Ah, bila ada moratorium hukuman mati diseluruh planet,
maka sedikit kemajuan akan tercapai.

  

---


Life over death
Emma Bonino

December 17, 2007 7:00 AM

http://commentisfree.guardian.co.uk/emma_bonino/2007/12/life_over_death.html

It is finally happening. After 13 years of
negotiations, delays, and hesitation, the UN general
assembly will vote this month on the proposal for a
universal moratorium on the death penalty. A large
majority of the UN adopted the proposal on November
15, despite attempts by some member states to
obstruct, amend, or bury it. Fortunately, in the end,
the opponents were forced to fight a will stronger
than their own: the will of those who - after the
abolition of slavery and torture - want to mark
another turning point for civilisation.

But will this December's vote be a mere formality?
Experience teaches us to be prudent. I have not opened
my bottle of spumante yet.

To be honest, I am not sure that all of the world's
governments have accepted the inevitable, or that even
the most inflexible will now agree to the moratorium.
But I continue to have faith that the general assembly
will know how to meet this challenge.

We are all aware that even if the vote succeeds, the
UN resolution will not be binding, and that
establishing and enforcing a moratorium is only a
necessary mid-way step towards full abolition. The UN
should push for an immediate de facto suspension,
without waiting for the debates to begin on legal
reforms in the respective countries. I hope that this
approach will allow a wide consensus in the general
assembly, and that any last minute change of heart
will fail.

One big lesson I learned during the struggle to create
the international criminal court (ICC), and now during
the battle for a moratorium on the death penalty, is
that it is often better to aim for a realistic result
rather than a perfect one. Before the international
community established the ICC, there were two ad hoc
tribunals - one for the former Yugoslavia and one for
Rwanda. Their work paved the way for the ICC.

Some European Union countries wanted to push for
complete abolition of the death penalty right away. I
understand their position. I would have wanted the
same thing myself. But had we followed that route, we
would most likely have failed.

There is an important lesson in this for the EU at a
time when it is seeking to become a global actor: we
must reach an internal consensus while always bearing
in mind what the external ramifications of our
decision might be. On the moratorium, we remained
pragmatic and built a strong European foreign policy.
And it was an advantage in the UN negotiations to have
a common European position and to have spoken with a
single voice.

A second lesson that I learned is also useful for the
EU, which finds itself in a world in which new powers
are emerging and where all actors from Manila to
Algiers, from Doha to Libreville, must deal with the
challenges of globalisation and interdependence on a
daily basis. That lesson is that Europe has more
friends than it has enemies in the world.

These friends deserve respect and attention. If Italy
and the EU had not understood the need to work with
non-European countries, and make them feel that they
were responsible and fully-fledged protagonists, the
efforts to establish the ICC and be so close to
declare a universal moratorium on the death penalty
would have failed.

I know that this is not exactly a new lesson, but it
is what I have in mind when I think of efficient
multilateralism. Not only does it work, but, above
all, in some cases, it is the only way of moving
forward.

Finally, a third lesson - relevant to the fight
against the death penalty and, indeed, to winning any
political battle - is perseverance, which I consider
to be a mix of pig-headedness and the ability to
maintain one's position. Without perseverance, there
can be no progress.

All this is a success, not only for anti-death penalty
radicals, for the Hands off Cain association, the
Italian government, and for the European Union and its
friends in the world. It is much more: it is a success
for all those who believe that it is still possible to
improve our world - and ultimately the human condition
- every day.


In cooperation with Project Syndicate/European Council
on Foreign Relations, 2007.

---------------
Jusfiq Hadjar gelar Sutan Maradjo Lelo

Allah yang disembah orang Islam tipikal dan yang digambarkan oleh al-Mushaf itu 
dungu, buas, kejam, keji, ganas, zalim lagi biadab hanyalah Allah fiktif.


      ___________________________________________________________
Yahoo! Answers - Got a question? Someone out there knows the answer. Try it
now.
http://uk.answers.yahoo.com/ 



Post message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe   :  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe :  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
List owner  :  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Homepage    :  http://proletar.8m.com/ 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/proletar/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/proletar/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 

Kirim email ke