Golden rice, red tape
Bio-fortified rice could save hundreds of thousands of lives a year, but
opposition to GM crops is still preventing its approval
* Henry Miller
* guardian.co.uk,
* Friday October 17 2008 21.30 BST
Biotechnology applied to crafting nutritional improvements in rice is on the
verge of offering the kinds of public health benefits to Asia we haven't seen
since the 20th-century's green revolution improved the nutrition and longevity
of billions of people.
Last month, the Swedish Academy of Agriculture and Forestry bestowed the
prestigious Bertebos prize on Swiss plant biologist Ingo Potrykus. He is the
co-inventor of "golden rice", a collection of new rice varieties biofortified,
or enriched, by the introduction of genes that express beta-carotene, the
precursor of vitamin A. (It is converted in the body, as needed, to the active
form.)
Why was this achievement important? After all, most physicians in North America
and Europe never see a single case of vitamin A deficiency in their
professional lifetimes. The situation is very different in poor developing
countries, however. Vitamin A deficiency is epidemic among the poor, whose diet
is heavily dominated by rice (which contains neither beta-carotene nor vitamin
A) or other carbohydrate-rich, vitamin-poor sources of calories.
In developing countries, 200-300 million children of preschool age are at risk
of vitamin A deficiency, which can be devastating and even fatal. It increases
susceptibility to common childhood infections such as measles and diarrhoeal
diseases and is the single most important cause of childhood blindness in
developing countries. Every year, about 500,000 children become blind as a
result of vitamin A deficiency, and 70% die within a year of losing their sight.
Why not simply supplement children's diets with vitamin A in capsules or add it
to some staple foodstuff, the way that we add iodine to table salt to prevent
hypothyroidism and goiter? A good idea in theory, except that neither the
resources – hundreds of millions of dollars annually – nor the infrastructure
for distribution are available.
Enter a better, cheaper, more feasible solution: golden rice, which actually
incorporates beta-carotene into the genetically altered rice grains. The
concept is simple: Although rice plants do not normally synthesise
beta-carotene in the endosperm (seeds) because of the absence of two necessary
enzymes of the biosynthetic pathway, they do make it in the green portions of
the plant. By using recombinant DNA, or gene-splicing, techniques to introduce
the two genes that express these enzymes, the pathway is restored and the rice
grains accumulate therapeutic amounts of beta-carotene.
Golden rice offers the potential to make contributions to human health and
welfare as monumental as the discovery and distribution of the Salk polio
vaccine. With wide use, it could save hundreds of thousands of lives a year and
enhance the quality of life for millions more.
But one aspect of this shining story is tarnished. Intransigent opposition by
anti-science, anti-technology activists - primarily Greenpeace, Friends of the
Earth and a few other groups – has spurred already risk-averse regulators to
adopt an overly precautionary approach that has stalled approvals.
There is nothing about golden rice that should require endless case-by-case
reviews and delays. As the British scientific journal Nature editorialised in
1992, a broad scientific consensus holds that "the same physical and biological
laws govern the response of organisms modified by modern molecular and cellular
methods and those produced by classical methods. ... [Therefore] no conceptual
distinction exists between genetic modification of plants and microorganisms by
classical methods or by molecular techniques that modify DNA and transfer
genes."
Putting it another way, government regulation of field research with plants
should focus on the traits that may be related to risk - invasiveness,
weediness, toxicity, and so forth - rather than on whether one or another
technique of genetic manipulation was used.
In spite of its vast potential to benefit humanity – and negligible likelihood
of harm to human health or the environment – nine years after its creation,
golden rice remains hung up in regulatory red tape with no end in sight. By
contrast, plants constructed with less precise techniques such as hybridisation
or mutagenesis are subject to no government scrutiny or requirements (or
opposition from activists) at all. And that applies even to the numerous new
plant varieties that have resulted from "wide crosses", hybridisations that
move genes from one species or genus to another – across what used to be
thought of as natural breeding boundaries.
In an April editorial in the journal Science, Nina Fedoroff, an eminent plant
geneticist at Penn State who is currently serving as senior scientific adviser
to Condoleezza Rice, wrote: "A new Green Revolution demands a global commitment
to creating a modern agricultural infrastructure everywhere, adequate
investment in training and modern laboratory facilities and progress toward
simplified regulatory approaches that are responsive to accumulating evidence
of safety. Do we have the will and the wisdom to make it happen?"
The golden rice story suggests that the answer is, not yet.
* guardian.co.uk © Guardian News and Media Limited 2008
---------------
Jusfiq Hadjar gelar Sutan Maradjo Lelo
Allah yang disembah orang Islam tipikal dan yang digambarkan oleh al-Mushaf itu
dungu, buas, kejam, keji, ganas, zalim lagi biadab hanyalah Allah fiktif.
Send instant messages to your online friends http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
------------------------------------
Post message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
List owner : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Homepage : http://proletar.8m.com/Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/proletar/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/proletar/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
