yang tidak ada gunanya dan ngabisin duit itu bukan serdadu plik ... tapi manusia kayak uplik ... kerjaan cuman internetan. hidup dari jaminan sosial.
sok ... guna nya uplik apa coba ? Jangankan untuk dunia atau negara. Bahkan bagi "orang rumah" aja apan uplikmah cuman jadi beban doang. okeh ? --- In [email protected], Bukan Pedanda <bukan.pedanda@...> wrote: > > Di era global village ini perselisihan antara negara sungguh tidak perlu > diselesaikan dengan senjata lagi.. > > Dan serdadu itu sungguh tidakada gunanya lagi. > > Bikin susah aja dan ngabisin duit. > > --- > > China and India's smoldering problem > By Jonathan Levine, Special for CNN > May 20, 2013 -- Updated 1315 GMT (2115 HKT) > Chinese premier goes to India > STORY HIGHLIGHTS > * Chinese premier makes first foreign trip since taking role to India > * Visit comes weeks after Chinese troops crossed the border into India > * Two countries have been involved in a land dispute for more than a > century > * Analyst says there's no appetite for a fight between the two most > populous nations > Editor's note: Jonathan Levine is a freelance journalist and contributing > analyst at the geostrategic > consulting firm Wikistrat. He is a frequent China commentator for > leading international news sites and also works as a lecturer of > American Studies at Tsinghua University in Beijing. You can follow him > on Twitter > @LevineJonathan. > Beijing (CNN) -- Chinese Premier Li Keqiang is in > India on his first foreign trip since assuming the post and has begun > diplomatic talks at a delicate time for the world's two most populous > nations. > Just weeks ago, the world witnessed the latest chapter in one of Asia's least > understood disputes when soldiers from China's People's Liberation Army > crossed the border > and set up an encampment in the mountains at the edge of the Indian > region of Ladakh. > The troops have since > withdrawn, but the incident served as a stark reminder of the smoldering > problem that still bedevils the Asian behemoths. > The origins of the > struggle for this charged corner of the world lies in the realpolitik > and imperialism of the 19th and 20th centuries. > > Jonathan Levine > According to a report by > the U.S. Marine Corps Command and Staff College, the British, installed > in their Indian colony, attempted to demarcate their holdings with the > "Johnson Line." > CNN iReport: Indians protest China's incursion > Drawn by the surveyor, > William Johnson in 1864, it claimed the area known as Aksai Chin as part of > India's Ladakh territory. The British later repudiated the line and, in 1899, > replaced it with the Macartney-MacDonald line. The new line > moved Aksai Chin back to China. > Disputed islands buzzing with activity > Huntsman: China, U.S. interests aligned > Richardson: China could fix Korea crisis > After World War I, the > British reversed themselves again, placing Aksai Chin back in India, but > never made any effort to exert formal authority. In 1947, newly > independent India drew their border to reflect the more generous Johnson Line > even though they had not exerted an iota of control over Aksai > Chin for almost half a century. > The Ladakh incursion puts a wrinkle on what seemed to be a burgeoning era of > Sino-Indian > bonhomie. In recent years, both nations have bent over backwards to > demonstrate their mutual good will. > Bilateral trade is > expected to hit $100 billion by 2015, joint military exercises were held last > year (after previously being suspended) and both sides had agreed > to respect a more favorable boundary for China known as the "Line of > Actual Control." > READ: Does upsetting China matter? > But China's recent advance beyond the de facto border is hardly without > precedent. > According to The Times > of India, China has violated the LAC more than 500 times since 2010. > Though experts have described many of these transgressions as "routine," and > regular military contact exists between the two governments, any > "mistake" that were to occur by the Chinese army on Indian soil could be > volatile. Particularly in China, journalist-stoked jingoism can turn > even the most banal activity into an absurd ballet of face-saving. > Far-fetched? In 2002, > American soldiers in South Korea accidentally ran over and killed two > 14-year-old girls. The Yangju Highway Incident, as it became known, > sparked a fury of anti-American protests and severely tested the > U.S.-Korea relationship -- and America was there legally. How would > India and China resolve a similar incident? > READ: Why America and China can't trust each other > "Mistakes can be made," > said Anil Gupta, professor of strategy & globalization, at the > University of Maryland at College Park and co-founder of the China-India > Institute. "However, I do not believe that either China or India is > looking for a fight." Gupta stressed that China's latest incursion > should be seen in a regional context as a test of "muscle-flexing" and > that its actions were not indicative of any real desire to acquire new > territory. > Muscle-flexing or not, > what is certain is that in recent years China has become a very bad > neighbor. Their Indian claims extend over a 6,530-kilometer (4,057-mile) > border, which includes a sizeable chunk of the Indian state of > Arunachal Pradesh and large swaths of Bhutan. In the last year the world saw > the strident revival of China's long dormant claim to the > Senkaku/Diaoyu Islands, as well as a string of others extending as far > south as the James Shoal, a mere 80 kilometers (50 miles) from the > Malaysian coast. > Mistakes can be made. However, I do not believe that either China or India is > looking for a fight > Anil Gupta, China-India Institute > While the risk of > conflict between China and India will always remain until a final > resolution is reached, going forward, there are reasons to believe that > the two sides will be able to continue on a relatively peaceful track. > China's relationship > with India is far more benign than its one with their other regional > antagonist, Japan. The 1962 Sino-Indian war, fought for this very > territory, is all but forgotten among Chinese citizens, while memories > of Japanese hostilities during World War II are as raw as ever. As the > Sinologist Susan Shirk reported in her book: "China: Fragile > Superpower," China's relationship with Japan is highly sensitive and > thus subject to the counterproductive impulses of popular nationalism. > By contrast, China's relations with India stir no such emotions and are > handled out of the spotlight with greater room to maneuver. > Economics too will > likely promote cooler heads. As Gupta noted, India's importance to China will > only increase as India's economy grows. As a market for exports > and investments, he predicted that India would become an invaluable > partner. "I see the next five years as high risk," said Gupta. "Then I > think we can all be a lot more relaxed." > Unfortunately, it > remains a truism that facts on the ground often move faster than > governments' ability to respond to them. In the absence of a resolution, the > world can only hope that India and China succeed in kicking their > differences down the road indefinitely, because if their dispute ever > does come to a head, the consequences could be catastrophic. > Follow us on Twitter @CNNOpinion. > Join us on Facebook/CNNOpinion. > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > ------------------------------------ Post message: [email protected] Subscribe : [email protected] Unsubscribe : [email protected] List owner : [email protected] Homepage : http://proletar.8m.com/Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/proletar/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/proletar/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: [email protected] [email protected] <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [email protected] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
