Nggak bisa bantah apa yang dibilang Puin tahun 2001..

--- In [email protected], "hadingrh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> hehehe .. scientist plinplan dong
> 
> 
> 
> Robert Hoyland : 
> the historical memory of the Muslim community is more robust than some
> have claimed.
> John Burton:
> What we have today in our hands is the Mushaf of Muhammad.
> 
> --- In [email protected], "hadjar_wish" <hadjar@> wrote:
> >
> > 
> > 
> > --- In [email protected], "hadingrh" <hadingrh@> wrote:
> > >
> > > ucapan puin yang paling mutakhir adalah yang ini :
> > 
> > Omongan Puin yang muttakhir?
> > 
> > Interpiunya di Le Monde diterbitkan akhir tahun 2001 dan dia belum
> > mencabut omongannnya itu..  
> > 
> > 
> > > "The important thing, thank God, is that these Yemeni Qur'anic
> > > fragments do not differ from those found in museums and libraries
> > > elsewhere, with the exception of details that do not touch the
Qur'an
> > > itself, but are rather differences in the way words are spelled.
This
> > > phenomenon is well-known, even in the Qur'an published in Cairo in
> > > which is written:
> > > Ibrhim next to Ibrhm, Quran next to Qrn, Simahum next to Simhum
> > >
> > 
> > 
> > Tidak ada bukti bahwa al-Mushaf yang di Istambul dan tempat lain
> > manapun memang usmaniyah..
> > 
> > "attributed" "ascribed"... 
> > 
> > Tidak terbukti.
> > 
> >  
> > > 
> > > dan mungkin jusfiq tidak pernah mengutip koleksi copy lain, yg
> > > sebenarnya lebih tua dari yg ditemukan di sanaa ..
> > > yaitu :
> > >  A copy attributed to Caliph `Uthman bin `Affan, Amanat Khizana,
> > > Topkapi Saray, Instanbul, no. 1;
> > > - Another copy attributed to Caliph `Uthman, Amanat Khizana, Topkapi
> > > Saray, no. 208. This cope has some 300 folios and is missing a
portion
> > > from each end;
> > > - Another ascribed to `Uthman at Amanat Khizana, Topkapi Saray, no.
> > > 10. (83 folios and contains notes naming the scribe)
> > > - Another attributed to `Uthman at the Museum of Islamic Art,
> > > Istanbul. This is dated to the second half of the first century;
> > > - Attribute to Caliph `Uthman, 353 folios;
> > > - A large copy with 1000 pages, written between 25-31 AH at Rawaq
> > > al-Maghariba, al-Azhar, Cairo;
> > > - Another attributed to `Uthman, The Egyption Library, Cairo;
> > > - Mushaf ascribed to Caliph `Ali, Muzesi Kutuphanesi, Topkapi Saray,
> > > no. 36E.H.29 (147 folios);
> > > - Another two ascribed to `Ali, Amanat Khizana, Topkapi Saray,
no. 33
> > > (48 folios) and no. 25E.H.2 (414 folios);
> > > - Ascribed to Caliph `Ali, Raza Library, Rampur, India, No. 1 (343
> > > folios);
> > > - Ascribed to Caliph `Ali, Sana, Yemen;
> > > - Ascribed to Caliph `Ali, al-Mashhad al-Husaini, Cairo;
> > > - Ascribed to Caliph `Ali, Najaf, Iraq (if it hasn't been bombed by
> > > the US by now);
> > > - Ascribed to Hussain b. `Ali (d. 50AH), Mashhad, Iran;
> > > - Ascribed to Hasan b. `Ali, Mashhad, Iran, no. 12;
> > > - Ascribed to Hasan b. Ali, Najaf, Iraq;
> > > - A copy, most likely from the early first half of the first
century,
> > > in the Egyption Library, Cairo, no. 139 Masahif;
> > > - Ascribed to Khudaij b. Mu`awiya written in 49 AH, Amanat Khizana,
> > > Topkapi Saray, no. 44;
> > > - A mushaf in Kufic script penned in 74AH, Amanat Khizana, Topkapi
> > > Saray, no. 2 (406 folios);
> > > - A copy scribed by al-Hasan al-Basri in 77AH, the Egyption Library,
> > > Cairo, no 50 Masahif;
> > > Also, the Bibliotheque Nationale de France has some 5000 folios from
> > > different manuscripts....
> > > 
> > > 
> > > dokumen2 diatas much greater significance dibanding temuan di
> sanaa ...
> > > 
> > > John Burton:
> > > What we have today in our hands is the Mushaf of Muhammad.
> > > 
> > > --- In [email protected], "hadjar_wish" <hadjar@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/proletar/message/195320
> > > > 
> > > > Saya kutip kembali:
> > > > 
> > > > "His examination revealed unconventional verse orderings, textual
> > > > variations, and rare styles of orthography which diverges from the
> > > > authorised later version, refuting the assertion that the
Qu'ran is
> > > > the pure unadulterated word of God. The scriptures were written
> in the
> > > > early Hijazi Arabic script, matching the pieces of the earliest
> > > > Qur'ans known to exist. There were also versions very clearly
> written
> > > > over even earlier, faded versions. What the Yemeni Qu'rans
indicated
> > > > was an evolving text rather than a text fixed since the death
of the
> > > > Islamic prophet Muhammad in 632 CE."
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > --- In [email protected], "hadingrh" <hadingrh@> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > hehehe ... apa kamu ngerti apa yg kamu masalahkan ?
> > > > > bukan cuman makna, tapi ayatnya tidak berubah ... hanya cara
> > penulisan
> > > > > 
> > > > > apa kamu menuntut agar pada waktu itu sudah ada eyd (ejaan yg
> > > > > disempurnakan) ?
> > > > > mungkin kamu tertarik jg mempermasalahkan 'entot tjahyadi'
dengan
> > > > > 'entot cahyadi' sbg orang yg berbeda ? ..
> > > > > 
> > > > > --- In [email protected], "hadjar_wish" <hadjar@> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Jadi, Allah fiktif yang digambarkan dungu, buas, kejam,
> ganas dan
> > > > > > biadab oleh al-Mushaf itu tidak bisa - tentu saja - memenuhi
> > > janjinya
> > > > > > untuk menjaga am-Musahf itu.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > --- In [email protected], "hadingrh" <hadingrh@> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > sebuah gaya tulisan atau spelling means nothing karena tidak
> > > merubah
> > > > > > > makna samasekali
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "hadjar_wish" <hadjar@>
> wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Omongan Puin ini jelas bilang: ada bedanya.
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > Dan omongan ini diperjelas dari kutipan yang lain..
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "hadingrh" <hadingrh@>
> wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > bang puin bilang:
> > > > > > > > > "The important thing, thank God, is that these Yemeni
> > Qur'anic
> > > > > > > > > fragments do not differ from those found in museums and
> > > > libraries
> > > > > > > > > elsewhere, with the exception of details that do not
> > touch the
> > > > > > Qur'an
> > > > > > > > > itself, but are rather differences in the way words are
> > > spelled.
> > > > > > This
> > > > > > > > > phenomenon is well-known, even in the Qur'an
published in
> > > > Cairo in
> > > > > > > > > which is written:
> > > > > > > > > Ibrhim next to Ibrhm, Quran next to Qrn, Simahum next to
> > > Simhum
> > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > John Burton:
> > > > > > > > > What we have today in our hands is the Mushaf of
Muhammad.
> > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > jadi kesimpulannya, quran itu sudah solid.. tidak
> > terbantahkan
> > > > > bahwa
> > > > > > > > > itu benar2 kalam Ilahi..
> > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > jadi tidak ada ruang lagi untuk memperebatkan lagi
> > > > keotentikan al
> > > > > > > > quran..
> > > > > > > > > bahwa quran jaman onta sama dengan jaman dimana orang
> dungu
> > > > > > sudah bisa
> > > > > > > > > ngepost email di kampung petar ...
> > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > berikut komentar dari para ilmuwan lainnya:
> > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > Dr. Moore
> > > > > > > > > Dr. Moore was a former President of the Canadian
> > > Association of
> > > > > > > > > Anatomists, and of the American Association of Clinical
> > > > > > Anatomists. He
> > > > > > > > > was honoured by the Canadian Association of Anatomists
> > > with the
> > > > > > > > > prestigious J.C.B. Grant Award and in 1994 he
received the
> > > > > Honoured
> > > > > > > > > Member Award of the American Association of Clinical
> > > Anatomists
> > > > > >  "for
> > > > > > > > > outstanding contributions to the field of clinical
> anatomy."
> > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > "For the past three years, I have worked with the
> Embryology
> > > > > > Committee
> > > > > > > > > of King cAbdulaziz University in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia,
> > helping
> > > > > > them to
> > > > > > > > > interpret the many statements in the Qur'an and Sunnah
> > > > > referring to
> > > > > > > > > human reproduction and prenatal development. At first
> I was
> > > > > > astonished
> > > > > > > > > by the accuracy of the statements that were recorded in
> > > the 7th
> > > > > > > > > century AD, before the science of embryology was
> > established.
> > > > > > Although
> > > > > > > > > I was aware of the glorious history of Muslim
> scientists in
> > > > > the 10th
> > > > > > > > > century AD, and some of their contributions to
Medicine, I
> > > knew
> > > > > > > > > nothing about the religious facts and beliefs contained
> > in the
> > > > > > Qur'an
> > > > > > > > > and Sunnah."[2]
> > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > At a conference in Cairo he presented a research
paper and
> > > > stated:
> > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > "It has been a great pleasure for me to help clarify
> > > statements
> > > > > > in the
> > > > > > > > > Qur'an about human development. It is clear to me that
> these
> > > > > > > > > statements must have come to Muhammad from God, or
Allah,
> > > > > > because most
> > > > > > > > > of this knowledge was not discovered until many
centuries
> > > later.
> > > > > > This
> > > > > > > > > proves to me that Muhammad must have been a messenger of
> > > God, or
> > > > > > > > > Allah." [1]
> > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > Professor Moore also stated that:
> > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > "...Because the staging of human embryos is complex,
owing
> > > > to the
> > > > > > > > > continuous process of change during development, it is
> > > proposed
> > > > > > that a
> > > > > > > > > new system of classification could be developed
using the
> > > terms
> > > > > > > > > mentioned in the Qur'an and Sunnah. The proposed
system is
> > > > simple,
> > > > > > > > > comprehensive, and conforms with present embryological
> > > > knowledge.
> > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > "The intensive studies of the Qur'an and Hadith in the
> > > last four
> > > > > > years
> > > > > > > > > have revealed a system of classifying human embryos
> that is
> > > > > amazing
> > > > > > > > > since it was recorded in the seventh century A.D... the
> > > > > descriptions
> > > > > > > > > in the Qur'an cannot be based on scientific knowledge
> in the
> > > > > seventh
> > > > > > > > > century..."[1]
> > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > E. Marshall Johnson  
> > > > > > > > > Professor and Chairman of the Department of Anatomy and
> > > > > > Developmental
> > > > > > > > > Biology, and Director of the Daniel Baugh Institute,
> Thomas
> > > > > > Jefferson
> > > > > > > > > University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
> > > > > > > > > Author of over 200 publications. Former President of the
> > > > > Teratology
> > > > > > > > > Society among other accomplishments. Professor Johnson
> began
> > > > > to take
> > > > > > > > > an interest in the scientific signs in the Qur'an at
> the 7th
> > > > Saudi
> > > > > > > > > Medical Conference (1982), when a special committee was
> > > > formed to
> > > > > > > > > investigate scientific signs in the Qur'an and
Hadith. At
> > > first,
> > > > > > > > > Professor Johnson refused to accept the existence of
such
> > > > > verses in
> > > > > > > > > the Qur'an and Hadith. But after a dicussuion with
Sheikh
> > > > > Zindani he
> > > > > > > > > took an interest and concentrated his research on the
> > internal
> > > > > > as well
> > > > > > > > > as external development of the fetus.
> > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > "...in summary, the Qur'an describes not only the
> > > development of
> > > > > > > > > external form, but emphasises also the internal
> stages, the
> > > > stages
> > > > > > > > > inside the embryo, of its creation and development,
> > > emphasising
> > > > > > major
> > > > > > > > > events recognised by contemporary science."
> > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > "As a scientist, I can only deal with things which I can
> > > > > > specifically
> > > > > > > > > see. I can understand embryology and developmental
> biology.
> > > > I can
> > > > > > > > > understand the words that are translated to me from the
> > > > > Qur'an. As I
> > > > > > > > > gave the example before, if I were to transpose myself
> > > into that
> > > > > > era,
> > > > > > > > > knowing what I do today and describing things, I
could not
> > > > > describe
> > > > > > > > > the things that were described...
> > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > I see no evidence to refute the concept that this
> individual
> > > > > > Muhammad
> > > > > > > > > had to be developing this information from some
> place... so
> > > > I see
> > > > > > > > > nothing here in conflict with the concept that divine
> > > > > > intervention was
> > > > > > > > > involved in what he was able to write..." 
> > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > Joe Leigh Simpson
> > > > > > > > > He is the President of the American Fertility Society.
> > He has
> > > > > > received
> > > > > > > > > many awards, including the Association of Professors of
> > > > > > Obstetrics and
> > > > > > > > > Gynaecology Public Recognition Award in 1992. Like many
> > > others,
> > > > > > > > > Professor Simpson was taken by surprise when he
discovered
> > > > > that the
> > > > > > > > > Qur'an and Hadith contain verses related to his
> specialised
> > > > > field of
> > > > > > > > > study. When he met with Sheikh Abdul-Majeed
A.Zindani, he
> > > > > > insisted on
> > > > > > > > > verifying the text presented to him from the Qur'an and
> > > Hadith.
> > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > "... these Hadiths (sayings of Muhammad) could not
> have been
> > > > > > obtained
> > > > > > > > > on the basis of the scientific knowledge that was
> available
> > > > at the
> > > > > > > > > time of the 'writer'... It follows that not only is
> there no
> > > > > > conflict
> > > > > > > > > between genetics and religion (Islam) but in fact
religion
> > > > > > (Islam) may
> > > > > > > > > guide science by adding revelation to some of the
> > traditional
> > > > > > > > > scientific approaches... There exist statements in the
> > Qur'an
> > > > > shown
> > > > > > > > > centuries later to be valid which support knowledge
in the
> > > > Qur'an
> > > > > > > > > having been derived from God."
> > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > Gerald C. Goeringer
> > > > > > > > > Sheikh  cAbdul-Majeed A.Zindani met with Professor
> > > Goeringer and
> > > > > > asked
> > > > > > > > > him whether in the history of embryology was there any
> > mention
> > > > > > of the
> > > > > > > > > different stages of embryonic development, or whether
> there
> > > > > existed
> > > > > > > > > any embryological texts at the time of the Prophet.
Sheikh
> > > > Zindani
> > > > > > > > > also asked his opinion regarding the terms the Qur'an
> > uses to
> > > > > > describe
> > > > > > > > > the different phases of fetal development. After several
> > long
> > > > > > > > > discussions, he presented a study at the 8th Saudi
Medical
> > > > > > Conference:
> > > > > > > > > "...In a relatively few ayahs (Qur'anic verses) is
> > contained a
> > > > > > rather
> > > > > > > > > comprehensive description of human development from the
> > > time of
> > > > > > > > > commingling of the gametes through organogenesis. No
such
> > > > > > distinct and
> > > > > > > > > complete record of human development such as
> classification,
> > > > > > > > > terminology, and description existed previously. In
> most, if
> > > > > not all
> > > > > > > > > instances, this description antedates by many
> centuries the
> > > > > > recording
> > > > > > > > > of the various stages of human embryonic and fetal
> > development
> > > > > > > > > recorded in the traditional scientific literature."
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>




Post message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe   :  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe :  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
List owner  :  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Homepage    :  http://proletar.8m.com/ 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/proletar/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/proletar/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 

Kirim email ke