tumben si uplik ngga ngebantah bahayanya alkohol.
pasti posting artikel dari guardian ini abis nenggak alkohol ya?

--- In [email protected], "Bukan Pedanda"  wrote:
>
> 
> Ini berita di Guardian..
> 
> http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2010/nov/01/alcohol-more-harmful-than-heroin-crack
> 
> 
> 
>     News
>     Society
>     Alcohol
> 
> Alcohol 'more harmful than heroin or crack'
> 
> Sacked government drugs adviser David Nutt publishes investigation in Lancet 
> reopening debate on classification
> 
> Alcohol is the most dangerous drug in the UK by a considerable margin, 
> beating heroin and crack cocaine into second and third place, according to an 
> authoritative study published today which will reopen calls for the drugs 
> classification system to be scrapped and a concerted campaign launched 
> against drink.
> 
> Led by the sacked government drugs adviser David Nutt with colleagues from 
> the breakaway Independent Scientific Committee on Drugs, the study says that 
> if drugs were classified on the basis of the harm they do, alcohol would be 
> class A, alongside heroin and crack cocaine.
> 
> Today's paper, published by the respected Lancet medical journal, will be 
> seen as a challenge to the government to take on the fraught issue of the 
> relative harms of legal and illegal drugs, which proved politically damaging 
> to Labour.
> 
> Nutt was sacked last year by the home secretary at the time, Alan Johnson, 
> for challenging ministers' refusal to take the advice of the official 
> Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs, which he chaired. The committee 
> wanted cannabis to remain a class C drug and for ecstasy to be downgraded 
> from class A, arguing that these were less harmful than other drugs. Nutt 
> claimed scientific evidence was overruled for political reasons.
> 
> The new paper updates a study carried out by Nutt and others in 2007, which 
> was also published by the Lancet and triggered debate for suggesting that 
> legally available alcohol and tobacco were more dangerous than cannabis and 
> LSD.
> 
> Alcohol, in that paper, ranked fifth most dangerous overall. The 2007 paper 
> also called for an overhaul of the drug classification system, but critics 
> disputed the criteria used to rank the drugs and the absence of differential 
> weighting.
> 
> Today's study offers a more complex analysis that seeks to address the 2007 
> criticisms. It examines nine categories of harm that drugs can do to the 
> individual "from death to damage to mental functioning and loss of 
> relationships" and seven types of harm to others. The maximum possible harm 
> score was 100 and the minimum zero.
> 
> Overall, alcohol scored 72 – against 55 for heroin and 54 for crack. The most 
> dangerous drugs to their individual users were ranked as heroin, crack and 
> then crystal meth. The most harmful to others were alcohol, heroin and crack 
> in that order.
> 
> Nutt told the Guardian the drug classification system needed radical change. 
> "The Misuse of Drugs Act is past its sell-by date and needs to be redone," he 
> said. "We need to rethink how we deal with drugs in the light of these new 
> findings."
> 
> For overall harm, the other drugs examined ranked as follows: crystal meth 
> (33), cocaine (27), tobacco (26), amphetamine/speed (23), cannabis (20), GHB 
> (18), benzodiazepines (15), ketamine (15), methadone (13), butane (10), qat 
> (9), ecstasy (9), anabolic steroids (9), LSD (7), buprenorphine (6) and magic 
> mushrooms (5).
> 
> The authors write: "Our findings lend support to previous work in the UK and 
> the Netherlands, confirming that the present drug classification systems have 
> little relation to the evidence of harm. They also accord with the 
> conclusions of previous expert reports that aggressively targeting alcohol 
> harm is a valid and necessary public health strategy."
> 
> Nutt told the Lancet a new classification system "would depend on what set of 
> harms 'to self or others' you are trying to reduce". He added: "But if you 
> take overall harm, then alcohol, heroin and crack are clearly more harmful 
> than all others, so perhaps drugs with a score of 40 or more could be class 
> A; 39 to 20 class B; 19-10 class C and 10 or under class D." This would 
> result in tobacco being labelled a class B drug alongside cocaine. Cannabis 
> would also just make class B, rather than class C. Ecstasy and LSD would end 
> up in the lowest drug category, D.
> 
> He was not suggesting classification was unnecessary: "We do need a 
> classification system – we do need to regulate the ones that are very harmful 
> to individuals like heroin and crack cocaine." But he thought the UK could 
> learn from the Portuguese and Dutch: "They have innovative policies which 
> could reduce criminalisation." Representatives of both countries will be at a 
> summit in London today, called drug science and drug policy: building a 
> consensus, where the study will be presented.
> 
> UK reformers will be hoping the coalition government will take a more 
> evidence-based approach to classification and tackling drugs than Labour did. 
> The Liberal Democrats supported Nutt over his sacking, while Conservative 
> leader David Cameron, who got into trouble at Eton, aged 15, for smoking 
> cannabis, acknowledged the Misuse of Drugs Act was not working during his 
> time as an MP on the Home Affairs select committee.
> 
> Nutt called for far more effort to be put into reducing harm caused by 
> alcohol, pointing out that its economic costs, as well as the costs to 
> society of addiction and broken families, are very high. Taxation on alcohol 
> is "completely inappropriate", he said – with strong cider, for instance, 
> taxed at a fifth of the rate of wine – and action should particularly target 
> the low cost and promotion of alcohol such as Bacardi breezers to young 
> people.
> 
> Don Shenker, the chief executive of Alcohol Concern, said : "What this study 
> and new classification shows is that successive governments have mistakenly 
> focused attention on illicit drugs, whereas the pervading harms from alcohol 
> should have given a far higher priority. Drug misusers are still ten times 
> more likely to receive support for their addiction than alcohol misusers, 
> costing the taxpayer billions in repeat hospital admissions and alcohol 
> related crime. Alcohol misuse has been exacerbated in recent years as 
> government failed to accept the link between cheap prices, higher consumption 
> and resultant harms to individuals and society."
> 
> "[The] government should now urgently ensure alcohol is made less affordable 
> and invest in prevention and treatment services to deal with the rise in 
> alcohol dependency that has occurred."
> 
> The Home Office said last night: "We have not read the report. This 
> government has just completed an alcohol consultation and will publish a 
> drugs strategy in the coming months."
> 
> A Department of Health spokesperson said: "In England, most people drink once 
> a week or less. If you're a women and stick to two to three units a day or a 
> man and drink up to three or four units, you are unlikely to damage your 
> health. The government is determined to prevent alcohol abuse without 
> disadvantaging those who drink sensibly."Two experts from the Amsterdam 
> National Institute for Public Health and the Environment and the Amsterdam 
> Institute for Addiction Research point out in a Lancet commentary the study 
> does not look at multiple drug use, which can make some drugs much more 
> dangerous – such as cocaine or cannabis together with alcohol – but they 
> acknowledge the topic was outside its scope.
> 
> They add that because the pattern of recreational drug use changes, the study 
> should be repeated every five or 10 years.
> 
> 
> 
> --- In [email protected], Ballast Yo  wrote:
> >
> > juspig tolol itu selain krn sakit jiwa juga krn pengaruh nenggak alkohol.
> > dia sudah tidak bisa lagi paham hasil penelitian.
> > menyedihkan memang.
> > bisa utk cerita penghibur pemulung bantar gebang bhw ada orang yg lebih 
> > menyedihkan di alam raya ini.
> > 
> > bahkan saking tololnya, juspig mengatakan tanpa argumen bhw
> > gereja yg menolak homoseksual itu berotak babi..!!
> > 
> > kini bersusah payah dlm kekalutannya,
> > dlm ketololannya,
> > dlm kedunguannya yg luarbiasa,
> > utk melimpahkan kesalahan pd orang lain.
> > sungguh binatang paling tolol yg pernah ada di dunia akherat....
> > 
> > bahkan rela menjilat pembunuh yg membantai bangsa indonesia di rawagedhe,
> > 
> > 
> > ==
> > penelitian lama: 
> > 
> > Alcohol More Harmful Than Heroin: Study
> > 
> > Alcohol is a more dangerous and lethal drug than heroin or crack cocaine, a 
> > damning British study has found, urging governments to readjust their 
> > priorities in the fight against narcotics. 
> > 
> > "Overall, alcohol is the most harmful drug because it's so widely used,” 
> > Professor David Nutt, the British government's former chief drug adviser, 
> > told the BBC on Monday, November 1.
> > 
> > Scientists from Britain’s Independent Scientific Committee on Drugs 
> > conducted the study which ranks 20 drugs on 16 measures of harm to users 
> > and to the wider society.
> > 
> > They scored each drug for harms including mental and physical damage, 
> > addiction, crime and costs to the economy and communities.
> > 
> > The findings, published in the prominent medical journal The Lancet, 
> > affirmed that alcohol is even more harmful than other more addictive drugs 
> > like heroin, which ranked second.
> > 
> > Alcohol came on the top of dangerous drugs overall and almost three times 
> > as harmful as cocaine or tobacco when the combined harms to the user and to 
> > others are assessed.
> > 
> > Overall, alcohol scored 72 â€" against 55 for heroin and 54 for crack on 
> > scientists’ scale.
> > 
> > "Because alcohol is so widely used there are hundreds of thousands of 
> > people who crave alcohol every day, and those people will go to 
> > extraordinary lengths to get it," Nutt asserted.
> > 
> > Islam takes an uncompromising stand in prohibiting intoxicants.
> > 
> > The general rule in Islam is that any beverage that get people intoxicated 
> > when taken is unlawful, both in small and large quantities, whether it is 
> > alcohol, drugs, fermented raisin drink or something else.
> > 
> > Target Alcohol 
> > 
> > Scientists affirmed that the findings affirm the necessity of “targeting 
> > alcohol harms”.
> > 
> > "We need to rethink how we deal with drugs in the light of these new 
> > findings," Nutt told The Guardian.
> > 
> > The study urged the governments to address the drug classification systems 
> > and to pay more attention to the plight of alcohol.
> > 
> > ==dipotong aja ah==
> >
>




------------------------------------

Post message: [email protected]
Subscribe   :  [email protected]
Unsubscribe :  [email protected]
List owner  :  [email protected]
Homepage    :  http://proletar.8m.com/Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/proletar/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/proletar/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [email protected] 
    [email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Kirim email ke