On 20 Jun 06, at 9:55, Battle Normandy wrote:
> duh ini judul kok jadi hina hina orang yak...hehehe...
> gpp lah namanya juga milis baku hantam...
>
> mengenai 'al mushaf' yg dikau sebut2 barusan, apakah bisa
> dijadikan patokan untuk seisi ajaran islam?
> apakah hanya itu yg bisa dilihat?
> apakah tidak ada kebaikan yg lain?
> apakah hanya dilihat dari keburukannya?
> nyatanya banyak orang islam yg hidupnya baik2 aja tuh...
>
Kebaikan yang ada di al-Mushaf itu tidak menutup kedunguan,
kekejaman, kebuasan, kekejian dan kebiadaban yang ada di
al-Mushaf...
>
>
> --- In [email protected], "Jusfiq Hadjar"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Yang menjadi masaalah dengan Islam itu adalah ajarannya
> yang
> > absurd, buas, ganas, kejam, keji lagi biadab....
> >
> > al-Mushaf itu, antara lain, menyuruh manusia berperang,
> artinya
> > saling berbunuhan...
> >
> > al-Mushaf juga menyuruh memotong tangan pencuri..
> >
> > al-Mushaf menyuruh suami menabok istri yang bandel...
> >
> > Dan contoh lain masih banyak kok..
> >
> >
> > On 20 Jun 06, at 8:28, Battle Normandy wrote:
> >
> > > ya didalam tiap agama, banyak kebaikannya...
> > > keburukannya muncul ketika si penganutnya melakukan
> hal2 yg
> > > tidak baik.
> > > misal:
> > > Amir adalah tukang copet.
> > > Amir beragama islam.
> > > orang Islam = tukang copet?
> > > ya engak donk...
> > >
> > > Bush adalah orang kristen.
> > > Bush adalah seorang teroris.
> > > semua orang kristen = teroris?
> > > ya belum tentu.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --- In [email protected], <id@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Kalau kelompok islam garis keras cukup mengatakan
> "Apa
> > > untungnya mengambil
> > > > perkataan kuffar ? kalau masih banyak kebaikan yang bisa
> > > didapat didalam
> > > > ISLAM ??"
> > > >
> > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > From: "Battle Normandy" <regiment1944@>
> > > > To: <[email protected]>
> > > > Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2006 4:36 PM
> > > > Subject: [islamkristen] Re: LIMA METODE MENGHADAPI
> > > MILITANSI GARIS KERAS
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > hhehehe...
> > > > gue mau nanggepin pernyataan om hidayat.
> > > > cara menghadapi misionaris ga tahu diri:
> > > > 1. bilang aja sibuk
> > > > 2. bilang kita gak butuh ajaran dia
> > > > 3. panggilin satpam/ hansip bilang dia mengganggu
> > > ketertiban
> > > > umum...
> > > > 4. cuekin....tinggal jalan.
> > > > 5. teriakin: 'copeeettt!!!'
> > > >
> > > > nah untuk militansi islam, tidak bisa disamaratakan bahwa
> > > > semua islam adalah militan, dan semua militan adalah
> islam.
> > > > itu namanya generalisasi emosional...
> > > > banyak kenyataan menunjukan islam adalah ajaran yg
> > > > rahmatan lil alamin.
> > > >
> > > > lihat jumlah militan2 di negara2 dunia, sebut saja Macan
> > > Tamil
> > > > (Hindu), Regime Pol Pot (Buddhist/sosialis),
> IRA(Protestan),
> > > > ETA Basque (animis dan kristen), Republika Serbska
> (kristen
> > > > orthodox), Kuklux Klan (kristen), Tupac Amaru(animis,
> katolik
> > > > sosialis), dan terakhir Al Qaeda(islam)...
> > > > dihitung banyakan yg mana...
> > > > berhubung media2 barat memang sedang gencar
> membuat
> > > > permusuhan dgn islam, kesannya seolah2 militan2
> adalah
> > > > hanya islam...
> > > > sampai skrg, pemerintah Nepal masih saja berkutat dgn
> > > Maois
> > > > (sosialis hindu budha)...bukan islam kan?
> > > > hehehe...
> > > >
> > > > tapi untuk strategi militansi islam di indonesia ini yg
> sedang
> > > > marak2nya, saya setuju dgn gaya Harto dan Chirac...
> > > > tapi lebih dulu, orang2 yg masih miskin2 dan bodoh2 itu
> > > > ditingkatkan taraf hidupnya...dikasih kerjaan dll biar
> berguna
> > > utk
> > > > nusa dan bangsa...dan hentikan korupsi!
> > > >
> > > > just my 2 cents...
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --- In [email protected], "Nataatmaja,
> Hidayat"
> > > > <hnataatmaja@> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > pernah baca ttg cara menghadang missionaris dlm
> rangka
> > > > kristenisasi gak dun:-)....
> > > > >
> > > > > tau missionaries kan? yg suka nyerobot2 ke rumah
> orang
> > > > bawa indomie pake jilbab?
> > > > >
> > > > > caranya ada beberapa:
> > > > > - suruh mereka buka kitab kidung agung
> > > > > - suruh mereka pulang baik-baik
> > > > > - pasang larangan di depan rumah2 muslim dgn tulisan
> > > > "missionaries dilarang nyogok" atau...
> > > > > - langsung ditendang
> > > > >
> > > > > pilih mana...
> > > > >
> > > > > kalau mau melihat akibat suatu keadaan,cobalah lihat
> > > > penyebabnya lebih dulu...baru cuap2.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > From: [email protected]
> > > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
> > > > pemerhatidunia
> > > > > Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2006 1:36 PM
> > > > > To: [email protected]
> > > > > Subject: [islamkristen] LIMA METODE MENGHADAPI
> > > MILITANSI
> > > > ISLAM GARIS KERAS
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Menghadapi militansi dan syariatisasi Islam di negara
> kita,
> > > > mungkin
> > > > > kita bisa belajar pada negara2 lain.
> > > > >
> > > > > Dimana-mana, Islam BERPELUANG menghasilkan
> > > militansi
> > > > dan
> > > > > pemberontakan bersenjata. Tidak salah bila orang Islam
> > > > berjihad
> > > > > mengikuti petunjuk Al-Qur'an dan hadis secara literal
> tanpa
> > > > dimaknai
> > > > > dengan baik. Bisa menguasai negara dan mengubah
> UUD
> > > > sampai ke semua
> > > > > UU yang ada,
> > > > >
> > > > > (lalu hasilnya makin terpuruk, sebab kata Syafii Maarif itu
> > > > adalah
> > > > > ijtihad abad pertengahan yg tentu saja tidak cocok untuk
> > > duinia
> > > > > modern !! ketiwasan sudah jatuh banyak korban :-G )
> > > > > Coba baca juga Media Indonesia hari ini, tulisan Luthfi
> > > > Assyaukanie
> > > > > ttg Islam Liberal untuk Demokrasi Liberal. (Demokrasi
> > > Liberal
> > > > ini
> > > > > adalah sistem yang sukses dipakai dalam dunia
> > > internasional
> > > > saat
> > > > > ini).
> > > > >
> > > > > Islam merupakan ideologi politik. Artinya gerakan
> militansi
> > > > Islam
> > > > > ini ancaman politik.
> > > > >
> > > > > MAKA ada lima strategi dasar yang dipakai2 negara2
> > > > non-muslim untuk
> > > > > menghadapi ancaman Islamisasi dan militansi Islam:
> > > > >
> > > > > 1. Rusia: menindas
> > > > > 2. China: menghapus dan menggantinya dengan
> kemajuan
> > > > dan budaya
> > > > > lain.
> > > > > 3. Chirac/Prancis : membiarkan saja
> > > > > 4. Sharon/Israel : memagari
> > > > > 5. Blair Inggris /Bush USA : me reform.
> > > > >
> > > > > pilih mana?? `
> > > > >
> > > > > http://www.scaruffi
> > > > <http://www.scaruffi.com/politics/world06.html#wor0206>
> > > > .com/politics/world06.html#wor0206
> > > > > (february 2006) Survival strategies for the non-Islamic
> world
> > > > and
> > > > > for the Islamic world. The world has roughly tried five
> > > strategies
> > > > > to deal with the Islamic world: bomb (Russia), erase
> (China),
> > > > ignore
> > > > > (Chirac), fence (Sharon) and reform (Blair/Bush).
> > > > >
> > > > > METODE 1 SOVIET/RUSSIA -- dihabisi, ditakuti dengan
> > > > kekerasan,
> > > > > dipaksa mengubah masjid menjadi tempat budaya,
> bukan
> > > > tempat ibadah.
> > > > >
> > > > > The Soviet Union and now Russia have resorted to
> massive
> > > > violence in
> > > > > order to restrain Islam and basically turn it into a secular
> > > > > movement. They taught the Muslims of Central Asia that
> > > > mosques and
> > > > > madrasas are cultural monuments, not religious sites.
> This
> > > > has
> > > > > largely worked: none of the former Soviet republics has a
> > > > majority
> > > > > of practicing Muslims.
> > > > >
> > > > > METODE 2 CHINA -- dihapus dengan segala kemajuan
> > > > ekonomi, disebar,
> > > > > diisi etnis non muslim yang lebih damai. Ini metode yang
> > > > sukses di
> > > > > Indonesia, ketika Pak Harto sukses membangun, tidak
> ada
> > > > ulama garis
> > > > > keras yang muncul, tetapi ketika krisis, maka Islam garis
> > > > keras
> > > > > berani muncul lagi. begitu kan??
> > > > >
> > > > > China first tried the Soviet method, but apparently it has
> been
> > > > more
> > > > > successful using the method first experimented by Hu
> > > Jingtao
> > > > in
> > > > > Tibet: erase the culture by improving the economic
> > > conditions,
> > > > by
> > > > > creating economic opportunities for the Muslims
> themselves
> > > > and, last
> > > > > but not least, by relocating masses of non-Muslims into
> > > > Islamic
> > > > > lands. Opposition to Chinese domination of Turkestan
> has
> > > > largely
> > > > > faded because everywhere in Turkestan the Muslim
> > > population
> > > > wants to
> > > > > live in the newly rebuilt Chinese areas (broad clean
> avenues,
> > > > > shopping malls, high-rise apartment buildings, modern
> > > > schools and
> > > > > hospitals) not in the old Muslim quarters (narrow dirty
> noisy
> > > > > streets and poor decaying infrastructure). And, in any
> case,
> > > > there
> > > > > will soon be more ethnic Chinese than ethnic Turks
> (more
> > > > non-Muslims
> > > > > than Muslims).
> > > > >
> > > > > METODE 3 SHARON/ISRAEL -- dipagari saja, sama spt
> > > > Prancis dan Eropa
> > > > > Timur yang membuat pagar untuk menghadang serbuan
> > > > pasukan Muslim.
> > > > > Jangan kontak dengan islam.
> > > > >
> > > > > Sharon's fence is a broader metaphor for a desperate
> view of
> > > > the
> > > > > relationships between the Islamic world and the
> non-Islamic
> > > > world.
> > > > > The fence symbolizes the desire to just stop every
> possible
> > > > contact
> > > > > with Muslims. Contrary to what your average Islamic
> > > > propagandist
> > > > > tells you, Israel is ideologically opposed to the
> indiscriminate
> > > > > killing of Muslim civilians. A democracy just cannot do
> that
> > > > without
> > > > > alienating the support of its own electoral base. Thus
> Israel
> > > > cannot
> > > > > use the Soviet system. It cannot use the Chinese system
> > > > either,
> > > > > because it does not have the huge Chinese population to
> > > > settle in
> > > > > Muslim areas. Therefore Israel had to come up with a
> > > different
> > > > > solution. Sharon's fence is the first rational solution that
> > > Israel
> > > > > came up with.
> > > > >
> > > > > METODE 4 CHIRAC -- to ignore the Islamic world, do
> > > business
> > > > with
> > > > > their dictators. Daripada susah diubahnya (Islam itu
> > > > peradaban
> > > > > zaman batu yang susah berubah, kata orang Eropa yg
> > > > berpengalaman
> > > > > menjajah kita ratusan tahun), susah ngurusin manusia
> > > zaman
> > > > batu
> > > > > kepala batu, jadi mendingan kerjasama dengan diktator2
> > > > Islam,
> > > > > lupakan saja itu massa Islam, biarkan mereka ditindas
> > > > diperas oleh
> > > > > diktator2 Islam itu sendiri.
> > > > >
> > > > > Chirac's model is the good old European model: live and
> let
> > > > live.
> > > > > Chirac wants the west to ignore the Islamic world, do
> > > business
> > > > with
> > > > > their dictators (which really means "import oil" because
> the
> > > > Islamic
> > > > > world buys or sells very little else) and let their dictators
> and
> > > > > clerics do what they will. This view was very popular with
> > > > Europeans
> > > > > because Europeans thought it was not worth "saving" the
> > > > Islamic
> > > > > world. Many Europeans view the Islamic world as a
> > > stone-age
> > > > world
> > > > > that cannot be easily reformed, and in any case should
> not
> > > be
> > > > > reformed by outsiders. Having had centuries of
> experience
> > > > when
> > > > > European countries colonized the world, Europeans talk
> > > > because of
> > > > > more or less direct experience.
> > > > >
> > > > > METODE 5 : BUSH - reform the Islamic world according
> to
> > > the
> > > > > democratic values of the Christian world -- perang
> ideologi
> > > dan
> > > > > proyek misi "pemurtadan" .
> > > > >
> > > > > The Blair/Bush model is the opposite model. They also
> want
> > > to
> > > > do
> > > > > business with the Islamic world, but they also want to
> reform
> > > > the
> > > > > Islamic societies so that the relationships become more
> > > > rational and
> > > > > civilized. They oppose the idea of a fence (because either
> > > > > impractical or unfair or unnecessary). They oppose the
> idea
> > > of
> > > > > tolerating the various dictators of the Islamic world. Like
> > > Israel,
> > > > > they cannot use the Soviet or Chinese methods.
> Therefore
> > > they
> > > > came
> > > > > up with the ultimate missionary project: reform the
> Islamic
> > > > world
> > > > > according to the democratic values of the Christian world
> (a
> > > > > contradiction that is very clear to Osama and Zarqawi but
> still
> > > > > eludes Bush, Blair and all the "moderate" Muslims of the
> > > > world).
> > > > > Some would want to add the Indian model to the picture.
> After
> > > > all,
> > > > > India has more Muslims than any other country in the
> world
> > > > (Islamic
> > > > > or not). But India also has the highest number of victims
> to
> > > > > religious/ethnic clashes. So it is more an anarchic model
> > > > (where the
> > > > > government lets mobs fight each other) than a centralized
> > > > model.
> > > > > After the publication of cartoons that made fun of
> Mohammed
> > > > (the man
> > > > > whom Muslims consider a holy prophet and whose
> depiction
> > > > is, they
> > > > > think, forbidden), and the subsequent violent protests in
> > > many
> > > > parts
> > > > > of the Islamic world, there has been a huge backlash
> against
> > > > Islam
> > > > > in Europe. This was the proverbial last straw. Europeans
> had
> > > > already
> > > > > exhausted their patience with the endless list of Muslim
> > > > grievances.
> > > > > A Dutch filmmaker was killed for insulting Islam, and few
> > > > Muslims
> > > > > objected to that killing. Muslims blew up the Madrid
> station.
> > > > > Muslims sent death threats to anyone daring to speak
> > > against
> > > > Islam.
> > > > > Muslims rioted in the streets of French cities. Basically,
> every
> > > > > month some Muslims make the headlines in Europe for
> > > trying
> > > > to impose
> > > > > their will over the entire continent. The perception by
> many in
> > > > > Europe is that Europe is slowly becoming an Islamic
> > > > dictatorship, in
> > > > > which the will of a few local Muslims and, more
> importantly,
> > > the
> > > > > will of millions of Muslims who live outside Europe,
> decides
> > > > what
> > > > > Europeans can do, write and think.
> > > > >
> > > > > For millions of Europeans this is a paradox. It took
> centuries
> > > > for
> > > > > Europeans to get rid of the dictatorship of their own
> religion
> > > > > (Christianity, mainly represented by the Roman Church).
> > > Now
> > > > not only
> > > > > there is fear of a new religious dictatorship, but it is not
> even
> > > a
> > > > > European religion that tells Europeans to obey the
> Roman
> > > > dogma, it
> > > > > is someone else's religion that comes to Europe and
> tells
> > > > Europeans
> > > > > to obey the Meccan dogma.
> > > > >
> > > > > An undesired consequence of the cartoons riots is the
> > > sudden
> > > > > popularity of right-wing politicians. An Italian minister,
> who is
> > > a
> > > > > member of a right-wing party, proudly displayed on
> national
> > > > > television a shirt deemed offensive by Muslims. The
> Italian
> > > > prime
> > > > > minister Silvio Berlusconi asked the minister to resign.
> The
> > > > > minister resigned. (Incidentally, Libya later suspended
> the
> > > > interior
> > > > > minister who ordered the police to fire at the
> demonstrators
> > > > that
> > > > > were attacking the Italian consulate, in other words
> > > punishing
> > > > the
> > > > > minister who tried to stop the mob). The resignation of
> the
> > > > Italian
> > > > > minister is another gift to the right-wing parties of Europe:
> a
> > > > > minister was forced to resign because Muslims rioted
> > > against
> > > > a
> > > > > European country. Does that mean that, from now on,
> > > > European
> > > > > ministers will have to resign every time a Muslim mob,
> > > > somewhere in
> > > > > the world, riots against some European countries?
> > > > > (Not long ago, a Spanish prime minister lost an election
> > > > because
> > > > > Muslims blew up the Madrid rail station).
> > > > >
> > > > > European right-wing parties, from Holland to Denmark to
> > > > France to
> > > > > Italy, sense a historical opportunity. For decades they
> have
> > > > been
> > > > > viewed as nostalgic and senile people who long for the
> > > > grotesque
> > > > > parades of Mussolini and Petain. Suddenly, they can
> present
> > > > > themselves as the real defenders of European freedom
> and
> > > > (gasp)
> > > > > democracy. They are the only ones who stand up against
> the
> > > > Islamic
> > > > > dictatorship. Thus the continuining provocations by the
> > > > right-wing
> > > > > politicians. It is the old Sharon strategy: Sharon provoked
> the
> > > > > Palestinians into starting the intifada, so that the Israeli
> > > people
> > > > > would vote for the right-wing party and elect him, Sharon,
> > > prime
> > > > > minister. It worked in Israel. It may work in Europe too.
> More
> > > > and
> > > > > more European right-wing politicians are publicly
> offending
> > > > Islam in
> > > > > the attempt to obtain the trust of millions of European
> voters
> > > > who
> > > > > are getting more and more concerned about the growing
> > > > influence of
> > > > > Islam on their countries.
> > > > >
> > > > > Sharon and Bush are becoming ever more popular in
> > > Europe.
> > > > There are
> > > > > now millions of Europeans asking for the expulsion of
> > > Muslims
> > > > from
> > > > > Europe and for the creation of some sort of "fence" (not
> > > literally,
> > > > > of course) along the Mediterranean that would stop
> Muslim
> > > > > immigration to Italy. As an Italian viewer said on
> television, "If
> > > > > you like the Quran better than democracy, why don't you
> move
> > > > to
> > > > > Saudi Arabia instead of western Europe?"
> > > > > Europeans do not see Bush as a friend of the Muslims
> > > (which
> > > > he
> > > > > actually is). They see him as the Western leader who has
> > > > invaded two
> > > > > Islamic countries (Afghanistan and Iraq). And they see
> him
> > > as
> > > > a
> > > > > strong defender of western values, compared to the
> pathetic
> > > > wimps
> > > > > who rule France and Spain.
> > > > > (Ironically, most Muslims make the same mistake: they
> view
> > > > Chirac as
> > > > > a friend, and Bush as an enemy, when in fact it is Bush
> who
> > > > believes
> > > > > in the feasibility of reforms in the Islamic world, and
> Chirac is
> > > > > the one who believes it is pointless to try). At the same
> time the
> > > > > Anglosaxon citizens (USA, Britain,
> > > > Australia)
> > > > > have been moving closer to the original French view. The
> > > > public
> > > > > opinions of the USA, Britain and Australia are growing
> more
> > > > > disillusioned with the Islamic world. It seems like a lost
> > > cause:
> > > > > the Islamic world does not seem to be interested in
> cultural
> > > > > progress, democratic reforms, equality for women and so
> > > forth:
> > > > it
> > > > > seems to be interested only in the Quran. Why waste
> > > energies,
> > > > time,
> > > > > money and lives to export the western model of progress
> and
> > > > > democracy to one billion people who just do not care for
> it?
> > > > Bush de
> > > > > facto joined Chirac's "ignore" party when he (at last)
> called for
> > > > an
> > > > > end to the USA's addiction to oil.
> > > > > What is missing from this picture is the Islamic view of
> > > > coexistince
> > > > > with the rest of the world. It is difficult to tell what the
> > > > > majority (not the minority) of Muslims want. There are
> > > > indications
> > > > > that they are even more confused and afraid than
> Europeans.
> > > > Many
> > > > > Muslims in Europe know that they are being treated
> > > humanely
> > > > by a
> > > > > social system that is unparalleled in the rest of the world,
> > > and
> > > > > they don't want to lose what they have. Few Muslims of
> > > Europe
> > > > want
> > > > > to go back to their countries. But all of them feel that, for
> one
> > > > > reason or another, they are being increasingly
> discriminated,
> > > > > humiliated and abused. In a sense, they feel what the
> Jews
> > > felt
> > > > in
> > > > > the 1930s. And the anti-Islamic talk of the right-wing
> parties
> > > is
> > > > > not very different from the anti-Jewish talk of Adolf Hitler.
> > > > > It is also difficult to counter the anti-western propaganda of
> > > > >
> Al
> > > > > Jazeera, that does everything it can to inflame Muslims
> > > > worldwide.
> > > > > Al Jazeera is a factor that western countries keep
> > > > underestimating.
> > > > > It is responsible for much of the anti-western feeling in
> the
> > > > > Islamic world. It routinely emphasizes and blows out of
> > > > proportion
> > > > > anything that happens in the world that can be possibly
> > > > conceived as
> > > > > an attack against Islam. It rarely criticizes the tyrants of
> the
> > > > > Islamic world (and only on very minor issues) but it
> > > constantly
> > > > > criticizes everything that the USA, Europe, Russia, China
> and
> > > > India
> > > > > do. The Al Jazeera viewers see a world that "is" a conflict
> > > > between
> > > > > the rest of the world (aggressor) and Islam (victim), and
> react
> > > > by
> > > > > enacting that very conflict between Islam (aggressor) and
> the
> > > > rest
> > > > > of the world (victim). It is Al Jazeera that instills in the
> minds
> > > > > of millions of Muslims the idea that the whole Danish
> country
> > > > and
> > > > > actually the whole European population and actually the
> > > whole
> > > > > Christian world (not just one small newspaper) is guilty
> of
> > > > > offending Islam (not just of doing to Mohammed what
> has
> > > > been done
> > > > > for years to Jesus, Buddha and any other religious
> figure). It
> > > is
> > > > Al
> > > > > Jazeera that scientifically turns peaceful ordinary people
> into
> > > > > beings full of rage (and, statistically, some of them into
> > > suicide
> > > > > bombers).
> > > > > It is always surprising how hostile the emotion of an Al
> > > Jazeera
> > > > > viewer are at the beginning of a conversation, and how
> > > friendly
> > > > they
> > > > > become by the end of the conversation: Al Jazeera
> viewers
> > > > never hear
> > > > > the "other" version of the story.
> > > > > Muslims do not fully realize how dangerous this collision
> > > drive
> > > > is.
> > > > > When the entire non-Islamic world allied to fight the
> Taliban
> > > in
> > > > > Afghanistan, they basically rehearsed a scenario that had
> > > > never
> > > > > happened before: the USA, Europe, Russia, China and
> India
> > > > united in
> > > > > a war against a common enemy. Who was the common
> > > > enemy that managed
> > > > > to unite such antagonizing powers? Ultimately, it was
> Islam.
> > > > The
> > > > > Islamic world, brainwashed by Al Jazeera's hysterical
> > > > propaganda and
> > > > > by the chronic stupidity of the Arab leaders, does not
> realize
> > > > that
> > > > > something similar could happen on a larger scale.
> Trouble
> > > > from the
> > > > > Philippines to Bali to Thailand to western China, to
> > > > northwestern
> > > > > India to southern Russia to the cities of Paris could
> manage
> > > to
> > > > > unite the world powers against the Islamic world.
> > > > > Put it this way. Every time there is a lull in Islamic
> turbulence,
> > > > > the news shifts towards some disagreement between
> the
> > > USA
> > > > and China,
> > > > > the USA and Russia, the USA and Latin America, and
> even
> > > the
> > > > USA and
> > > > > Europe. Thus this is still a rather divided world, with
> several
> > > > > powers vying for regional and global power. Whenever
> > > > Muslims riot in
> > > > > some part of the world or carry out a terrorist attack, the
> news
> > > > > shifts dramatically: gone are the tensions between the
> > > world's
> > > > > superpower, and one ghost rises above all the others,
> the
> > > > ghost of
> > > > > Islam.
> > > > > The Islamic countries are not fully realizing how close
> they
> > > are
> > > > to
> > > > > the abyss.
> > > > > TM, ®, Copyright © 2005 Piero Scaruffi All rights reserved.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > __________ NOD32 1.1608 (20060619) Information
> > > __________
> > > >
> > > > This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.
> > > > http://www.eset.com
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~-->
Great things are happening at Yahoo! Groups. See the new email design.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/do.u8A/hOaOAA/Zx0JAA/uTGrlB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~->
Post message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
List owner : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Homepage : http://proletar.8m.com/
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/proletar/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
