***Israel’s costly presence ended with a humiliating unilateral withdrawal 
in 2000 because of regular Hezbollah attacks.

***Israel akan alami kekalahan yang sama di tahun 2006...

July 28, 2006  Friday

Lebanon: a graveyard for foreign troops

By Stuart Williams

BEIRUT: As world powers on Wednesday weighed a peacekeeping force for 
conflict-hit Lebanon, recent history shows that the region has often proved 
a graveyard or a quagmire for foreign troops.

Even before four UN peacekeepers were killed in an Israeli air-raid 
overnight, the international missions in Lebanon in the 1970s and 1980s were 
all marked by casualties or beset by problems.

The oldest deployment, and one that is still running, is the United Nations 
Truce Supervision Organisation (UNTSO).

Based in Jerusalem it comprises troops from more than 20 nations, and was 
deployed in 1948 to monitor a ceasefire between Israel and the Palestinians 
that brought their war of the time to a halt.

Other UN contingents have been drawn together in response to the hostilities 
that have erupted and evolved in the region, including the UN Interim Force 
in Lebanon (UNIFIL), which emerged in 1978.

Deployed to ensure that Israeli troops had withdrawn from Lebanon after 
confronting the Palestine Liberation Organisation (PLO), UNIFIL has lost 
some 300 peacekeepers, including four on Tuesday, according to Michael 
Moran, at the US Council on Foreign Relations.

The force’s mandate, renewed several times in its almost 30-year deployment, 
is to “restore international peace and security” and “assist the government 
of Lebanon in ensuring the return of its effective authority in the area.”

While the terms of a new “stabilisation force” which were being considered 
in Rome on Wednesday are unclear, these two aims have been frequently 
repeated by diplomats involved in the talks.

As world powers weigh the use of European Union or Nato troops, whose rules 
of engagement are generally far more robust, it is clear that US forces are 
unlikely to be involved.

Besides being tied up in conflicts in Afghanistan and Iraq, US forces also 
fell foul of violence in Beirut in 1983.

The year before, the area was a base for PLO leader Yasser Arafat and saw 
fighting between Muslim and Druze militias.

In one of the most notorious incidents, Israel’s proxy South Lebanon Army 
massacred some 800 people.

Israel moved in again, and after a year of hostilities finally withdrew when 
a peace agreement was reached.

The international community, in the form of US, French and Italian troops, 
moved in again to police it.

But the Shia group Hezbollah, which had sprung up during Iran’s Islamic 
Revolution in 1979, sparked chaos with a series of attacks, first killing 63 
people with a car bomb at the US embassy in Beirut.

Its most daring attack was six months later when one of its fighters drove 
an explosive-laden truck into the headquarters of US and French forces and 
smashed against the building.

The devastation left 300 US troops dead. The attack triggered withdrawal of 
US troops from Lebanon.

And as Lebanon descended into chaos, Israel moved in to erect a buffer zone 
some 30 kilometres wide on its northern border.

Israel’s costly presence ended with a humiliating unilateral withdrawal in 
2000 because of regular Hezbollah attacks.—AFP

http://www.dawn.com/2006/07/28/int6.htm




Post message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe   :  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe :  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
List owner  :  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Homepage    :  http://proletar.8m.com/ 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/proletar/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Kirim email ke