Saya kutip bahagian tulisan saya dan HHS tentang
ilegalitas perang Iraq...
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/apakabar/message/96384
---
Jusfiq Hadjar (account allah.berfirman):
PS. Perang Iraq adalah ilegal, seperti yang dikatakan
oleh Sekretaris Jendral PBB ketika itu Kofi Annand.
HHS: The same Kofi Annand that bore corruption
citation from "UN Oil for food
program" for Iraqi people. True, the has been cleared
from any citation by the
panel (his colleagues). That his son who does the
cheating toward hungry and
depressed Iraqi people. But hey, its typical of an
iceberg phenomena. Aren't we
have the same parody here in Indonesia?
Give me an immaculate and pristine example, so I could
contemplate that
righteous example of yours may outshine my acts.
Isn't it says, that he who are without a sin can cast
the first stone?
Now, lead the way sir!! Show me the money!!
> Tidak ada alasan legal untuk menyerang Iraq, dasar
perang itu hanyalah kibulan
dan dusta.
HHS: .......Says the people who knowest NOT about it.
Komentar saya:
Pertama.
Membawa-bawa urusan anak Kofi Annan ke diskusi yang
mengenai ucapan Kofi Annan tentang perang Iraq adalah
salah satu puncak kenistaan cara diskusi HH Samosir
yang adalah monster pemebunuh manusia yang tangannya
bergelimang darah manusuia ini.
Walaupun tidak perlu, dan sekedar untuk memenuhi
permintaannya yang dungu, absurd dan nista itu saya
sertakan juga bersama ini pendapat Hans Blix.
Jadi: perang Iraq itu adalah ilegal.
Kedua:
Akan halnya dusta dan kibulan yang dijadikan alasan
perang Iraq oleh Bush, saya rasa kita tidak perlu
kembali ke Hans Blix: sampai sekarang tidak ada
senjata pemusnah masaal yang ditemukan di iraq.
HH Samosir tidak akam mengakui semua ini.
Monster dungu lagi biadab yang tangannya bergelimang
darah manausai jelas tidak akan mau melihaht
kenyataan: TIDAK ada bukti bahwa Iraq punya senjata
pemusnah massal yang dijadilan alasan untuk menyerang
Iraq - yang nota bene bukan casus belli.
---------
Published on Friday, March 5, 2004 by the
lndependent/UK
Blix: Iraq War Was Illegal
Blair's defense is bogus, says the former UN weapons
inspector
by Anne Penketh in Stockholm and Andrew Grice
The former chief UN weapons inspector Hans Blix has
declared that the war in Iraq was illegal, dealing
another devastating blow to Tony Blair.
Mr Blix, speaking to The Independent, said the
Attorney General's legal advice to the Government on
the eve of war, giving cover for military action by
the US and Britain, had no lawful justification. He
said it would have required a second United Nations
resolution explicitly authorizing the use of force for
the invasion of Iraq last March to have been legal.
His intervention goes to the heart of the current
controversy over Lord Goldsmith's advice, and comes as
the Prime Minister begins his fightback with a speech
on Iraq today.
An unrepentant Mr Blair will refuse to apologize for
the war in Iraq, insisting the world is a better place
without Saddam Hussein in power. He will point to the
wider benefits of the Iraq conflict, citing Libya's
decision to give up its weapons of mass destruction,
but warn that the world cannot turn a blind eye to the
continuing threat from WMD.
But, in an exclusive interview, Mr Blix said: "I don't
buy the argument the war was legalized by the Iraqi
violation of earlier resolutions."
And it appeared yesterday that the Government shared
that view until the eve of war, when it received the
Lord Goldsmith's final advice.
Sir Andrew Turnbull, the Cabinet Secretary, revealed
that the Government had assumed, until the eve of war
in Iraq, that it needed a specific UN mandate to
authorize military action.
Mr Blix demolished the argument advanced by Lord
Goldsmith three days before the war began, which
stated that resolution 1441 authorized the use of
force because it revived earlier UN resolutions passed
after the 1991 ceasefire.
Mr Blix said that while it was possible to argue that
Iraq had breached the ceasefire by violating UN
resolutions adopted since 1991, the "ownership" of the
resolutions rested with the entire 15-member Security
Council and not with individual states. "It's the
Security Council that is party to the ceasefire, not
the UK and US individually, and therefore it is the
council that has ownership of the ceasefire, in my
interpretation."
He said to challenge that interpretation would set a
dangerous precedent. "Any individual member could take
a view - the Russians could take one view, the Chinese
could take another, they could be at war with each
other, theoretically," Mr Blix said.
The Attorney General's opinion has come under fresh
scrutiny since the collapse of the trial against the
GCHQ whistleblower Katharine Gun last week, prompting
calls for his full advice to be made public.
Mr Blix, who is an international lawyer by training,
said: "I would suspect there is a more skeptical view
than those two A4 pages," in a reference to Clare
Short's contemptuous description of the 358-word
summary.
It emerged on Wednesday that a Foreign Office memo,
sent to the Foreign Affairs Select Committee on the
same day that Lord Goldsmith's summary was published,
made clear that there was no "automaticity" in
resolution 1441 to justify war.
Asked whether, in his view, a second resolution
authorizing force should have been adopted, Mr Blix
replied: "Oh yes."
In the interview, ahead of the publication next week
of his book Disarming Iraq: The search for weapons of
mass destruction, Mr Blix dismissed the suggestion
that Mr Blair should resign or apologize over the
failure to find any WMD in Iraq.
But he suggested that the Prime Minister may have been
fatally wounded by his loss of credibility, and that
voters would deliver their verdict. "Some people say
Bush and Blair should be put before a tribunal and I
say that you have the punishment in the political
field here," he said. "Their credibility has been
affected by this: Bush too lost some credibility."
He repeated accusations the US and British governments
were "hyped" intelligence and lacking critical
thinking. "They used exclamation marks instead of
question marks."
"I have some understanding for that. Politicians have
to simplify to explain, they also have to act in this
world before they have 100 per cent evidence. But I
think they went further."
"But I never said they had acted in bad faith," he
added. "Perhaps it was worse that they acted out of
good faith."
The threat allegedly posed by Saddam's WMD was the
prime reason cited by the British government for going
to war. But not a single item of banned weaponry has
been found in the 11 months that have followed the
declared end of hostilities.
Mr Blair will argue that similar decisive action will
need to be taken in future to combat the threat of
rogue states and terrorists obtaining WMD.
© 2004 Independent Digital (UK) Ltd
###
---------------
Jusfiq Hadjar gelar Sutan Maradjo Lelo
Allah yang disembah orang Islam tipikal dan yang digambarkan oleh al-Mushaf itu
dungu, buas, kejam, keji, ganas, zalim lagi biadab hanyalah Allah fiktif.
___________________________________________________________
Support the World Aids Awareness campaign this month with Yahoo! For Good
http://uk.promotions.yahoo.com/forgood/
Post message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
List owner : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Homepage : http://proletar.8m.com/
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/proletar/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/proletar/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
