Anda itu bukan sekedar dungu Tawang, tapi gila seperti johny-indon. Anda tahu bahwa "belum ada yg meneliti secara serius apakah batuan2 didalam bulan ada bekas bentet."
Tapi seperti orng Islam lain yagn dungu-dungu kayak anjing dan gila juga, anda sudah bisa-bisanya bilagn bahwa foto celah itu adalah bukti bahwa bulan pernah dibelah dua. --- In [email protected], "Tawangalun" <tawangalun@...> wrote: > > Itu biar saya kalau lihat Foto NASA biar bisa langsung tahu Ooo itu > peninggalan Nabi saya dulu,bukan untuk kamu percuma gak akan percoyo. > Lagian kan belum ada yg meneliti secara serius apakah batuan2 didalam bulan > ada bekas bentet. > > Paulus anak wedus. > > > --- In [email protected], itemabu2 <itemabu2@> wrote: > > > > Kalo misal bener si nabi ngebelah bulan lalu nyatuin lagi, ternyata msh ada > > retakan, ebrarti nyatuinnya ga sempurna tuh. Apa emang cuma segitu > > kemampuan auloh yg diwakili nabinya itu? > > > > Lagi pula, yg dianggap sbg bekas nyambung itu ternyata banyak di bulan, ga > > cuma itu aja, nunjukin bhw itu cuma suatu fenomena alam yg biasa di bulan. > > > > > > > > On Sun, Aug 18, 2013 at 10:31 AM, Bukan Pedanda <bukan.pedanda@>wrote: > > > > > ** > > > > > > > > > > > > Sedeng... > > > > > > Baca nih.. > > > > > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Splitting_of_the_moon#Modern_hoax > > > > > > "Modern hoax > > > > > > NASA photograph from Apollo 10 in 1969. A scar on the surface of the moon > > > alleged to be evidence of a healed split > > > > > > Apollo mission photographs of the Rima Ariadaeus revealed a rift line > > > across the surface of the moon. In 2007,[15] Dr. Zaghloul El Najjar used > > > these photos to circulate a hoax, further propagated by news services such > > > as Jafariya News,[16] claiming that NASA had proven that the Moon had > > > split.[17][18] NASA scientists have stated that no evidence exists that > > > Moon was split into two or more parts any time in the past. NASA scientist > > > Brad Bailey commented, "My recommendation is to not believe everything you > > > read on the internet. Peer-reviewed papers are the only scientifically > > > valid sources of information out there. No current scientific evidence > > > reports that the Moon was split into two (or more) parts and then > > > reassembled at any point in the past."[19]" > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "Tawangalun" <tawangalun@> wrote: > > > > > > > > La ini NASA bilang tdk membantah: > > > > > > > > NASA.gov Does Not Deny Moon Split & Moon Was 2 Parts at a ... > > > > ⺠0:08⺠0:08 > > > > www.youtube.com/watch?v=0f5QYkvGv0Qâ > > > > 20 Mei 2010 - Diunggah oleh anashkhss > > > > Quran 54:1 said "... & the Moon was split". The following official > > > website of NASA testify 4 this fact. They ... > > > > > > > > Jadi ocehan ITEM jangan digugu. > > > > > > > > Paulus anak wedus. > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], itemabu2 <itemabu2@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > NASA sdh ngebantah bhw bulan pernah dibelah, jadi ocehan si tawang bhw > > > NASA > > > > > punya bukti tsb adalah kibulan doang. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://lunarscience.nasa.gov/?question=evidence-moon-having-been-split-two > > > > > Evidence of the moon having been split in two > > > > > ** > > > > > > > > > > You've already answered this question in August 2009 but I'd like to > > > > > go > > > > > into more detail. This website: > > > > > > > > http://www.mastikorner.com/forum/islamic-picx/6843-miracle-prophet-muhammad-p-b-u-h.htmlclaims > > > > > that Allah split the Moon in two at the request of the Prophet > > > > > Mohammed and that there is a split on the Moon documented by American > > > > > scientists that goes right around it which is evidence of the miracle. > > > Is > > > > > there any truth to any of these claims? > > > > > > > > > > My recommendation is to not believe everything you read on the > > > internet. > > > > > Peer-reviewed papers are the only scientifically valid sources of > > > > > information out there. No current scientific evidence reports that the > > > Moon > > > > > was split into two (or more) parts and then reassembled at any point > > > in the > > > > > past. > > > > > > > > > > Brad Bailey > > > > > > > > > > NLSI Staff Scientist > > > > > > > > > > June 21, 2010 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2013/8/18 Bukan Pedanda <bukan.pedanda@> > > > > > > > > > > > ** > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Anda jelas sudah gila Tawang. > > > > > > > > > > > > Foto begitu anda jadikan bukti bulan pernah terbelah dua... > > > > > > > > > > > > Sama gilanya seperti johny-indon yang juga pake ilmu cocologi... > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "Tawangalun" <tawangalun@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Wong bekas retakan dibulaan masih ada fotonya kok,jadi malah NASA > > > yg > > > > > > punya bukti bhw bulan pernah terbelah ada riles dipermukaan lurus > > > sepanjang > > > > > > 300 Km.Lagian buat opo miracle Yesus seabrek kalau ditolak oleh > > > > > > bangsane,lalu opo target penyelamatan domba yg hilang dari Israel > > > bisa > > > > > > terwujud?genah belum ada satupun PM Israel sing Kristen gitu lo. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Paulus anak wedus. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], Gabriella Rantau <gkrantau@> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Oom Tawangalun, yg menjadi alasan utama mengapa 'miracles' yg > > > > > > dilakukan oleh Nabi Junjungan itu dinyatakan tidak benar karena Al > > > Qur'an > > > > > > sendiri dengan jelas menyatakan bhw 'Mujizat hanya ada pada > > > > > > Allah'..Sedangkan Al qur'an jelas2 mengisahkan mujizat2 yg dilakukan > > > oleh > > > > > > Isa Al Masih. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Apakah kenyataan ini secara halus mengatakan bhw Isa Al Masih > > > (Yesus > > > > > > Mesias) itu Tuhan? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Wallahualam > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Gabriella > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ________________________________ > > > > > > > > From: Tawangalun <tawangalun@> > > > > > > > > To: [email protected] > > > > > > > > Sent: Saturday, 17 August 2013 1:42 PM > > > > > > > > Subject: [proletar] Re: Qur'an miracles DEBUNKED > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > à > > > > > > > > Loh kenapa Bu Gab percoyo tongkatnya Musa bisa mbelah laut?belum > > > > > > tulah2 lainnya,kenapa Bu Gab percoyo mukjizatnya Yesus? > > > > > > > > Kan gak ada bukti juga. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Paulus anak wedus. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], Gabriella Rantau <gkrantau@> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Bagi yg ingin tahu dan berani untukmengakui bhw klaim Qur'an > > > > > > mengandung ayat2 yg sifatnya scientific, tapi kenyataannya sekedar > > > > > > pengetahuan zaman batu - abad ke-7 silakan klik link berikut ini: > > > > > > http://www.scribd.com/collections/2330324/Koran-Science-Debunked > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Selamat membaca dan mendapat pencerahan. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Gabriella > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > ------------------------------------ Post message: [email protected] Subscribe : [email protected] Unsubscribe : [email protected] List owner : [email protected] Homepage : http://proletar.8m.com/Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/proletar/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/proletar/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: [email protected] [email protected] <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [email protected] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
