Faktanya tetap ada cewek yg nganjurin unt ngelegalkan dagang dan ngembat budak, 
ga ada urusan dgn website Faithfreedom.


Di milis ini jg ada cewek dungu yg ga merasa direndahkan oleh Islam yg bilang 
cewek bisa dipoligami, dicerai dgn 3 kata doang, digebukin kalo dianggap ga 
setia, dianggap idiot dll. Ini fakta, ga ada urusan dgn gua yg ngomong apa 
bukan.





>________________________________
> From: Musik hari Ini <[email protected]>
>To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> 
>Sent: Sunday, June 24, 2012 5:37 PM
>Subject: Re: [proletar] Men should be allowed sex slaves and female prisoners 
>could do the job – and all this from a WOMAN politician from Kuwait
> 
>
>  
>Bleki bacaan elu kagak bermutu
>kayak faithfreedom.org kagak ada mutu nya
>
>kata Johnny indo  tunjukkanlah bahwa umat kresten protestan itu 
>
>cerdas dan santun bermoral beretika & Berbudi luhur
>terus2an nyerang islam, atau bilang katolik itu brengsek,
>ngga bakalan bikin orang simpati sama agama yg lagi elu jual
>
>________________________________
>From: item abu <[email protected]>
>To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> 
>Sent: Sunday, June 24, 2012 2:35 AM
>Subject: [proletar] Men should be allowed sex slaves and female prisoners 
>could do the job – and all this from a WOMAN politician from Kuwait
>
>
>  
>Dungu mana antara si cewek Kuwait di bawah ini dgn si arra_s? Yg jelas sih 
>dua2nya dungu.
> 
>http://www.faithfreedom.org/features/news/men-should-be-allowed-sex-slaves-and-female-prisoners-could-do-the-job-and-all-this-from-a-woman-politician-from-kuwait/
> 
>8:38 pm | Posted by FFI Editor 
>Men should be allowed sex slaves and female  prisoners could do the job – and 
>all this from a WOMAN politician from  Kuwait
>By Daily Mail Reporter
> 
>A Kuwaiti woman who once ran for parliament has called for sex  slavery to be 
>legalised – and suggested that non-Muslim prisoners from  war-torn countries 
>would make suitable concubines.
> 
>Salwa al Mutairi argued buying a sex-slave would protect decent,  devout and 
>‘virile’ Kuwaiti men from adultery because buying an imported  sex partner 
>would be tantamount to marriage.
> 
>And she even had an idea of where to ‘purchase’ these sex-salves –  browsing 
>through female prisoners of war in other countries.
> 
>The political activist and TV host even suggested that it would be a better 
>life for women in warring countries as the might die of starvation.
> 
>Mutairi claimed: ‘There was no shame in it and it is not haram’ (forbidden) 
>under Islamic Sharia law.’
> 
>She gave the example of Haroun al-Rashid, an 8th century Muslim leader who 
>ruled over an area covered by modern-day Iran, Iraq and Syria and was rumoured 
>to have 2,000 concubines.
> 
>Mutairi recommended that offices could be opened to run the sex trade in the 
>same way that recruitment agencies provide housemaids.
> 
>She suggested shopping for prisoners of war so as to protect Kuwaiti men from 
>being tempted to commit adultery or being seduced by other women’s beauty.
> 
>‘For example, in the Chechnyan war, surely there are female Russian 
>captives,’ she said.
> 
>‘So go and buy those and sell them here in Kuwait. Better than to have our 
>men engage in forbidden sexual relations.’ 
> 
>Her unbelievable argument for her plan was that ‘captives’ might ‘just die of 
>hunger over there’.
> 
>She insisted, ‘I don’t see any problem in this, no problem at all’.
> 
>In an attempt to consider the woman’s feelings in the arrangement, Mutari 
>conceded that the enslaved women, however, should be at least 15.
> 
>Mutairi said free women must be married with a contract but with concubines 
>‘the man just buys her and that’s it. That’s enough to serve as marriage.’ 
> 
>Her remarks, made in a video posted on YouTube last month and carried by 
>newspapers in the Gulf 
>states in recent days, have sparked outrage in cyber-space from fellow 
>Kuwaitis 
>and others in the wider region.
> 
>‘Wonder how Salwa al Mutairi would’ve felt if during the occupation (of 
>Kuwait) by Iraqi forces, she was sold as ‘war booty’ as she advocates for 
>Chechen women,’ tweeted Mona Eltahawy.
> 
>Another tweeter, Shireen Qudosi, told Mutairi ‘you’re a disgrace to women 
>everywhere’.
> 
>For Muna Khan, an editor at the Saudi-owned Al Arabiya television station, 
>the ‘icing on the cake’ of Mutairi’s ‘preposterous views’ was her assertion 
>that 
>her suggestions do not conflict with the tenets of Islam.
> 
>Mutairi said that during a recent visit to Mecca, she asked Saudi muftis – 
>Muslim religious scholars – what the Islamic ruling was on owning sex slaves. 
>They are said to have told her that it is not haram.
> 
>The ruling was confirmed by ‘specialized people of the faith’ in Kuwait, she 
>claimed.
> 
>‘They said, that’s right, the only solution for a decent man who has the 
>means, who is overpowered by desire and who does not want to commit 
>fornication, 
>is to acquire jawari.’ Jawari is the plural of the Arabic term jariya, meaning 
>‘concubine’ or ‘sex slave’.
> 
>One Saudi mufti supposedly told Mutairi: ‘The context must be that of a 
>Muslim nation conquering a non-Muslim nation, so these jawari have to be 
>prisoners of war from non-Muslim countries.’ 
> 
>Concubines, she argued, would suit Muslim men who fear being ‘seduced or 
>tempted into immoral behaviour by the beauty of their female servants’.
> 
>Read more: 
>http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2000292/Men-allowed-sex-slaves-female-prisoners-job–WOMAN-politician-Kuwait.html#ixzz1xQOrPQjt
> 
>Although Mutairi’s comment may sound outrageous to many Muslim women, she is 
>actually stating what Muhammad practiced and preached. When she says it is not 
>forbidden she has several verses of the Quran to bring as evidence. Muhammad 
>had 
>many sex slaves and allowed his men to have sex with captive women even when 
>these women were already married. Since the teachings of the Quran are deemed 
>to 
>be valid until the end of the world, slavery and sex slavery will be practiced 
>again should Islam become the dominant religion.  The only reason slavery is 
>not 
>widely practiced today in Islamic countries is because it won’t be tolerated 
>by 
>the non-Muslim world. Once this world is conquered slavery will be back and 
>humanity will revert to savagery.
>
>[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
> 
>
>

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

Post message: [email protected]
Subscribe   :  [email protected]
Unsubscribe :  [email protected]
List owner  :  [email protected]
Homepage    :  http://proletar.8m.com/Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/proletar/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/proletar/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [email protected] 
    [email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Kirim email ke