Tuh kan, masih aja lu gigih unjuk ketololan. 

Yah, maklum, itu karena otak lu segede biji peler uplik 
makanya lu setiap hari sewot sama sesuatu yang lu akui 
nggak ada. Sewot tiap hari selama bertahun-tahun. 

Kejeblos lagi dah di topik sendiri. 


--- itemabu2 <itemabu2@...> wrote: 


  
Kl orang pake otak dan mempelajari Quran dan hadis dgn sejarahnya dgn benar, 
maka orang emang akan dpt kesimpulan bhw Islam itu cuma rekayasa orang Arab dan 
ajaran Islam itu bejad dan konyol



http://themuslimissue.wordpress.com/2013/09/29/muslim-professor-of-islamic-theology-concludes-after-research-prophet-muhammed-never-existed/


Muslim Professor of Islamic Theology Concludes After Research: Prophet Muhammed 
Never Existed
Posted on September 29, 2013by Admin



Professor Hired for Outreach to Muslims Delivers a Jolt
Islamic Theologian’s Theory: It’s Likely the Prophet Muhammad Never Existed
By  ANDREW HIGGINS  |  The Wall Street Journal
MÜNSTER, Germany — Muhammad Sven Kalisch, a Muslim convert 
and Germany’s first professor of Islamic theology, fasts during the 
Muslim holy month, doesn’t like to shake hands with Muslim women and has spent 
years studying Islamic scripture. Islam, he says, guides his 
life.
So it came as something of a surprise when Prof. Kalisch 
announced the fruit of his theological research. His conclusion: The 
Prophet Muhammad probably never existed.

Muslims, not surprisingly, are outraged. Even Danish cartoonists who 
triggered global protests a couple of years ago didn’t portray the 
Prophet as fictional. German police, worried about a violent backlash, 
told the professor to move his religious-studies center to more-secure 
premises.
“We had no idea he would have ideas like this,” says Thomas Bauer, a 
fellow academic at Münster University who sat on a committee that 
appointed Prof. Kalisch. “I’m a more orthodox Muslim than he is, and I’m not a 
Muslim.”
When Prof. Kalisch took up his theology chair four years ago, he was 
seen as proof that modern Western scholarship and Islamic ways can 
mingle — and counter the influence of radical preachers in Germany. He 
was put in charge of a new program at Münster, one of Germany’s oldest 
and most respected universities, to train teachers in state schools to 
teach Muslim pupils about their faith.
Muslim leaders cheered and joined an advisory board at his Center for Religious 
Studies. Politicians hailed the appointment as a sign of 
Germany’s readiness to absorb some three million Muslims into mainstream 
society. But, says Andreas Pinkwart, a minister responsible for higher 
education in this north German region, “the results are disappointing.”
Prof. Kalisch, who insists he’s still a Muslim, says he knew he would get in 
trouble but wanted to subject Islam to the same scrutiny as Christianity and 
Judaism. German scholars of the 19th century, he notes, were among the first to 
raise questions about the historical accuracy of the Bible.
Many scholars of Islam question the accuracy of ancient sources on 
Muhammad’s life. The earliest biography, of which no copies survive, 
dated from roughly a century after the generally accepted year of his 
death, 632, and is known only by references to it in much later texts. 
But only a few scholars have doubted Muhammad’s existence. Most say his 
life is better documented than that of Jesus.
“Of course Muhammad existed,” says Tilman Nagel, a scholar in 
Göttingen and author of a new book, “Muhammad: Life and Legend.” The 
Prophet differed from the flawless figure of Islamic tradition, Prof. 
Nagel says, but “it is quite astonishing to say that thousands and 
thousands of pages about him were all forged” and there was no such 
person.
All the same, Prof. Nagel has signed a petition in support of Prof. 
Kalisch, who has faced blistering criticism from Muslim groups and some 
secular German academics. “We are in Europe,” Prof. Nagel says. 
“Education is about thinking, not just learning by heart.”
Prof. Kalisch’s religious studies center recently removed a sign and 
erased its address from its Web site. The professor, a burly 
42-year-old, says he has received no specific threats but has been 
denounced as apostate, a capital offense in some readings of Islam.
“Maybe people are speculating that some idiot will come and cut off my head,” 
he said during an interview in his study.
A few minutes later, an assistant arrived in a panic to say a 
suspicious-looking digital clock had been found lying in the hallway. 
Police, called to the scene, declared the clock harmless.
A convert to Islam at age 15, Prof. Kalisch says he was drawn to the 
faith because it seemed more rational than others. He embraced a branch 
of Shiite Islam noted for its skeptical bent. After working briefly as a 
lawyer, he began work in 2001 on a postdoctoral thesis in Islamic law 
in Hamburg, to go through the elaborate process required to become a 
professor in Germany.
The Sept. 11 attacks in the U.S. that year appalled Mr. Kalisch but 
didn’t dent his devotion. Indeed, after he arrived at Münster University in 
2004, he struck some as too conservative. Sami Alrabaa, a scholar at a nearby 
college, recalls attending a lecture by Prof. Kalisch and 
being upset by his doctrinaire defense of Islamic law, known as Sharia.
In private, he was moving in a different direction. He devoured works 
questioning the existence of Abraham, Moses and Jesus. Then “I said to 
myself: You’ve dealt with Christianity and Judaism but what about your 
own religion? Can you take it for granted that Muhammad existed?”
He had no doubts at first, but slowly they emerged. He was struck, he says, by 
the fact that the first coins bearing Muhammad’s name did not 
appear until the late 7th century — six decades after the religion did.
He traded ideas with some scholars in Saarbrücken who in recent years have been 
pushing the idea of Muhammad’s nonexistence. They claim that 
“Muhammad” wasn’t the name of a person but a title, and that Islam began as a 
Christian heresy.
Prof. Kalisch didn’t buy all of this. Contributing last year to a 
book on Islam, he weighed the odds and called Muhammad’s existence “more 
probable than not.” By early this year, though, his thinking had 
shifted. “The more I read, the historical person at the root of the 
whole thing became more and more improbable,” he says.
He has doubts, too, about the Quran. “God doesn’t write books,” Prof. Kalisch 
says.
Some of his students voiced alarm at the direction of his teaching. 
“I began to wonder if he would one day say he doesn’t exist himself,” 
says one. A few boycotted his lectures. Others sang his praises.
Prof. Kalisch says he “never told students ‘just believe what Kalisch thinks’ ” 
but seeks to teach them to think independently. Religions, he says, are 
“crutches” that help believers get to “the spiritual truth 
behind them.” To him, what matters isn’t whether Muhammad actually lived but 
the philosophy presented in his name.
This summer, the dispute hit the headlines. A Turkish-language German newspaper 
reported on it with gusto. Media in the Muslim world picked 
up on it.
Germany’s Muslim Coordinating Council withdrew from the advisory 
board of Prof. Kalisch’s center. Some Council members refused to address him by 
his adopted Muslim name, Muhammad, saying that he should now be 
known as Sven.
German academics split. Michael Marx, a Quran scholar at the 
Berlin-Brandenburg Academy of Sciences, warned that Prof. Kalisch’s 
views would discredit German scholarship and make it difficult for 
German scholars to work in Muslim lands. But Ursula Spuler-Stegemann, an 
Islamic studies scholar at the University of Marburg, set up a Web site called 
solidaritymuhammadkalisch.com and started an online petition of 
support.
Alarmed that a pioneering effort at Muslim outreach was only stoking 
antagonism, Münster University decided to douse the flames. Prof. 
Kalisch was told he could keep his professorship but must stop teaching 
Islam to future school teachers.
The professor says he’s more determined than ever to keep probing his faith. He 
is finishing a book to explain his thoughts. It’s in English 
instead of German because he wants to make a bigger impact. “I’m 
convinced that what I’m doing is necessary. There must be a free 
discussion of Islam,” he says.
—Almut Schoenfeld in Berlin contributed to this article.

Kirim email ke