Saya kutip:
"It takes a certain minimal intelligence for the truly dim to have a notion of
their own dimness, but this is denied George Bush. He has the self-awareness of
a bison"
--
Wednesday, 10 November 2010
'Unlike Mr Tony Blair, who emerges from his well-calibrated if often chilling
memoir as a man of colossal cleverness (though not intellect), W has the
self-awareness of a bison'
May the Lord the former president so ostentatiously worships have mercy on my
soul, and those in Iraq without water, electricity and medicine forgive me, but
I just cannot suppress a twinge of sympathy for George W Bush.
The source of this pity pang isn't the usual one with those struggling
bemusedly with the loss of power (Mrs Thatcher literally unable, for example,
to dial a phone number). So far as the practicalities, Mr Bush has adapted
well. Apparently he concludes his memoir Decision Points with the familiar
anecdote of how, within days of leaving Washington, he was picking up his dog's
mess with a plastic bag in a Texas park. Evidently he regards this as a cute
vignette of the transience of power, as well as his own endearing lack of pomp.
Yet what causes the stab of pity is the stupidity at which it hints.
How could anyone in possession of a three-figure IQ (still a moot point with
Bush) fail to see what a golden gift that image is to satirists? There he is,
in the cartoon in my head, scooping up a couple of Cumberland sausages while
following him, shovelling up the Augean Stable-sized steaming pile he left
behind in the Oval Office, is Barack Obama at the wheel of an industrial digger.
Related articles
* Do Bush's claims stand up under interrogation?
* Bush is back and he has 1.5 million books to shift
* John Walsh: Never mind the contents. I can't get past the title
* Leading article: We must judge Bush by his legacy, not his own words
* Search the news archive for more stories
This blindness to visual imagery is quite a motif, judging by Times extracts
and an interview with its editor. Apart from being attacked for indifference to
black people by Kanye West, the rapper Obama dismissed as a jackass, all his
greatest regrets are pictorial public relations disasters.
His sadness over Hurricane Katrina is not for the victims in New Orleans, as Mr
West understood, but for the damage done to his reputation by that snap of him
staring blankly and aloofly down on the catastrophe from the window of Air
Force One. His paramount distress over Iraq is not over the loss of life,
civilian and military, but how that banner proclaiming "Mission Accomplished"
on the aircraft carrier came to make him look naive and vainglorious. He
reveals his shallowness and vapidity with these reflections in the most
crystalline of clarity, and hasn't a notion he is doing so.
It takes a certain minimal intelligence for the truly dim to have a notion of
their own dimness, but this is denied him. Unlike Mr Tony Blair, who emerges
from his well-calibrated if often chilling memoir as a man of colossal
cleverness (though not intellect), W has the self-awareness of a bison. There
seems even less to him than met the eye, and there was precious little of that.
Astounding as it appears, we misoverestimated him.
And so the Wagner Question poses itself yet again. Every Saturday when the
Brazilian sea monster murders his X-Factor song, 14 million people ask
themselves how and why he is there. Reading these ghost-written titbits, you
ask yourself the same. How in the name of all the saints did George W Bush,
wastrel drunkard son of an East Coast patrician family, find his way to
Pennsylvania Avenue by playing the genial good ol' boy from the South, and why
in heaven's name did he want it anyway? And answers come there none.
The reduction of Bush's two terms to a satirical sequel to one of those US prep
school movies in which the smirking, idiot boy breaks the honour code but is
rescued by his Brahmin dad had come to seem shamefully hackneyed. But the one
cliché worth trotting out here is that clichés are clichés because they are
true. Somehow this half-witted frat boy journeyed, via some jovially
preposterous sequence of events involving failed oil deals and baseball team
franchises, from japes with Alpha Sigma Phi to possession of the nuclear codes.
Nothing, not even W himself, is ever quite that simple, and palpably there was
an edge of madness in the family. In his teens, when his mother Barbara had a
miscarriage, he relates, he drove her to the hospital. "I never expected to see
the remains of the foetus," he recalls, "which she had saved in a jar to bring
to the hospital. I remember thinking there was a human life, a little brother
or sister." Enough in that alone, to drive any adolescent to drink, you'd have
guessed, yet the tale is told as a homily to his mother's wisdom, and in some
impenetrable way to justify his pro-life, anti-stem cell research hard line.
Almost every sentence in the Times extraction (and it does feel like having a
tooth pulled) invokes a fatigued he-just-doesn't-get-it. Churchill is
inevitably adduced, while W bangs on about his passion for reading history.
Inevitably, he fails to make the connection.
"Study history, study history. In history lies all the secrets of statecraft,"
urged Winston, and while Bush did little as president other than read history
books, the stagecraft entirely eluded him. Some of those tomes must have dealt
with the British and Soviet experiences of invading Afghanistan, and not a word
sunk in. I know how that feels from a tussle with A Brief History of Time. The
difference is that I didn't extrapolate my failure to grasp a syllable into a
bold attempt to rewrite the laws of quantum physics. He assumed he could
rewrite the laws of geopolitics.
The process of historical revisionism has, like everything else, speeded
alarmingly in the internet age. The emergence of Sarah Palin as an imaginable
presidential candidate, allied to the unending travails of Obama, have induced
in the amnesiac, the obtuse and the plain bananas a fondness for the memory of
George W Bush.
It will not spread. If this great reader of history is concerned for his place
in it and that, needless to say, is why he hired a bright young groupie from
Yale to write this memoir in something approximating English he needn't fret.
In those few lists ranking all the presidents compiled since he left office, W
is invariably in the bottom five.
For the two imbecile wars he began, for condoning torture by denying
waterboarding was torture at all on the grounds that his lawyers said it was
legal; for turning the surplus he inherited from Bill Clinton into the
crippling deficit that is bringing the age of American hegemony to a
startlingly abrupt end; and for being the pitiably Wagnerian fool who stumbled
on to the grandest stage without any apparent clue why or for what earthly
purpose, there he will forever remain.
[email protected]
------------------------------------
Post message: [email protected]
Subscribe : [email protected]
Unsubscribe : [email protected]
List owner : [email protected]
Homepage : http://proletar.8m.com/Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/proletar/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/proletar/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
[email protected]
[email protected]
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[email protected]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
