The Times August 05, 2006

Don't be fooled by the fanatics: Islam's liberals are on the march
Irshad Manji

Even Muslim clerics in Pakistan now hint that the Hudood laws are not 
divinely created


IT IS EASY to believe that the Muslim world has only bad news to offer. But 
easy doesn’t mean accurate; in truth, there’s much good news to report.

First, allow me to confess the obvious: we Muslims play the role of villain 
quite well, thanks. Last month, a group of terrorists — evidently Islamist 
militants — blew commuter trains to shards in India. The next day, Hezbollah 
kidnapped and killed Israeli soldiers, touching off the latest round of 
bombs and bullets.



But I expect the worst from religious extremists; moderate Muslims 
disappoint me more. We call for a “proportionate response” from Israel. Yet 
when we diminish or ignore Hezbollah’s crimes, we engage in a 
disproportionate response of our own. It has attacked Israel from southern 
Lebanon and Gaza, the very areas that the Jewish state had unilaterally 
evacuated. If Islam is another word for peace, what is unIslamic about 
opposing such bald aggression?

Moreover, Hezbollah deliberately endangers the lives of Muslim and Christian 
civilians. Its fighters set up shop in the middle of busy residential 
districts, so that any retaliation against them must involve hitting 
innocents. What makes Muslims moderate when we wink at this cruel calculus?

So given our hostility-turned-hypocrisy, how can I say there is good news? 
Brace yourselves: during the week that India and Israel were reminded of 
Islamist brutality, liberal Muslims made progress in reclaiming our faith, 
both in the East and in the West.

Let’s start in the East. For almost three decades, Pakistan has followed a 
set of laws called Hudood, after hudd or penalties prescribed by God, that 
determine punishment in cases of rape and adultery. Under these laws, more 
than 4,600 Pakistani women have been thrown in prison for offences that 
include adultery. By contrast, virtually all men accused of rape go free.

The Hudood ordinances are being seriously challenged at last. Thanks to a 
vocal, but religiously respectful, campaign by civil society groups, the 
influential Council for Islamic Ideology recently recommended reform. That 
move allowed President Musharraf to begin releasing some of the 1,300 women 
who were in jail awaiting trial.

Even Muslim clerics in Pakistan now hint that the Hudood laws are not 
divinely created. The politics behind them tells us so. In 1977, a US-backed 
coup installed General Zia al-Haq as president. To cement his grip, the 
strongman surrounded himself with sycophantic mullahs who referred to him as 
“Commander of the Faithful”, a term reserved for the successors of Prophet 
Muhammad. To curry favour among village leaders, Zia mixed a selective 
reading of the Koran with tribal customs. Stoning became a legal punishment 
for adultery, while a rape had to be witnessed by four men before an 
offender could be charged.But suppose a rape doesn’t have the benefit of so 
many male eyes or male voices willing to testify? Then the woman involved 
would be accused of adultery and she could be jailed, lashed or stoned. The 
injustices that followed have slandered not only women, but Islam itself.

As more and more Muslims in Pakistan recognise that these laws emanate from 
human beings, they acknowledge that the duty to rethink them also rests in 
their hands, not God’s. Muslims believe that Allah is perfect. We are 
learning to appreciate that Allah’s interpreters are not.

The liberal reformation of Islam picked up more speed in Denmark, the 
country that sparked worldwide riots after one of its newspapers published 
cartoons depicting the Prophet Muhammad. In Copenhagen I joined other 
“Muslim Leaders of Tomorrow” to debate how Islam and the West can enrich 
each other. Allow me to divulge some of their more shocking statements:


Man from the Netherlands: “We, as Muslims, need to look in the mirror 
instead of blaming everybody else!”

Woman from Germany: “I don’t have an identity crisis. I’m Western and Muslim 
and grateful to be both.”


Imam from Britain: “The minute a woman becomes a mufti [Islamic judge], I 
will be the first to study at her feet.”

One delegate tested the young clerics by asking: “Is Islam the only way to 
salvation?” A Danish imam gripped the microphone: “The short answer,” he 
said, “is no.” A British imam disputed that response and an Italian took the 
middle road. Remarkably, they never accused each other of being evil or 
insincere. For the first time in my life, I heard the message that in Islam, 
unity does not have to mean uniformity.

The conference organisers were emboldened to do something utterly 
unthinkable: welcome Flemming Rose, the editor of Jyllands-Posten and 
publisher of the reviled cartoons. Rose confided that the reception we gave 
him was more civil than anything he had experienced from secular groups.

A liberal reformation of Islam will involve at least two features: the 
empowerment of women in the Islamic world, and the willingness of Muslims in 
the West to exercise their freedom of conscience. In one week, both got a 
promising boost. We will need to remember that as God’s soldiers continue to 
grab the spotlight.


Irshad Manji is author of The Trouble with Islam Today: A Wake-Up Call for 
Honesty and Change

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,6-2299560,00.html




Post message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe   :  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe :  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
List owner  :  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Homepage    :  http://proletar.8m.com/ 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/proletar/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



Kirim email ke