Saya senang dengan kalimat ini:
"Taqiyya may be a part of Islamic law, but a noble cause never requires a lie."
Dan jangan kita lupa: seperti telah diingatkan oleh item abu, allah najis yang
disembah orang Islam yang rata-rata dungu-dungu kayak anjing itu diriwayatkan
kitab suci mereka khurafah al-Mushaf sebagai Penipu Akbar ("khayru almakireena")
--- In [email protected], "Nub" <nubtheologian@...> wrote:
>
> artikel yg nanggapin artikel sampahnya john. Isinya ga beda jauh ama
> tanggapan gua ke jon.
> bukan pertama kali si jon lempar artikel sampah, yg dia sendiri ga ngerti
> isinya apa hehe
>
> btw, ada sedikit kesalahan ketik:
> "Of these, Islamic extremists were responsible for 24%, accounting for 2,981
> kills, while non-Muslim attackers racked up 196"
>
> itu bukan 24%, mestinya 94%. di bagian lain diartikel mereka nulis benar 94%.
>
>
> http://thereligionofpeace.com/Articles/Loonwatch-94-Percent.htm
>
> Loonwatch and the Non-Muslim Terrorist
>
> by Glen Roberts, Editor of TheReligionofPeace.com
>
> (May 4, 2013)
>
> The notorious Loonwatch.com site has been claiming for years that 94% of
> all terror attacks have nothing to do with Islam. What they aren't saying is
> that according to their own source, Muslims are 35 times more
> likely to commit acts of terror - and that's just in the United States.
>
>
> Since January, 2010 the Islamic propaganda outlet Loonwatch.com has
> prominently posted an article with the title "All Terrorists are MuslimÂ…
> except the 94% that aren't." Although not saying exactly who it is that
> believes "all terrorists are Muslim", the gist of the piece is that an FBI
> report from seven years ago concluded that the vast majority of attacks have
> nothing to do with Islam.
>
> As Loonwatch puts it:
>
> Only 6% of terror attacks are by Muslims
>
> 7% of terrorism is by Jewish extremists
>
> 66% of terror attacks are by leftists and Latinos
>
> This would appear to defy common sense. Reports of bombings, shootings,
> stabbings and even beheadings by terrorists cross the newswire each day.
> Some are indeed the work of communist groups or nationalists, but the vast
> majority are clearly the product of Islamic extremists who kill in the name
> of religion.
>
> Loonwatch is playing a couple of tricks here - the biggest being that they
> are drawing on domestic data only. In other words, when they say that 94% of
> terrorists aren't Muslim, they actually mean in the United States, where
> terror attacks are relatively rare and Muslims make up only 1% of the
> population.
>
> So, if we ignore the overwhelming bulk of attacks across the globe, Muslims
> are "only" six times more likely to commit acts of terror than the general
> population. The numbers for Loonwatch get even worse on closer examination.
>
> As it turns out, much of the FBI list includes "violence" against property
> rather than people. In fact, the formula used by the agency to define
> terrorism is somewhat fuzzy. While it includes tree-spiking and bank
> robbery, for example, it somehow omits the Arizona assassination of a Sunni
> cleric by Iranian terrorists in 1980, the 1990 murder of Rabbi Kahane by an
> Islamic radical at a New York hotel, and even the killing of two CIA agents
> by a Muslim extremist at Langley in 1993.
>
> When Americans hear the word 'terrorism', however, what comes to mind isn't
> vandalism, but rather those acts of genuine violence that are intended to
> cause loss of life. So, how do we focus on these incidents and filter out
> the rest?
>
> Well, perhaps the best way of knowing whether terrorists are serious about
> killing people is if they actually do. Since Muslims and non-Muslim
> terrorists have equal opportunity to kill, Loonwatch shouldn't object to an
> analysis of only those attacks which cause deaths. What does the data have
> to say when we exclude non-lethal attacks?
>
> Even by the FBI's curious standard, the sort of truly violent terrorism that
> most concerns Americans is extremely rare in the United States. Only 29
> attacks on their list of incidents between 1980 and 2005 resulted in actual
> death. Of these, Islamic extremists were responsible for 24%, accounting for
> 2,981 kills, while non-Muslim attackers racked up 196.
>
> Thus, what the FBI report is really saying is that a demographic which makes
> up only 1% of the American population accounts for one-fourth of all deadly
> terror attacks in the U.S. and 94% of related casualties! (The 94% statistic
> is somewhat ironic because it is the same figure than Loonwatch is touting to
> dispel concerns). The Jewish population in the U.S. is more than twice that
> of Muslims, but there were only three so-called Jewish attacks during the
> entire 25 years (all by the "Jewish Defense League") with a total of three
> killed.
>
> Since 2005, there have been at least six additional deadly attacks that would
> probably qualify as terrorism in the U.S. even to the FBI. One was the 2012
> shooting by a skinhead that resulted in six deaths at a Sikh temple and the
> other five were by Muslims, which left 19 dead. This means that since 1980,
> Muslims in the U.S. have been 35 times more likely to commit terror than all
> other demographics combined.
>
> Now, the point of all this isn't to "prove" that any particular person is
> dangerous. The numbers are quite low and it is unlikely that the Muslim you
> know personally is all that different from you, much less plotting mass
> murder. A person's nominal religion is not grounds for thinking a certain way
> about them or for reaching conclusions that are based on anything other than
> their own words or deeds.
>
> What we are demonstrating is how Muslim propaganda groups like Loonwatch and
> CAIR knowingly manipulate the public into false conclusions about Islam using
> disingenuous methods. They are also dishonest when they try to confuse
> people into thinking that criticism of Islamic bigotry means hatred for
> Muslims.
>
> Taqiyya may be a part of Islamic law, but a noble cause never requires a lie.
>
> Then again... how noble can a religion really be when it's most vocal members
> are far more concerned about image than the dead and dismembered victims of
> the devout?
>
------------------------------------
Post message: [email protected]
Subscribe : [email protected]
Unsubscribe : [email protected]
List owner : [email protected]
Homepage : http://proletar.8m.com/Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/proletar/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/proletar/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
[email protected]
[email protected]
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[email protected]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
