests.

By the same token, however, the hope for moderation is minimal. In a region 
where regimes and movements are competing to prove their militancy and loyalty 
to a radical interpretation of Islam, nobody is going to want to make peace 
with Israel. And regimes will only work with the United States if they feel 
believe America can and will protect them, a rather forlorn hope with an Obama 
administration eager to make friends with Islamists.

There is also another aspect to this Sunni-Shia rivalry, the formation of 
blocs, the competition in militancy and the battle for control of individual 
states. The region will continue to waste lives, time and resources in 
political strife as the lure of ideology and power rather than pragmatism and 
economic productivity still rule even if the old regimes have fallen.

The writer is director of the Global Research in International Affairs (GLORIA) 
Center and a featured columnist at Pajamas Media. His new book, Israel: An 
Introduction, will be published by Yale University Press in January.



------------------------------------

Post message: [email protected]
Subscribe   :  [email protected]
Unsubscribe :  [email protected]
List owner  :  [email protected]
Homepage    :  http://proletar.8m.com/Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/proletar/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/proletar/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [email protected] 
    [email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Kirim email ke