.. .. tulisan yg bagus .. tx .. .. On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 4:57 AM, Sunny <[email protected]> wrote:
> ** > > > > http://english.pravda.ru/opinion/columnists/24-06-2012/121466-turkish_violation-0/ > Turkish Fighter Aircraft: Making some sense > 24.06.2012 Predictably, Turkey has reacted to the destruction of one of > its aircraft with stupidity and cowardice and predictably, the western > leaders have jumped at the chance to up the stakes in an internal conflict > in Syria which they are aiding and abetting by providing terrorists with > weaponry. Through Turkey. > > If anyone has acted responsibly since the start of this conflict, it is > the Syrian authorities and conversely, if anyone has acted irresponsibly > since the beginning, it is those who are openly Syria's enemies, namely > NATO in general, which includes Turkey and as usual in particular, the > FUKUS-Axis (France, UK and US). > > How the Syrian Government has behaved > > The Syrian opposition to the Government exists. It represents around 30 to > at most 35% of the population, and is split into around 30 groups. Some of > these groups are armed, carrying out terrorist insurrection attacks against > the police and army that try to defend the population against this scourge, > which perpetrates the same sort of outrages against human rights as we saw > in NATO's terrorists in Libya (rape, sodomy, arson, murder, torture, > looting). > > The Syrian authorities have lost thousands of police and armed forces > personnel in these terrorist attacks against a population which is 65 to > 70% behind its President. When a Government is attacked by thousands of > armed terrorists committing atrocities, it does not stand by with its arms > folded. It acts. And this is what the Syrian Government has been doing. > > a.. Print version > b.. Font Size > c.. Send to friend > Not only have the Syrian armed forces been sterilising infested areas of > these elements, liquidating this terrorist scourge and protecting the > citizens but also, it has launched a national reconciliation and > forgiveness process in Tartous. This, despite continued attacks by the > terrorist gangs funded and armed by the west, through Turkey allegedly by > courtesy of the CIA, among others. > > Just yesterday the authorities exterminated a number of this terrorist > filth in Deir Ezzor and Homs, while in Hama a terrorist explosives factory > was seized. Yesterday was also the scene of the funerals of sixty-eight > police, army personnel and innocent civilians massacred by NATO's > terrorists. Are we going to hear about this in western media? Of course > not. So we see how credible their reporting is. > > How the west has behaved > > From the very beginning, the west has sought to destabilise Syria as a > first step towards denying Russia its last Mediterranean base in the run-up > to a full-scale war against Iran, and thereafter incursion into the Central > Asian energy fields. Afghanistan was one part of the puzzle, Libya was > strategically the easiest piece to place while at the same time any > aspirations Africa had to controlling its resources were removed with > Colonel Gaddafi. > > Turkey has been aiding the terrorists, providing safe haven for what it > calls Suriye Ulusal Geçiş Konseyi, or in English, the Syrian National > Council, a motley collection of individuals from the fringes of Syrian > society who once placed in Government, will ask How High? when told to > jump. There are also widespread reports of Turkish incursions into Syrian > territory and Turkey acting as a staging post for arming these groups of > terrorists. > > As usual, and as we saw in Libya, the west has been lying from the outset, > ordering massacres from its terrorist friends in puerile attempts to > discredit the Syrian Government. Does anyone remember the supposed massacre > by shelling when all the victims were pro-Government Allouites with their > hands tied behind their backs? No? Links (1) > > What does Turkey expect? > > So given this background, what does Turkey expect? After denying the > aircraft was in Syrian airspace we have had, as usual from NATO, all kinds > of conflicting stories (why are they such ineffective liars?) First Turkish > Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoglu states that the rescue operation was being > conducted with Syria because the aircraft was in Syrian territorial waters, > as the Syrians have claimed all along, now the Turkish side states the > aircraft was in international waters. The Turkish president, Abdullah Gul, > has stated that the aircraft may have strayed into Syrian territory > unintentionally due to the high speeds these aircraft reach. > > Now they claim the aircraft was unarmed and was merely on a training > mission to test the Turkish radar systems. > > Are the Turkish President and Foreign Minister stupid, or what? What do > they expect? You allow your territory to be used to arm terrorists to > destabilise a sovereign nation, send a Phantom F-4 military assault > aircraft flying fast and low into that country's territorial waters (not to > test Turkish radar but yes, to test the Syrian anti-aircraft system) and > then when it is shot down, run crying to NATO because you got your nose > smacked in? > > Under international law, a country has the right to defend itself against > aerial targets which violate its airspace. Period. The target was engaged > 0.5 nautical miles from Syria's coast and was destroyed, crashing 5 > nautical miles to sea. That is still seven nautical miles within Syrian > territory. > > It is to be hoped that any military adventures by Ankara will be met with > the proper response from the Syrian side but then again, as we saw with the > Turkish boats in the Gaza siege... a coward is a coward. Turkey started it, > Syria responded and now Turkey goes running to NATO. > > What was that Israel says when it slaughters civilians? Ah yes, I > remember: They shouldn't have been there, should they? The question Turkey > should be putting to NATO on Tuesday is, Should we be arming terrorists? > Should we be using Turkish territory to send weapons to terrorists to > slaughter civilians and should Turkish military aircraft be violating > Syrian airspace even if, as the Turkish President said, they fly so fast. > Rolleyes... > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] ------------------------------------ Post message: [email protected] Subscribe : [email protected] Unsubscribe : [email protected] List owner : [email protected] Homepage : http://proletar.8m.com/Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/proletar/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/proletar/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: [email protected] [email protected] <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [email protected] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
