http://www.greenleft.org.au/back/2005/645/645p24.htm

INDONESIA: How the West backed the massacre of a million people

Clinton Fernandes 

The destruction of the Indonesian Communist Party (PKI), 40 years ago following 
the seizure of power by pro-US military officers headed by General Suharto was 
a decisive event in the history of South-East Asia in the second half of the 
20th century. 

By 1965, the PKI had three million members and was said to be the largest 
Communist party in the world outside of the Soviet Union and China. In addition 
to its large membership, about 15 million people had indirect connections to 
the party through their membership of peasant associations, labour unions and 
other social movement organisations led by PKI members. It was, according to a 
September 1, 1965, US National Intelligence Estimate, "by far the best 
organized and most dynamic entity in Indonesia". 

Within a few months of the October 1, 1965, Suharto-organised military coup, 
however, the PKI would be destroyed in a cataclysmic campaign of political 
terror and mass murder carried out by the Indonesian armed forces (ABRI) and 
right-wing Islamic organisations. 

According to a 1968 study by the CIA, "in terms of the numbers killed the 
anti-PKI massacres in Indonesia rank as one of the worst mass murders of the 
20th century, along with the Soviet purges of the 1930s, the Nazi mass murders 
during the Second World War, and the Maoist bloodbath of the early 1950s". At 
least one million Indonesians were slaughtered in the anti-PKI massacres. 

Nowadays, of course, Western policy-makers are trying to rehabilitate the 
Indonesian military's reputation in order to fight Jemaah Islamiyah. This 
article, therefore, examines Western support for this anti-PKI terror campaign, 
which seriously weakened Indonesian political life and set the scene for the 
emergence of Islamic terrorism in the region. For reasons of space, it takes up 
the story after the massacres had commenced. 

Once the killings were underway, Western policy-makers and diplomats were keen 
to support the ABRI. The problem they faced was that President Sukarno's 
previous anti-imperialist rhetoric had resonated strongly with the Indonesian 
public. Any overt support would therefore serve only to expose the Indonesian 
army as a tool of the West. 

Sukarno's towering reputation presented a significant obstacle. A deft touch 
was required. US ambassador Marshall Green understood that economic aid should 
not be offered because economic difficulties hurt the reputation of the 
civilian administration, not the army. His military contacts told him that 
there was an urgent need for food and clothing in Indonesia but it was more 
important to let Sukarno and his foreign minister, Subandrio, "stew in their 
own juice". 

Western media coverage
The information campaign in support of the killings was created along similar 
principles. The ABRI secretly urged that foreign news broadcasters not give the 
army "too much credit" or criticise Sukarno. Instead, they should emphasise PKI 
"atrocities" and the party's role in the mutiny by left-wing ABRI officers that 
preceded the Suharto-led coup. 

While Sukarno could not be directly attacked, an Indonesian general offered to 
provide Western agencies background information on foreign minister Subandrio, 
who was regarded as more vulnerable. 

Australian ambassador Keith Shann was told by his superiors that Radio 
Australia should never suggest that the ABRI was pro-Western or right-wing. 
Instead, credit for the anti-PKI campaign should be given to other 
organisations, such as Muslim and nationalist youth groups. 

Radio Australia had an important role to play because of its high signal 
strength and huge audience in Indonesia. Its listeners included the elite as 
well as students, who liked it because it played rock music, which had been 
officially banned. It was therefore told to "be on guard against giving 
information to the Indonesian people that would be withheld by the 
Army-controlled internal media". 

The Australian ambassador worked to ensure that it gave "prominent coverage" to 
"reports of PKI involvement and Communist Chinese complicity" while playing 
down or not broadcasting "reports of divisions within the army specifically and 
armed services more generally". 

Another senior official recommended that Radio Australia "not do anything which 
would be helpful to the PKI". Instead, it "should highlight reports tending to 
discredit the PKI and show its involvement in the losing cause". 

The US, Britain and Australia co-operated closely in the propaganda effort. 
Marshall Green urged Washington to "spread the story of PKI's guilt, treachery 
and brutality", adding that this was "perhaps the most needed immediate 
assistance we can give army if we can find [a] way to do it without identifying 
it as [a] sole or largely US effort". 

The British Foreign Office hoped to "encourage anti-Communist Indonesians to 
more vigorous action in the hope of crushing Communism in Indonesia 
altogether". Britain would emphasise "PKI brutality in murdering Generals and 
families, Chinese interference, particularly arms shipments, PKI subverting 
Indonesia as the agents of foreign Communists". 

British ambassador Sir Andrew Gilchrist wrote: "I have never concealed my 
belief that a little shooting in Indonesia would be an essential preliminary to 
effective change". 

Throughout this period, Western radio stations continued to recycle stories 
from Radio Jakarta or the army newspapers and broadcast them back to Indonesia. 
US embassy officials established a back-channel link through the US army 
attache in Jakarta, who regularly met with an aide to Suharto ally General 
Haris Nasution. 

The US embassy also compiled lists of PKI leaders and thousands of senior 
members and handed them over to the Indonesian military. While these kinds of 
lists were based entirely on previous reporting by the PKI's press, they proved 
invaluable to the military which seemed "to lack even the simplest overt 
information on PKI leadership at the time", according to a report Green sent to 
Washington in August 1966. 

General Sukendro, a senior army intelligence officer, secretly approached the 
US embassy in early October 1965, asking for assistance in the army's 
operations against the PKI. This included supplying "small arms to arm Muslim 
and nationalist youths in Central Java for use against the PKI". 

Green authorised the provision of 50 million rupiahs to the Kap-Gestapu 
movement, which was leading the anti-PKI terror campaign. He advised the State 
Department that there was "no doubt whatsoever that Kap-Gestapu's activity is 
fully consonant with and coordinated by the army. We have had substantial 
intelligence reporting to support this." 

Overall, the US provided the ABRI with money, medicines, communications 
equipment, weapons and intelligence. It was satisfied with the return it 
received on this investment. 

On February 21, 1966, Sukarno tried to reshuffle his cabinet and sack General 
Nasution as defence minister. But with the public cowed in fear of the 
killings, Sukarno's attempt to assert his authority failed. There were large 
demonstrations backed by the army, and on March 11 soldiers mounted a show of 
force outside the presidential palace. 

Sukarno signed a letter of authority handing over executive power to General 
Suharto. He remained president until 1967, continuing to defend the PKI and to 
speak out against the massacres and anti-Chinese racism that accompanied them. 
Without access to the media, however, his speeches failed to achieve political 
traction. 

In the wake of the massacres, Indonesia's pre-eminent cultural and intellectual 
organisations - the Peoples' Cultural Institute, the National Cultural 
Institute, and the Indonesian Scholars' Association - were shut down, and many 
of their members were arrested or imprisoned. 

More than one and a half million Indonesians passed through a system of prisons 
and prison camps. The PKI was physically annihilated, and popular organisations 
associated with it were suppressed. The whole of Indonesian society was 
forcibly depoliticised. In village after village, local bureaucrats backed by 
the army imposed a control matrix of permits, rules and regulations. Citizens 
were required to obtain a "letter of clean circumstances" certifying that they 
and their extended families had not been associated with the left before 1965. 
Indonesian society became devoted to the prevention of any challenge to elite 
interests. 

Control of the universities, newspapers and cultural institutions was handed to 
conservative writers and intellectuals, who collaborated with Suharto's New 
Order regime and did not oppose the jailing of their left-wing cultural rivals. 
Along with the violence, certain cultural values were strongly promoted. 
Discussion of personal, religious and consumerist issues was encouraged, while 
discussion of politics was considered to be in bad taste. The conservative 
establishment also monopolised Indonesia's external cultural relations. 

Suharto would rule for more than 30 years until a popular uprising and a 
crisis-ridden economy forced his resignation on May 21, 1998. 

[Dr Clinton Fernandes is a historian and author of Reluctant Saviour: 
Australia, Indonesia and the independence of East Timor (Scribe, 2004). He is 
currently a visiting fellow at the Australian National University.] 


>From Green Left Weekly, October 12, 2005. 
Visit the Green Left Weekly home page. 

Send a letter to the editor Join the Green Left discussion list 


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
Life without art & music? Keep the arts alive today at Network for Good!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/FXrMlA/dnQLAA/Zx0JAA/uTGrlB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

Post message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe   :  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe :  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
List owner  :  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Homepage    :  http://proletar.8m.com/ 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/proletar/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Kirim email ke