Sunday, December 16, 2007
  DURIAN 
By Amina Rasul

Islam and democracy in Southeast Asia 

>From Dec. 10 to 12, 44 sisters and brothers from Singapore, 
Malaysia, Thailand and Indonesia gathered at the historic Manila 
Hotel for the First South East Asian Forum on Islam and Democracy. 
This regional conference is the product of four previous roundtable 
discussions   in the Philippines, Malaysia, Indonesia and Thailand.  
The group represented a wide range of civil society organizations 
and leaders, many representing religious and political 
organizations. 

The four previous roundtables were designed to give a platform to 
progressive Muslim voices for democracy, pluralism and tolerance in 
Southeast Asia.  We hoped that we could build unity of purpose and 
strategies within the forces of reform and change, identify 
progressive actions and programs that advance democracy, pluralism 
and tolerance among Muslims in our countries and in the region. 

We hoped that this conference would pave the way for the creation of 
a major regional organization, the South East Asian Forum on Islam 
and Democracy (SEAFID), promoting democratic efforts and allowing 
democracy and reform advocates to learn from each other's 
experiences, hurdle our differences and harness what unites us as we 
work for our communities. During this 1st SEAFID, we had a two-point 
agenda:  consensus on whether we could have a regional network and 
the priority areas we could work on together. We hoped; we did not 
expect.  To everyone's surprise and delight, not only did we attain 
consensus on the two points, we actually agreed on a draft charter, 
subject to further refinements as we did not have time to go into 
the important details. 

Many believe that Islam and democracy are incompatible.  The 
youngest participant in our conference, 18-year-old Rashad Ali from 
Malaysia, said that the first SEAFID showed that democracy is alive 
in our Muslim communities.  He was referring to the debates we had 
and the consensus we achieved after heated discussions. 

Proud as we all were of what we accomplished in two short days, we 
also realized that the task is not done: it has just started.  We 
already have plans to convene the small charter drafting committee 
very soon so that we could thresh out the problem areas and 
incorporate the suggestions made by majority.  The final charter 
might be agreed upon during SEAFID 2, perhaps in Jakarta next year.  

During our first roundtable on Islam and Democracy in Manila in 
Sept. 2005, our keynote speaker was incoming ASEAN Secretary General 
Surin Pitsuwan.  He noted that Muslims in southeast Asia must make 
the choice to live in an open and democratic society and make their 
own choices. He observed that while Southeast Asia is generally 
moderate, tolerant, and inclusive, and continues to enjoy economic 
growth and relative political stability, peace, and security for the 
past three decades, this prosperity and growth has been uneven as it 
benefited some, while it marginalized others. (In Thailand and in 
the Philippines, the Muslim communities are the most marginalized.) 

This is where democratization becomes essential.  Dr. Pitsuwan, a 
member of the Thai Parliament, also warned that competition in an 
open society be rules-based, and that all players must follow these 
rules (especially governments?).  

Former President Fidel V. Ramos was our keynote speaker for 
SEAFID1.  He picked up the thread which Dr. Pitsuwan spun two years 
ago.  FVR spoke of the "Age of Democracy" that has engulfed 
practically all nations.  He observed that, "From authoritarian 
dictatorship, democracy is now at least the nominal pattern of 
governance in most parts of Southeast Asia."  He cautioned, 
however: "The 2006 military coup in Thailand and the continuing 
repressive rule of the generals in Myanmar remind us how fragile 
democracies in our region can be."  His main point was this:  
economic progress, political stability and their sustaina­bility is 
dependent on the consistency of democratic governance.  (I wondered 
if this was a message for the Philippines.) 

FVR, Surin Pitsuwan and all of us at SEAFID 1 are in agreement:  As 
our governments try to speed up our integration into a globalizing, 
rapidly modernizing world, we - the peoples who should be 
represented by governments - must address the democracy deficits in 
our region if we are to survive, not to mention competitive.  We, 
Muslim stakeholders in the Philippines and in the region, need to 
bring our voices together in a powerful chorus lest our governments 
forget that they represent us and move in a direction that will, in 
the end, put our communities in peril. 

One of our vocal participants quoted theologian Niebuhr in response 
to the question about the compatibility of the need for 
democracy: "Man's capacity for justice makes democracy possible, but 
man's inclination to injustice makes democracy necessary."  Amen, 
brother Khaleed.   
 
http://www.manilatimes.net/national/2007/dec/16/yehey/opinion/2007121
6opi4.html



Post message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe   :  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe :  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
List owner  :  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Homepage    :  http://proletar.8m.com/ 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/proletar/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/proletar/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 

Kirim email ke