Buat yang mau memperluas cakrawala...

        Web address:
     http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/11/
     101105124241.htm   
New Statistical Model Moves Human Evolution Back Three Million Years
enlarge

A new statistical model suggests that evolutionary divergence of humans from 
chimpanzees likely occurred some 8 million years ago, rather than the 5 million 
year estimate widely accepted by scientists. (Credit: iStockphoto/Eric Gevaert)

ScienceDaily (Nov. 5, 2010) — Evolutionary divergence of humans from 
chimpanzees likely occurred some 8 million years ago rather than the 5 million 
year estimate widely accepted by scientists, a new statistical model suggests.

The revised estimate of when the human species parted ways from its closest 
primate relatives should enable scientists to better interpret the history of 
human evolution, said Robert D. Martin, curator of biological anthropology at 
the Field Museum, and a co-author of the new study appearing in the journal 
Systematic Biology. 

Working with mathematicians, anthropologists and molecular biologists, Martin 
has long sought to integrate evolutionary information derived from genetic 
material in various species with the fossil record to get a more complete 
picture.

Comparing DNA among related animals can provide a clear picture of how their 
shared genes evolved over time, giving rise to new and separate species, Martin 
said. But such molecular information doesn't yield a timetable showing when the 
genetic divergence occurred.

Fossil evidence is the only direct source of information about long-extinct 
species and their evolution, Martin and his colleagues said, but large gaps in 
the fossil record can make such information difficult to interpret. For a 
generation, paleontologists have estimated human origins at 5 million to 6 
million years ago.

But that estimate rests on a thin fossil record. By looking at all of today's 
primate species, all of the known fossil primates and using DNA evidence, 
computer models suggest a longer evolutionary timetable. The new analysis 
described in the Systematic Biology paper takes into account gaps in the fossil 
record and fills in those gaps statistically.

Such modeling techniques, which are widely used in science and commerce, take 
into account more overall information than earlier processes used to estimate 
evolutionary history using just a few individual fossil dates, Martin said. It 
can give scientists a broader perspective for interpreting data.

One example is a skull fossil discovered in Chad (central Africa) earlier in 
this decade. The fossil, named Sahelanthropus tchadensis and nicknamed Toumaï 
(which means "hope of life" in the local Goran language), raised great interest 
because it has many human characteristics. But consensus on how to classify the 
discovery has been elusive particularly because the fossil is about 7 million 
years old, well beyond the accepted time frame for human evolution.

Under the new estimate, Toumaï would fall within the period after the human 
lineage split from chimpanzees, Martin said.

The new approach to dating evolutionary history builds on earlier work by 
Martin and colleagues. In 2002, they published a paper in Nature that argues 
the last common ancestor of today's primates lived some 85 million years ago.

This implies that for 20 million years before dinosaurs became extinct, early 
versions of primates also lived and evolved. It challenged the accepted theory 
that primates and other mammals didn't really thrive on the planet until 
dinosaurs were gone.

After that paper was published, Martin said he expected someone would apply the 
new statistical techniques to the question of human evolution, but when no one 
did, "We decided to do it ourselves."
Email or share this story:
| More

Story Source:

    The above story is reprinted (with editorial adaptations by ScienceDaily 
staff) from materials provided by Field Museum, via EurekAlert!, a service of 
AAAS.

Journal Reference:

   1. R. D. Wilkinson, M. E. Steiper, C. Soligo, R. D. Martin, Z. Yang, S. 
Tavare. Dating Primate Divergences through an Integrated Analysis of 
Palaeontological and Molecular Data. Systematic Biology, 2010; DOI: 
10.1093/sysbio/syq054

Need to cite this story in your essay, paper, or report? Use one of the 
following formats:
APA

MLA
Field Museum (2010, November 5). New statistical model moves human evolution 
back three million years. ScienceDaily. Retrieved November 6, 2010, from 
http://www.sciencedaily.com­ /releases/2010/11/101105124241.htm

Note: If no author is given, the source is cited instead.




------------------------------------

Post message: [email protected]
Subscribe   :  [email protected]
Unsubscribe :  [email protected]
List owner  :  [email protected]
Homepage    :  http://proletar.8m.com/Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/proletar/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/proletar/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [email protected] 
    [email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Kirim email ke