Opinion
What will the Arab public think?
WikiLeaks 'Embassy Files' reveal gulf between Arab leaders and their
constituencies.
Lamis Andoni Last Modified: 29 Nov 2010 23:13 GMT
Andoni argues that Arab leaders fear Iran as a potential influence over their
constituencies [GALLO/GETTY]
Most Arab leaders want the US to tackle Iran, even to wage a war against the
country, but evidently do not say so publicly for fear of Arab public opinion
and reaction.
Confidential cables by American diplomats in the region, revealed by WikiLeaks,
expose weak and fearful Arab leaders who are dependent on US protection against
real and imagined fears over Iran's potential possession of nuclear arms and
its influence in the Arab world.
Although the hostility of Arab leaders towards Iran is not a secret, the
documents published by a number of Western newspapers show that some Arab
governments appear more concerned with Iran than Israel; for while Israel is
seen as an enemy that occupies Arab land and may cause instability in the
region, Iran is feared as a country that could mobilise Arab public support
against their leaders.
In their conversations with American officials, Arab leaders refer to Iran as
"a snake", "evil" and "an octopus whose tentacles need to be severed" -
presumably they are far more cautious in their labelling of Israel when talking
to US diplomats.
Establishing Iranian 'emirates'
The fear that Iran could stir internal dissent and even insurgencies centres on
two points; firstly its role in countering Israel, mainly through its support
for Hezbollah and Hamas, and secondly, its influence on Shia communities in
some Gulf states.
In the disclosed documents several Arab leaders sound unsure and lacking in
self-confidence as they express concern that US engagement with Iran will fail
to contain "the Iranian threat" and urge the US to stop Iran "at any cost".
What is most striking is that some Arab officials appear to believe that the
cost of war against Iran, in terms of regional instability, is less than the
cost they may pay if Iran is "not stopped".
"Bomb Iran, or live with an Iranian bomb. Sanctions, carrots, incentives won't
matter," a cable quoted Zaid Al Rifai, the head of the Jordanian senate and
father of the current Jordanian prime minister, as saying. While Rifai, the
brief continues, judged that a military strike would have a "catastrophic
impact on the region," he nonetheless thought that preventing Iran from
acquiring nuclear weapons would pay enough dividends to make that risk
worthwhile.
While Arab leaders appear far more concerned about a nuclear Iran than a
nuclear Israel, it is difficult to draw any comparisons as there is a marked
absence of any mention of Arab leaders' views on Israel in the documents
published so far. In fact, this has raised some speculation in the Arab world
that the leaks may be a deliberate attempt to pressure Arab leaders to join an
alliance with Israel against Iran. And while the documents reveal Arab leaders
who are more obsessed with Iran than Israel, none of them indicate that there
has been any official acceptance of the formation of an anti-Iranian pact with
Israel.
Nevertheless, and even allowing for reservations about the nature of the leaks,
the picture that emerges is one of feeble Arab leaders at the mercy of the US
and pleading for Uncle Sam's protection.
The documents reveal that Gulf leaders in particular are afraid that Iran will
use its influence over their Shia constituencies and its support for Hamas and
Hezbollah to establish strongholds inside Arab countries. One UAE leader is
quoted as saying that "Iran is establishing 'emirates' across the Muslim world,
including south Lebanon and Gaza, sleeper 'emirates' in Kuwait, Bahrain and the
eastern province of Saudi Arabia, the mother of all 'emirates' in southern
Iraq, and now Saada [in Yemen]".
They do not appear to be as afraid about the possibility of Iran using nuclear
weapons - once it develops them - as they are about how nuclear capability has
already emboldened, and will continue to embolden, the Islamic Republic to act
as "a superpower in the region".
But, critically, what the documents do not reveal is the pressure the US exerts
on Arab governments to take steps against Iran. And by excluding this
information, the documents offer a somewhat misleading portrayal of the US as
favouring 'engagement', while the Arabs urge the use of force.
The regional superpower
The truth may be more complex than the published documents suggest, since Arab
leaders are vulnerable to US pressure. However, what is evident, as most
clearly articulated by Jordanian officials, is that many of the pro-Western
Arab governments fear an Iranian-American understanding at their expense. At
the root of this sentiment is concern that the US will come to accept Iran as
the main regional power and eventually accept Iranian-supported upheaval within
Arab states.
Gulf states like Bahrain, Kuwait and Saudi Arabia fear that their Shia
constituencies will, with Iranian support, turn against their governments,
while Jordan and Egypt fear that Iran will back the Sunni Muslim Brotherhood or
at least encourage the radicalisation of the Arab public - particularly if no
resolution to the Palestinian crisis is forthcoming.
The documents do not present a complete picture, but they do reveal the gap
between Arab leaders and their constituencies.
Iran's much feared influence is to a large extent the result of Israel's
continued occupation of Arab land and the lack of progress in Arab-Israeli
negotiations. Iranian support for Hamas and, more so, Hezbollah - the only
movement that has forced an Israeli withdrawal from occupied Arab land - casts
Arab governments in a negative light by exposing their impotence vis-à-vis
Israel.
The WikiLeaks revelations will further erode the image of Arab leaders in Arab
public opinion and make it more difficult for them to publicly advocate a war
against Iran. Even if some of the fears expressed by Arab leaders are shared by
segments of the Arab people, any official Arab attempt, beyond the closed doors
of meetings with US officials, to make Iran, rather than Israel, the enemy will
backfire.
Lamis Andoni is an analyst and commentator on Middle Eastern and Palestinian
affairs.
The views expressed in this article are the author's own and do not necessarily
reflect Al Jazeera's editorial policy.
Source:
Al Jazeera
------------------------------------
Post message: [email protected]
Subscribe : [email protected]
Unsubscribe : [email protected]
List owner : [email protected]
Homepage : http://proletar.8m.com/Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/proletar/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/proletar/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
[email protected]
[email protected]
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[email protected]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
