God or no God, is there an afterlife?
MUKUL SHARMA

TIMES NEWS NETWORK[ FRIDAY, AUGUST 11, 2006 12:00:00 AM]

It’s funny how belief in an afterlife is inexorably linked with religion and 
ultimately God. It’s also linked with some sort of cause and effect event, 
in the sense that such an afterlife is usually seen as a consequence of the 
kind of life led while living so that either reckoning or reward can take 
place.

Thus the argument axiomatically presupposes a reckoner or reward giver — 
i.e., a judgmental creator. But why should this be?

For one thing it takes for granted that such a being is primarily interested 
in forever testing its creation in one little neck of the cosmos, as if 
something that could bring into being the entirety of creation couldn’t have 
other things to do.

Thus if we take a leaf out of deism, which is the belief that God may have 
created the universe but thereafter does not intervene in its functioning 
for the simple reason that it’s the best of all possible worlds and does not 
require intervention, we can get a different handle on afterlife.

Mainly, that there isn’t one because there’s no need for it as no one’s 
doling out any kind of decisions. True, this means the moral life gets a 
kick upstairs but it also brings into sharp focus that the moral life was 
only being propagated or lived due to fear (or love) of consequences. 
Surely, morality should have a firmer basis for existing — if it does at 
all.

But now watch what happens on the other hand. Unbelievers take it for 
granted that all they have to do is disbelieve everything believers believe 
in to get an ism going.

Therefore, their case automatically becomes one where if there’s no first 
cause, prime mover, divine essence or whatever then “obviously” there can be 
no afterlife. After all, what possible purpose would it serve? This is the 
only life, directed by blind evolution and discontinued by death.

However, such an argument can also be viewed as blindly pre-emptive. First 
of all, are all the facts in as far as rationality is concerned? Of course 
not. They weren’t in 2000 years ago when Aristotle thought he had the world 
curled up in his fist and they aren’t in today with quantum mechanics 
predicting up to 11 additional dimensions curled up inside our 3-D world.

How extra mind-boggling is that really from accepting reincarnation for 
which there is a fair bit of suggestive evidence too? Two thousand years 
from now it may become overwhelming enough to be casually accepted without 
any reference to God.


http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/articleshow/1882746.cms




Post message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe   :  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe :  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
List owner  :  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Homepage    :  http://proletar.8m.com/ 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/proletar/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



Kirim email ke