Mungkin bs ngasih gambaran apa yg tjd di Mesir

Cairo professor: Muslim Brotherhood "underestimated the degree that they
have alienated just about everybody else in this
country"<http://www.jihadwatch.org/2013/08/cairo-professor-muslim-brotherhood-has-underestimated-the-degree-that-they-have-alienated-just-about.html>

The key paragraph is this one, but this entire analysis is well worth
reading.

"What I mean by that is, one cannot say day after day, as the Muslim
Brothers at both sit-ins have said, that they welcome martyrdom, that they
are more than ready to die for their cause, and they have brought their
wives and children to the sit-ins and they are willing for them to die
also. You cannot say this day after day, and then cry out in horror and
shock: 'Look, the police are killing us!' What happened on Wednesday will
be further unraveled, but this time, the particularly tragic case of the
Muslim Brotherhood shows they have underestimated the degree that they have
alienated just about everybody else in this country."

Abdallah Schleifer, an American convert to Islam, is Professor Emeritus of
Journalism at the American University in Cairo. "Misinformation about
Egypt’s ‘massacre,’" by Abdallah Schleifer in Al
Arabiya<http://english.alarabiya.net/en/views/news/middle-east/2013/08/15/Misinformation-about-Egypt-s-massacre-.html>,
August 15:

No one really knows how many pro-Mursi protestors were killed on Wednesday
– the government says about 270, the Muslim Brotherhood (MB) has been
saying more than 2,000. My assumption is that both parties are lying.

What will be interesting is to see how much attention is paid by the same
American and European political leaders – who responding to disturbing
television images, cannot resist criticizing the government and the armed
forces – to the minister of interior’s announcement Wednesday night that 43
policemen were killed and more than 140 wounded. This came among the 21
police stations attacked upon the orders of the MB, the band that
successfully stormed the Kerdesa police station (not far from the Giza
pyramids), not only killed the policemen on duty there but mutilated their
bodies.

The minister said pretty much what Prime Minister Beblawi had said earlier
in the day – that the government had tried to negotiate a peaceful end to
the sit-ins but the Muslim Brotherhood refused anything less than a return
of Mursi to power. What lends credibility to this claim is that only a few
days ago Ahmed Maher, the founder and co-leader of the April 6 Youth
Movement (the liberal-left group that organized the 2011 demonstrations
against Mubarak), charged that it was the Muslim Brotherhood who were
refusing all compromises and were seeking escalation of the crisis.

The prime minister had gone on to note that while the government had
authorized the security forces to disperse both sit-ins more than a week
ago, they had also decided not to take any action that could and indeed did
turn out to be nasty, during Ramadan or the four days after, in which Eid
al-Fitr celebrations marked the end of Ramadan.

Churches attacked

But what is perhaps the most discomforting news from the interior minister
is that four churches had been torched by pro-Mursi demonstrators. Since
his speech, sources at the Coptic Church say that an additional 13 churches
were attacked but not set on fire.

Already, much earlier in the day – only a few hours after security forces
reinforced by Egyptian army armored vehicles and bulldozers had begun to
move in on both sit-ins – independent sources had reported that three
churches had already been torched. *One would think that these naked acts
of sectarian hatred would be enough to disabuse global spokesmen and much
of the global press from alluding to the “peaceful” and “non-violent”
nature of pro-Mursi protestors.* A colleague has suggested to me that in
these politically-correct days we reserve the name “fascist” only for
violence directed at Jewish synagogues and Muslim mosques.

Stopped reading history?

Have people stopped reading history? Non-violence – pioneered by Mahatma
Gandhi during India’s protracted struggle for independence and later
adopted by Dr. Martin Luther King in the American civil rights struggle –
meant this: sitting or standing and offering no resistance to the British
imperial forces and the American southern police when they would move in to
arrest and often beat up the peaceful non-violent demonstrators.

*Non- violence does not mean building barricades to hold off the Egyptian
riot police and breaking up pavement stones to throw at them*. BBC footage,
shot at the very beginning of the confrontation but curiously not screened
until after many hours of coverage of MB dead and wounded, shows – before a
shot was fired – pro-Mursi demonstrators attacking a bulldozer starting to
break down the barricades with stones and long sticks until police firing
tear gas forced them to retreat.

A BBC TV correspondent trapped with his crew by gunfire directed towards
the roof of the Rabaa al-Adawiya mosque remarked that gunfire was not just
coming in, but also going out, from the mosque at the same time.

More significant is that Egyptian bystanders watching events from their
balconies near the Nasr City intersection said they saw armed men among the
MB protestors. None of this, not to mention the blocking of traffic at
major intersections for four weeks, are examples of the “right to peaceful
assembly” that the U.S. spokesman alluded to in his criticism of the
Egyptian security and armed forces.

In the last weeks of the sit-ins – almost as if to provoke the authorities
into action – the MB would send out groups of a few thousand from either
the Nahda Square sit-in or the Rabaa al-Adawiya sit-in to march upon
government offices. In several cases the marches were confronted not by the
riot police but by Egyptians living in the neighborhoods where the MB
protestors were attempting to assault ministerial buildings. And that is
the element that seems to be missing from so much of the discourse – that
this is not just a conflict between the MB and their Salafist allies with
the armed forces and state security, but a conflict between the MB with
most Egyptians, who are supported by the armed forces –and who according to
public opinion polls, wanted this sit-ins ended and life, tourism and jobs
to come back to normal. And in Cairo that opposition to the MB is
overwhelming.

ElBaradei an opportunist?

That is probably why Mohamed ElBaradei’s resignation on Wednesday as vice
prime minster [sic] had been greeted with contempt by nearly every analyst
on the evening TV talk shows and described as an opportunist, also by the
Tamarod leadership who had hailed ElBaradei only last month as the symbol
of resistance to Muslim Brotherhood rule. ElBaradei said he cannot take
responsibility for the cabinet’s decision to end the sit-ins. But one might
say that is ElBaradei’s way – not taking responsibility, taking on the
leadership of the opposition to Mubarak and then travelling abroad for
weeks on end and not being here to provide that leadership, announcing he
would run for president and then presumably in the face of opposition from
both Mubarkists and the Muslim Brotherhood, withdrawing as a candidate. His
resignation does not come as a surprise.

A massacre is not combat. A massacre is the unprovoked slaughter of
non-violent, peaceful civilians, or of combatants who have already
surrendered. Neither case was applicable on Wednesday. There has been a
tragic loss of life, particularly at Nasr City, but the MB should remember
the saying that sometimes one may not like what one gets, when one gets
what one wishes for.

What I mean by that is, one cannot say day after day, as the Muslim
Brothers at both sit-ins have said, that they welcome martyrdom, that they
are more than ready to die for their cause, and they have brought their
wives and children to the sit-ins and they are willing for them to die
also. You cannot say this day after day, and then cry out in horror and
shock: “Look, the police are killing us!” What happened on Wednesday will
be further unraveled, but this time, the particularly tragic case of the
Muslim Brotherhood shows they have *underestimated the degree that they
have alienated just about everybody else in this country*.

  Posted by Robert <http://www.jihadwatch.org/> on August 15, 2013 4:58 PM


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

Post message: [email protected]
Subscribe   :  [email protected]
Unsubscribe :  [email protected]
List owner  :  [email protected]
Homepage    :  http://proletar.8m.com/Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/proletar/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/proletar/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [email protected] 
    [email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Kirim email ke