Bush's choice: America or the empire
By RAMZY BAROUD
Special to The Japan Times
KUALA LUMPUR -- Deep down, U.S. President George W. Bush should grasp the
seriousness of his debacle. If true, then he must also appreciate the time
element in averting the worse-case scenario, which he, along with an
increasingly alienated number of ideologues are imposing on their country.
Iraq is a multifaceted disaster, and its calamitous effects are hurting America
on many levels. The number of U.S. soldiers killed in Iraq is creeping up to
the 2,000 mark. The figure of those wounded and maimed -- some permanently
disabled -- is several folds higher.
This war is too costly. Hundreds of millions of dollars are diverted from the
U.S. budget everyday to feed the war machine; good news for the Pentagon and
the military establishment maybe, but not so good for the majority of
Americans, especially the poorest among them.
The U.S. Army is stretched too thin, bogged down in a war gone awry. Many
National Guard units, whose sole mission is to tend to the nation's needs in
times of crisis, were deployed to Iraq. The consequences of such indiscretions
were exhibited in the Katrina disaster to a humiliating degree.
Public opinion has been illustrative of Bush's heedless foreign-policy conduct.
A recent CNN/Gallup/USA Today poll found that 67 percent of Americans
disapprove of the way Bush is handling the situation in Iraq. The majority of
Americans, according to the poll, want to see serious cuts in military spending
and a diversion of resources to help in the post-Katrina rebuilding efforts.
But that is simply not feasible. The security in Iraq is deteriorating, and the
insurgency is gaining momentum. All attempts to diminish the authenticity or
magnitude of the resistance have failed. What's going on in Iraq is not the
work of a few infiltrators, nor can it be narrowly defined according to ethnic
classification or the character of one or a cluster of individuals.
If the war was a faltering empire's attempt to thrust itself in a highly
strategic geopolitical location and thus gain control over precious energy
sources, then it was a strategic blunder. It is threatening the stability of an
entire region and also exposing the inadequacies of U.S. military capabilities.
If U.S. military strategists -- especially those close to the president --
possess the courage to extract lessons from history and recognize the
complexity of the political reality in Iraq, they would undoubtedly conclude
that the war in Iraq is simply unwinnable.
Knowing that the U.S. cannot prevail in the war, the Bush administration is
focusing on winning time by diverting attention from Iraq with smoke screens.
There was the "bringing democracy" to the Arab world charade, with its last
episode being the elections mockery in Egypt. And before that was the frenzy
over the Islamic madrassas and how they gives birth to "little terrorists" --
to use the outlandish term of one CNN journalist, and so forth.
But every smoke screen has eventually dispersed to reveal the same tragic
reality that the White House is laboriously trying to conceal: Bush's war has
no future strategy and no quantifiable objective. Once these two elements are
removed, all that is left behind is war for the sake of war, a perpetual,
endless military strife devoid of meaning except that cruelly inferred by an
extremist zealot or a conceited ideologue. Evidently, the Bush constituency
thrives on both.
Even a pompous president with a divine mission must recognize a disaster when
he sees one. It is improbable that Bush actually believes his own rhetoric of a
world full of promise, which he supposedly molded, whether in Iraq,
Afghanistan, Egypt, Lebanon or Gaza.
Americans are distancing themselves from the conflict and the administration's
inflated projections. Despite the duplicity and outright ignorance of the
media, an estimated 300,000 antiwar protesters descended on Washington D.C. on
Sept. 24, demanding an immediate end to the war in Iraq. They included
representatives of 250 American families who lost loved ones in Iraq. Also
coming in droves were hundreds of war veterans, many of whom became disabled in
Iraq. They all came seeking answers, disclosure and an end to the incessant war
madness that has engulfed their nation.
But Bush is unlikely to yield. He too has a crowd for which he cares deeply,
convoluted interest groups that are a bizarre mix of business elites and
corporate contractors, religious fanatics and top military brass.
Bush's immediate constituency is unified in its war agenda, each group for its
own reasons. An immediate withdrawal from Iraq is an ideological defeat; an
irreplaceable financial loss for some; an end, if temporarily, to unwarranted
military interventionism and the injurious diminishment to America's political
hegemony. Considering that occupying and controlling Iraq was the pinnacle of
the Bush war advocates' infamous manifesto on how to "secure the realms" of an
increasingly challenged empire, a withdrawal from Iraq would certainly be the
end of that dream.
Yet staying in Iraq in a futile "hunt" for "terrorists" with an augmenting
insurgency that is steadily engulfing the whole country is nothing like the
envisaged "cakewalk" fantasy that also foresaw Iraqis showering the liberators
with flowers and candy. Iraq has grown to become the empire's most dreadful
nightmare.
This self-inflicted predicament presents Bush and his administration with two
arduous options: to disown their commitment to the empire and to exit Iraq
immediately, saving some face and an opportunity -- if only a meager one -- to
manage the crisis they've helped create with the hope of reconciling with the
majority of the American people, or to weather the Iraqi storm, hoping for a
miracle before their ship is completely sunk.
The hundreds of thousands of Americans who marched on Washington in protest of
Bush and his costly wars -- in fact the majority of the American people -- have
made their voices loud and clear. Will Bush and his self-righteous ideologues
listen, just for once?
Ramzy Baroud, a veteran Arab American journalist, teaches mass communication at
Australia's Curtin University of Technology, Malaysia Campus. His forthcoming
book, "Writings on the Second Palestinian Uprising," is being published by
Pluto Press, London
The Japan Times: Oct. 3, 2005
(C) All rights reserved
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~-->
Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page
http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/uTGrlB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~->
Post message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
List owner : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Homepage : http://proletar.8m.com/
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/proletar/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
