http://www.aawsat.com/english/news.asp?section=2&id=23763


Sudan: What will happen to the North after secession?

13/01/2011 
By Osman Mirghani



"Bye Bye to the North".This is how the southerners expressed their joy as they 
voted in the referendum on self-determination, concluding that secession will 
take place even before the end of the voting process. The result of this 
referendum has been known and determined even before the southerners went to 
the poling stations, because indicators have shown that this secession has been 
coming for years. Any rational person, who read the events and understood the 
significance of the policies that were applied on the ground, could tell that 
the North and South were heading towards separation. 

Yet it is remarkable that the southerners' joy, regarding the forthcoming 
secession of South Sudan has been matched by the joy seen in some circles 
affiliated with the Khartoum regime. Editor-in-chief of the al-Intibaha 
newspaper Al-Tayeb Mustafa, who also happens to be Sudanese President Omar 
al-Bashir's uncle, wrote an article calling on the people of northern Sudan to 
sacrifice animals in celebration [of the south's secession] and to offer 
prayers in thanks, as the referendum represents a day of release for the North. 
He even went on to say that "God has removed what has harmed us and released 
us, and [Yassir] Arman, [Malik] Aqqar, and [Abd Al Aziz] al-Halo, and their 
followers (of northern leaders and elements of the SPLM) and those atheists who 
resemble them will not be able to stop us, we will begin our battle with them 
from today, God willing."

These extreme words do not come from someone on the fringes, but rather from 
someone who is close to government circles, writing in a newspaper that is 
published with official consent, therefore this article reflects the trend 
found amongst the ruling National Congress Party [NCP], and amongst the 
National Islamic Front, which hides behind the NCP, and which has held power 
since it orchestrated a coup in 1989. The attitude of this radical trend within 
the government is an alarming indication that there will be a period of 
repression and strict rule in the future, as well as the possibility of 
escalation and confrontation in the North. It is [also] true that there are 
parties within the regime that support the idea of expanding the government, 
and allowing opposition forces to participate within it, before the new 
Southern State is officially declared in July. This would mean that all parties 
would then become involved in the issue of secession, and the government would 
not bear the sole responsibility [for this]. However, such parties seem to be 
in the minority so far, because the regime believes it was appointed to control 
the North, and the recent elections have extended al-Bashir and the NCP's time 
in power. The regime will not accept power-sharing with an opposition it feels 
is weak and fragmented, unless this opposition's superficial presence in 
government serves its objectives, or if there is change in the course of events 
that threatens the government's survival. What is strange is that some state 
officials have begun to issue statements to the effect that the government, and 
the ruling NCP, are not responsible for the secession of the South. Instead, 
they argue that responsibility lies with the West, and Israel, because they 
encouraged the southerners to secede. This is of course a well known 
accusation, and a "broken record" in the Arab world, and we have heard this 
many times before. Responsibility cannot be avoided in this case. The regime, 
any regime, is responsible for the consequences of its policies and the 
agreements that it signs. The unity of the state is the responsibility of the 
government, and the failure to ensure and protect this ultimately represents 
the failure of the regime, because the survival of the nation is more important 
than the survival of the regime. 

There can be no doubt that the Sudanese regime has adopted a strategy to deal 
with the post-secession phase, and so far what has been revealed of this is the 
imposition of a new political agenda, in line with the ideology and agenda of 
the National Islamic Front. The plan is for the Sudanese streets to be occupied 
by matters away from the subject of the South. President al-Bashir has talked 
about amending the constitution, and moving towards an Islamic state. Al-Bashir 
is supported in this by his Vice President Ali Osman Taha, who has been a 
prominent leader within the National Islamic Front since the military coup was 
carried out 21 years ago, and who some say is the man holding the strings in 
the regime and the ruling NCP. To return to talking about the subject of an 
Islamic state, the objective of this is to repel attacks on the government as a 
result of secession. This would see any attack or opposition branded as 
opposition to the Islamization of the state. It was interesting that when the 
call to Islamize the Sudanese state first emerged, a foreign Islamist group 
issued a statement in support of Sudan, in its confrontation with "foreign 
conspiracies", calling on the state to prohibit the referendum on southern 
secession. Much can be said about this statement which was issued by a group of 
"Muslim scholars" and about the fact that it came too late to have any effect. 
However, the most important observation is that many of the signatories of this 
statement were also signatories to previous statements, in support of the 
National Islamic Front in Sudan, whilst others were members of movements led by 
Dr Hassan al-Turabi after Saddam Hussein's invasion of Kuwait. 

It is not likely that many Sudanese have forgotten that when the current regime 
first came to power it raised Islamic slogans; however this was something which 
was accompanied by severe repressive measures. As a result, many people today 
are fearful that matters are moving once again towards severe repression, 
particularly as the regime is anxious about the possible escalation of the 
Darfur crisis, as well as the country's economic problems, as it will have lost 
a high percentage of its oil resources with the secession of the south. 


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

Post message: [email protected]
Subscribe   :  [email protected]
Unsubscribe :  [email protected]
List owner  :  [email protected]
Homepage    :  http://proletar.8m.com/Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/proletar/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/proletar/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [email protected] 
    [email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Kirim email ke