Text of Ahmadinejad’s letter to Bush

Mr George Bush, President of the United States of America

For sometime now I have been thinking, how one can justify the undeniable 
contradictions that exist in the international arena -- which are being 
constantly debated, specially in political forums and amongst university 
students. Many questions remain unanswered. These have prompted me to 
discuss some of the contradictions and questions, in the hopes that it might 
bring about an opportunity to redress them.

Can one be a follower of Jesus Christ (PBUH), the great Messenger of God, 
Feel obliged to respect human rights, Present liberalism as a civilization 
model, Announce one’s opposition to the proliferation of nuclear weapons and 
WMDs, Make “War and Terror” his slogan, And finally,

Work towards the establishment of a unified international community – a 
community which Christ and the virtuous of the Earth will one day govern, 
But at the same time, Have countries attacked; The lives, reputations and 
possessions of people destroyed and on the slight chance of the … of a … 
criminals in a village city, or convoy for example the entire village, city 
or convey set ablaze. Or because of the possibility of the existence of WMDs 
in one country, it is occupied, around one hundred thousand people killed, 
its water sources, agriculture and industry destroyed, close to 180,000 
foreign troops put on the ground, sanctity of private homes of citizens 
broken, and the country pushed back perhaps fifty years. At what price? 
Hundreds of billions of dollars spent from the treasury of one country and 
certain other countries and tens of thousands of young men and women – as 
occupation troops – put in harms way, taken away from family and love ones, 
their hands stained with the blood of others, subjected to so much 
psychological pressure that everyday some commit suicide ant those returning 
home suffer depression, become sickly and grapple with all sorts of 
aliments; while some are killed and their bodies handed of their families.

On the pretext of the existence of WMDs, this great tragedy came to engulf 
both the peoples of the occupied and the occupying country. Later it was 
revealed that no WMDs existed to begin with. Of course Saddam was a 
murderous dictator. But the war was not waged to topple him, the announced 
goal of the war was to find and destroy weapons of mass destruction. He was 
toppled along the way towards another goal, nevertheless the people of the 
region are happy about it. I point out that throughout the many years of the 
… war on Iran Saddam was supported by the West.

Mr President,

You might know that I am a teacher. My students ask me how can theses 
actions be reconciled with the values outlined at the beginning of this 
letter and duty to the tradition of Jesus Christ (PBUH), the Messenger of 
peace and forgiveness. There are prisoners in Guantanamo Bay that have not 
been tried, have no legal representation, their families cannot see them and 
are obviously kept in a strange land outside their own country. There is no 
international monitoring of their conditions and fate. No one knows whether 
they are prisoners, POWs, accused or criminals.

European investigators have confirmed the existence of secret prisons in 
Europe too. I could not correlate the abduction of a person, and him or her 
being kept in secret prisons, with the provisions of any judicial system. 
For that matter, I fail to understand how such actions correspond to the 
values outlined in the beginning of this letter, i.e. the teachings of Jesus 
Christ (PBUH), human rights and liberal values.

Young people, university students and ordinary people have many questions 
about the phenomenon of Israel. I am sure you are familiar with some of 
them. Throughout history many countries have been occupied, but I think the 
establishment of a new country with a new people, is a new phenomenon that 
is exclusive to our times.

Students are saying that sixty years ago such a country did no exist. They 
show old documents and globes and say try as we have, we have not been able 
to find a country named Israel. I tell them to study the history of WWI and 
II. One of my students told me that during WWII, which more than tens of 
millions of people perished in, news about the war, was quickly disseminated 
by the warring parties. Each touted their victories and the most recent 
battlefront defeat of the other party. After the war, they claimed that six 
million Jews had been killed. Six million people that were surely related to 
at least two million families.

Again let us assume that these events are true. Does that logically 
translate into the establishment of the state of Israel in the Middle East 
or support for such a state? How can this phenomenon be rationalised or 
explained?

Mr President,

I am sure you know how – and at what cost – Israel was established: - Many 
thousands were killed in the process. - Millions of indigenous people were 
made refugees. - Hundred of thousands of hectares of farmland, olive 
plantations, towns and villages were destroyed.

This tragedy is not exclusive to the time of establishment; unfortunately it 
has been ongoing for sixty years now. A regime has been established which 
does not show mercy even to kids, destroys houses while the occupants are 
still in them, announces beforehand its list and plans to assassinate 
Palestinian figures and keeps thousands of Palestinians in prison. Such a 
phenomenon is unique – or at the very least extremely rare – in recent 
memory.

Another big question asked by people is why is this regime being supported? 
Is support for this regime in line with the teachings of Jesus Christ (PBUH) 
or Moses (PBUH) or liberal values? Or are we to understand that allowing the 
original inhabitants of these lands – inside and outside Palestine – whether 
they are Christian, Muslim or Jew, to determine their fate, runs contrary to 
principles of democracy, human rights and the teachings of prophets? If not, 
why is there so much opposition to a referendum?

The newly elected Palestinian administration recently took office. All 
independent observes have confirmed that this government represents the 
electorate. Unbelievingly, they have put the elected government under 
pressure and have advised it to recognise the Israeli regime, abandon the 
struggle and follow the programs of the previous government.

If the current Palestinian government had run on the above platform, would 
the Palestinian people have voted for it? Again, can such position taken in 
opposition to the Palestinian government be reconciled with the values 
outlined earlier? The people are also saying “why are all UNSC resolutions 
in condemnation of Israel vetoed?”

Mr President,

As you are well aware, I live amongst the people and am in constant contact 
with them -- many people from around the Middle East manage to contact me as 
well. They dot not have faith in these dubious policies either. There is 
evidence that the people of the region are becoming increasingly angry with 
such policies. It is not my intention to pose to many questions, but I need 
to refer to other points as well.

Why is it that any technological and scientific achievement reached in the 
Middle East regions is translated into and portrayed as a threat to the 
Zionist regime? Is not scientific R&D one of the basic rights of nations?

You are familiar with history. Aside from the Middle Ages, in what other 
point in history has scientific and technical progress been a crime? Can the 
possibility of scientific achievements being utilised for military purposes 
be reason enough to oppose science and technology altogether? If such a 
supposition is true, then all scientific disciplines, including physics, 
chemistry, mathematics, medicine, engineering, etc. must be opposed.

Lies were told in the Iraqi matter. What was the result? I have no doubt 
that telling lies is reprehensible in any culture, and you do not like to be 
lied to.

Mr President,

Don’t Latin Americans have the right to ask, why their elected governments 
are being opposed and coup leaders supported? Or, why must they constantly 
be threatened and live in fear?

The people of Africa are hardworking, creative and talented. They can play 
an important and valuable role in providing for the needs of humanity and 
contribute to its material and spiritual progress. Poverty and hardship in 
large parts of Africa are preventing this from happening. Don’t they have 
the right to ask why their enormous wealth – including minerals – is being 
looted, despite the fact that they need it more than others? Again, do such 
actions correspond to the teachings of Christ and the tenets of human 
rights?

The brave and faithful people of Iran too have many questions and 
grievances, including: the coup d’etat of 1953 and the subsequent toppling 
of the legal government of the day, opposition to the Islamic revolution, 
transformation of an Embassy into a headquarters supporting, the activities 
of those opposing the Islamic Republic (many thousands of pages of documents 
corroborates this claim), support for Saddam in the war waged against Iran, 
the shooting down of the Iranian passenger plane, freezing the assets of the 
Iranian nation, increasing threats, anger and displeasure vis-à-vis the 
scientific and nuclear progress of the Iranian nation (just when all 
Iranians are jubilant and collaborating their country’s progress), and many 
other grievances that I will not refer to in this letter.

Mr President,

September Eleven was a horrendous incident. The killing of innocents is 
deplorable and appalling in any part of the world. Our government 
immediately declared its disgust with the perpetrators and offered its 
condolences to the bereaved and expressed its sympathies.

All governments have a duty to protect the lives, property and good standing 
of their citizens. Reportedly your government employs extensive security, 
protection and intelligence systems – and even hunts its opponents abroad. 
September eleven was not a simple operation. Could it be planned and 
executed without coordination with intelligence and security services – or 
their extensive infiltration? Of course this is just an educated guess. Why 
have the various aspects of the attacks been kept secret? Why are we not 
told who botched their responsibilities? And, why aren’t those responsible 
and the guilty parties identified and put on trial? All governments have a 
duty to provide security and peace of mind for their citizens. For some 
years now, the people of your country and neighbours of world trouble spots 
do not have peace of mind. After 9.11, instead of healing and tending to the 
emotional wounds of the survivors and the American people – who had been 
immensely traumatised by the attacks – some Western media only intensified 
the climates of fear and insecurity – some constantly talked about the 
possibility of new terror attacks and kept the people in fear. Is that 
service to the American people? Is it possible to calculate the damages 
incurred from fear and panic? American citizen lived in constant fear of 
fresh attacks that could come at any moment and in any place. They felt 
insecure in the streets, in their place of work and at home. Who would be 
happy with this situation? Why was the media, instead of conveying a feeling 
of security and providing peace of mind, giving rise to a feeling of 
insecurity?

Some believe that the hype paved the way – and was the justification – for 
an attack on Afghanistan. Again I need to refer to the role of media. In 
media charters, correct dissemination of information and honest reporting of 
a story are established tenets. I express my deep regret about the disregard 
shown by certain Western media for these principles. The main pretext for an 
attack on Iraq was the existence of WMDs. This was repeated incessantly – 
for the public to, finally, believe – and the ground set for an attack on 
Iraq. Will the truth not be lost in a contrive and deceptive climate? Again, 
if the truth is allowed to be lost, how can that be reconciled with the 
earlier mentioned values? Is the truth known to the Almighty lost as well?

Mr President,

In countries around the world, citizens provide for the expenses of 
governments so that their governments in turn are able to serve them. The 
question here is “what has the hundreds of billions of dollars, spent every 
year to pay for the Iraqi campaign, produced for the citizens?”

As your Excellency is aware, in some states of your country, people are 
living in poverty. Many thousands are homeless and unemployment is a huge 
problem. Of course these problems exist – to a larger or lesser extent – in 
other countries as well. With these conditions in mind, can the gargantuan 
expenses of the campaign – paid from the public treasury – be explained and 
be consistent with the aforementioned principles?

What has been said, are some of the grievances of the people around the 
world, in our region and in your country. But my main contention – which I 
am hoping you will agree to some of it – is:

Those in power have specific time in office, and do not rule indefinitely, 
but their names will be recorded in history and will be constantly judged in 
the immediate and distant futures.

The people will scrutinize our presidencies.

Did we manage to bring peace, security and prosperity for the people or 
insecurity and unemployment? Did we intend to establish justice, or just 
supported especial interest groups, and by forcing many people to live in 
poverty and hardship, made a few people rich and powerful – thus trading the 
approval of the people and the Almighty with theirs’? Did we defend the 
rights of the underprivileged or ignore them?

Did we defend the rights of all people around the world or imposed wars on 
them, interfered illegally in their affairs, established hellish prisons and 
incarcerated some of them? Did we bring the world peace and security or 
raised the specter of intimidation and threats? Did we tell the truth to our 
nation and others around the world or presented an inverted version of it? 
Were we on the side of people or the occupiers and oppressors? Did our 
administration set out to promote rational behaviour, logic, ethics, peace, 
fulfilling obligations, justice, service to the people, prosperity, progress 
and respect for human dignity or the force of guns.

Intimidation, insecurity, disregard for the people, delaying the progress 
and excellence of other nations, and trample on people’s rights? And 
finally, they will judge us on whether we remained true to our oath of 
office – to serve the people, which is our main task, and the traditions of 
the prophets – or not?

Mr President,

How much longer can the world tolerate this situation? Where will this trend 
lead the world to? How long must the people of the world pay for the 
incorrect decisions of some rulers? How much longer will the specter of 
insecurity – raised from the stockpiles of weapons of mass destruction – 
hunt the people of the world? How much longer will the blood of the innocent 
men, women and children be spilled on the streets, and people’s houses 
destroyed over their heads? Are you pleased with the current condition of 
the world? Do you think present policies can continue?

If billions of dollars spent on security, military campaigns and troop 
movement were instead spent on investment and assistance for poor countries, 
promotion of health, combating different diseases, education and improvement 
of mental and physical fitness, assistance to the victims of natural 
disasters, creation of employment opportunities and production, development 
projects and poverty alleviation, establishment of peace, mediation between 
disputing states and distinguishing the flames of racial, ethnic and other 
conflicts were would the world be today? Would not your government, and 
people be justifiably proud? Would not your administration’s political and 
economic standing have been stronger? And I am most sorry to say, would 
there have been an ever increasing global hatred of the American 
governments?

Mr President,

it is not my intention to distress anyone. If prophet Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, 
Ishmael, Joseph or Jesus Christ (PBUH) were with us today, how would they 
have judged such behaviour? Will we be given a role to play in the promised 
world, where justice will become universal and Jesus Christ (PBUH) will be 
present? Will they even accept us?

My basic question is this: Is there no better way to interact with the rest 
of the world? Today there are hundreds of millions of Christians, hundreds 
of millions of Moslems and millions of people who follow the teachings of 
Moses (PBUH). All divine religions share and respect on word and that is 
“monotheism” or belief in a single God and no other in the world. The holy 
Koran stresses this common word and calls on an followers of divine 
religions and says:

[3.64] Say: O followers of the Book! Come to an equitable proposition 
between us and you that we shall not serve any but Allah and (that) we shall 
not associate aught. With Him and (that) some of us shall not take others 
for lords besides Allah, but if they turn back, then say: Bear witness that 
we are Muslims. (The Family of Imran).

Mr President,

According to divine verses, we have all been called upon to worship one God 
and follow the teachings of divine prophets.

“To worship a God which is above all powers in the world and can do all He 
pleases.” “The Lord which knows that which is hidden and visible, the past 
and the future, knows what goes on in the Hearts of His servants and records 
their deeds.” “The Lord who is the possessor of the heavens and the earth 
and all universe is His court” “planning for the universe is done by His 
hands, and gives His servants the glad tidings of mercy and forgiveness of 
sins”. “He is the companion of the oppressed and the enemy of oppressors”. 
“He is the Compassionate, the Merciful”. “He is the recourse of the faithful 
and guides them towards the light from darkness”. “He is witness to the 
actions of His servants”, “He calls on servants to be faithful and do good 
deeds, and asks them to stay on the path of righteousness and remain 
steadfast”. “Calls on servants to heed His prophets and He is a witness to 
their deeds.” “A bad ending belongs only to those who have chosen the life 
of this world and disobey Him and oppress His servants”. And “A good and 
eternal paradise belong to those servants who fear His majesty and do not 
follow their lascivious selves.”

We believe a return to the teachings of the divine prophets is the only road 
leading to salvations. I have been told that Your Excellency follows the 
teachings of Jesus (PBUH), and believes in the divine promise of the rule of 
the righteous on Earth. We also believe that Jesus Christ (PBUH) was one of 
the great prophets of the Almighty. He has been repeatedly praised in the 
Koran. Jesus (PBUH) has been quoted in Koran as well;

[19,36] And surely Allah is my Lord and your Lord, therefore serves Him; 
this is the right path, Marium.

Service to and obedience of the Almighty is the credo of all divine 
messengers. The God of all people in Europe, Asia, Africa, America, the 
Pacific and the rest of the world is one. He is the Almighty who wants to 
guide and give dignity to all His servants. He has given greatness to 
Humans.

We again read in the Holy Book: “The Almighty God sent His prophets with 
miracles and clear signs to guide the people and show them divine signs and 
purity them from sins and pollutions. And He sent the Book and the balance 
so that the people display justice and avoid the rebellious.”

All of the above verses can be seen, one way or the other, in the Good Book 
as well. Divine prophets have promised:

The day will come when all humans will congregate before the court of the 
Almighty, so that their deeds are examined. The good will be directed 
towards Haven and evildoers will meet divine retribution. I trust both of us 
believe in such a day, but it will not be easy to calculate the actions of 
rulers, because we must be answerable to our nations and all others whose 
lives have been directly or indirectly effected by our actions. All 
prophets, speak of peace and tranquillity for man – based on monotheism, 
justice and respect for human dignity.

Do you not think that if all of us come to believe in and abide by these 
principles, that is, monotheism, worship of God, justice, respect for the 
dignity of man, belief in the Last Day, we can overcome the present problems 
of the world – that are the result of disobedience to the Almighty and the 
teachings of prophets – and improve our performance? Do you not think that 
belief in these principles promotes and guarantees peace, friendship and 
justice? Do you not think that the aforementioned written or unwritten 
principles are universally respected? Will you not accept this invitation? 
That is, a genuine return to the teachings of prophets, to monotheism and 
justice, to preserve human dignity and obedience to the Almighty and His 
prophets?

Mr President,

History tells us that repressive and cruel governments do not survive. God 
has entrusted The fate of man to them. The Almighty has not left the 
universe and humanity to their own devices. Many things have happened 
contrary to the wishes and plans of governments. These tell us that there is 
a higher power at work and all events are determined by Him. Can one deny 
the signs of change in the world today? Is this situation of the world today 
comparable to that of ten years ago? Changes happen fast and come at a 
furious pace.

The people of the world are not happy with the status quo and pay little 
heed to the promises and comments made by a number of influential world 
leaders. Many people around the world feel insecure and oppose the spreading 
of insecurity and war and do not approve of and accept dubious policies. The 
people are protesting the increasing gap between the haves and the have-nots 
and the rich and poor countries.

The people are disgusted with increasing corruption. The people of many 
countries are angry about the attacks on their cultural foundations and the 
disintegration of families. They are equally dismayed with the fading of 
care and compassion. The people of the world have no faith in international 
organisations, because their rights are not advocated by these 
organisations. Liberalism and Western style democracy have not been able to 
help realize the ideals of humanity. Today these two concepts have failed. 
Those with insight can already hear the sounds of the shattering and fall of 
the ideology and thoughts of the liberal democratic systems. We increasingly 
see that people around the world are flocking towards a main focal point – 
that is the Almighty God. Undoubtedly through faith in God and the teachings 
of the prophets, the people will conquer their problems. My question for you 
is: “Do you not want to join them?”

Mr President,

Whether we like it or not, the world is gravitating towards faith in the 
Almighty and justice and the will of God will prevail over all things.

Vasalam Ala Man Ataba’al hoda

Mahmood Ahmadi-Najad

President of the Islamic Republic of Iran

(Source: Le Monde)
http://www.tehrantimes.com/Description.asp?Da=5/10/2006&Cat=2&Num=12




------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
Get to your groups with one click. Know instantly when new email arrives
http://us.click.yahoo.com/.7bhrC/MGxNAA/yQLSAA/uTGrlB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

Post message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe   :  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe :  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
List owner  :  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Homepage    :  http://proletar.8m.com/ 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/proletar/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Kirim email ke