http://www.atimes.com/atimes/China/MA29Ad03.html

Jan 29, 2011

BOOK REVIEW
The party principle 


Red Capitalism: The Fragile Financial Foundation of China's Extraordinary Rise 

by Carl E Walter and Fraser J T Howie 

Reviewed by Benjamin A Shobert 

For a brief period in the late 1990s and early 2000s, it was possible - even 
fashionable - for critics of China to write polemic accounts predicting the 
country's imminent demise. 

The seemingly impossible task of equitably lifting almost a billion 
still-impoverished Chinese out of poverty, the central government's dangerous 
dance with nationalism - testing wounds from World War II still not healed - 
and the country's corrupt bureaucracy, all, and even more still, seemed 
perfectly reasonable concerns that would cause China's growth to stop, and the 
country to again implode. 

But in the time since most of these books were written, it was not China's 
economy that imploded, nor China's tenuous embrace of nationalism that provoked 
unnecessary conflicts. No, it was the American economy and political system 
that managed to do both. 


Were each of these criticisms, whether they attempted to shine light on China's 
culture or economy, the country's history or politics, simply wrong? Hyperbole 
and rhetoric may have been the foundational errors of many of these critics, as 
they attempted to read too much meaning into the sort of internal complexities 
and contradictions that plague any country and a developing one even more so. 

Or was it simply a matter of timing; will those structural flaws ultimately 
handicap China? Painting with too broad a brush may be partially to blame, an 
error more likely made by those who fundamentally disbelieve in China's 
potential and promise, who distrust that the country's Marxist-Leninist past 
could be somehow molded into a real economic miracle. 

This sort of over-reach, especially in the face of America's own domestic 
malaise, makes the work of authors such as Carl Walter and Fraser Howie in 
their new book Red Capitalism: the Fragile Financial Foundation of China's 
Extraordinary Rise that much more valuable. Limited in scope to the question of 
China's financial system, Walter and Howie's at times technical analysis of the 
country's debt market manages to use a very targeted evaluation of the 
country's financial system in ways that lead the reader to ask much bigger 
questions, while at the same time also accommodating the authors' genuine 
respect for China's economic success story. 

Walter and Howie believe that China's economic miracle cannot, and should not, 
be understood without first an appreciation of the jumbled and intertwined 
motives, players and mechanisms that comprise the country's financial markets. 
From their perspective, most important are Beijing's motives for empowering 
China's financial system. 

As any visitor to China can admit, the country's political system and its 
seemingly free-wielding embrace of Western capitalism, is a confusing and - at 
times - intoxicating experience. Early into a personal experience traveling 
China, Americans knowledgeable about Beijing's ongoing suppression of opposing 
voices and its uneven record on religious freedoms run smack into a corner Best 
Buy or Starbucks, and seeing in Shanghai what they can find in Tampa are left 
with profound confusion about what really animates and defines China. 

These sorts of externals - the transplanted Western hotels, restaurants and 
retailers - lead many outsiders to assume that, whatever differences might 
exist between China and the US, they are matters that time and China's ongoing 
development will resolve. 

But Walter and Howie see deeper disconnects, as evidenced most directly in the 
actual motives behind Beijing's tenuous accommodation of the country's 
financial markets. According to the authors, China's embrace of the free market 
is a means to an end, and the end is simply put to maintain their political 
power: "The resemblance of today's commercial sector in China, both foreign and 
local, to that of merchants in traditional, Confucian China is marked: it is 
there to be used tactically by the Party and is not allowed to play a dominant 
role." (p 10) 

This relationship has served China's political class, and as the authors are 
quick to point out, the 300 million Chinese who have been lifted from poverty 
in the last several decades, quite well. But to attract the sorts of long-term 
investment by outsiders that China needs in order to improve the quality of 
life of its billion still-impoverished citizens, Fraser and Howie question 
whether the country can continue to walk such a fine line. 

They point towards the country's lack of underlying transparency, not only 
related to the role of the Party in decisions made, or strategies pursued by, 
State Owned Enterprises (SOEs), but in disclosure of the liabilities from both 
the public and private sectors within China. Writing about the matter of how 
China's financial markets value risk, they state: 


  The engine at the heart of the debt markets is the valuation of risk and this 
is missing in China because the Party controls interest rates. Similarly, the 
heart of a stock market is the valuation of companies and this is also missing 
in China because the Party controls the ownership of listed companies. Private 
property is not the central organizing concept of the Chinese economy; rather, 
the central organizing concept is tied to control and ownership by the 
Communist Party. Given this basic premise, markets cannot be used as the means 
to allocate scarce resources and drive economic development. This role belongs 
to the Party which, to achieve its own ends, actively manipulates both the 
stock and debt markets. (p 147)
The net result of this mixed model is that China is trying to have it both 
ways: the capital from outsiders, which drives domestic investment, but with 
only a cosmetic head-nod to the sorts of transparency, and ultimately 
accountability, which comes with open markets. The awkward combination is 
necessary so that Party functionaries can redirect capital at their whims, 
absent either disclosure of their involvement or the sort of rationalization 
mechanisms which are necessary for capitalism to work. 

On this point, the authors write, "An inherently conservative political class, 
whose natural instinct is to control, will not easily invite those it cannot 
easily control to participate actively in its domestic debt markets. But, as 
appearances have to be preserved, there will always be slight movements toward 
market opening. But there will be no true opening." (p 108) The consequence of 
this uneven embrace of market-makers? Capital deployment is likely chronic 
overcapacity in certain key industries, and likely excessive infrastructure 
building - both of which are problems that could soon become evident. 

Anticipating that some readers may want to point towards China's burgeoning 
stock market as further evidence of the country's commitment to financial 
reform, Walter and Howie are quick to point out that even this traditionally 
very powerful capitalist tool is beset by the Party's agenda: 
  If one looks at incremental capital raising, it is obvious the stock markets 
in Hong Kong, Shenzhen and Shanghai are an afterthought ... in the stock 
markets as well, the huge deposits placed by institutional investors seeking 
share allocations in the primary market are also funded by loans from banks. In 
China, the banks are everything. The Party knows it, and uses them as both its 
weapon and its shield. (p 29) 
Where in genuinely capitalist economies the equity and debt markets are part 
of, but not wholly encompassed by, the banking system, in China no such 
distinction can be made: the bank is the state, and vice versa. 

This raises the question of how China's financial system will withstand a 
crisis. It is possible Beijing's ability to exert almost complete control over 
the banking system, currency and equity markets would be benefits. Unlike truly 
capitalist economies, in the throes of a serious systemic banking collapse, 
China's government can play a much more direct and heavy-handed role. But such 
a response would have to be short term, lest too-long and too-great a role by 
the Party signals outsiders that China's financial markets are fundamentally 
flawed, realms where traditional valuation techniques no longer apply. 

Acknowledging the underlying demographics which will continue to power China 
forward, the authors of Red Capitalism write, "Given China's geographical size 
and huge population, it is unlikely that its economy will grind to a halt in 
the way Japan's did after its magnificent run in the 1980s." (p 210) 

In the midst of a book largely critical of China's financial system, the 
authors manage to always acknowledge the real progress made by China's 
governing party and the underlying forces which should continue to make the 
country an attractive market. In this spirit, the book's treatment of China's 
financial market always manages to be reasonable without resorting to rhetoric. 

Towards the end of the book is one of the more interesting and provocative 
conclusions reached by Walter and Howie on what many in Washington believe is 
the most important point which should drive US-China economic dialogue: the 
valuation of the yuan (renminbi - RMB). 

China's leadership has looked at the economic destruction wrought by the Asian 
financial crisis of 1997, and Japan's ongoing battle with economic stagnation 
and come to a simple conclusion: they were both the result of countries that 
lost control of their currency. 

At their core, Beijing's economic team simply will not relinquish this lesson, 
and those in Washington who insist on making it front and center are setting 
both countries up for a magnificent disagreement. Writing on this, the authors 
say: 
  China knows well that when Japan freed up the yen to appreciate and 
deregulated its financial markets, it was entering the last stage of its wild 
asset bubble. The Party will perhaps allow the RMB to appreciate a little to 
defuse diplomatic tensions, but it will never make the currency freely 
convertible. (p 210)
Very early in Red Capitalism, Walter and Howie write, "China's banks look 
strong, but are fragile; in this, they are emblematic of the country itself. 
The Chinese are masters of the surface and excel at burying the telling detail 
in the passage of time." (p 27) 

As 2011 begins, two questions weigh heavily on policy makers: first, will the 
American political system prove capable of an adult conversation about the 
necessary choices we must make and second, how will China's political system 
respond to an economic shock that is likely to come from within their own 
borders? 

If Walter and Howie are right, China may be approaching a period when it can no 
longer hide the systemic flaws in its banking system; the more profound and 
problematic question the authors of Red Capitalism want their readers to ask is 
what this means for China as a whole. The answer will likely impact not just 
the Chinese, but people around the world as well. 

Red Capitalism: The Fragile Financial Foundation of China's Extraordinary Rise 
by Carl E Walter and Fraser J T Howie. Wiley (February 15, 2011). ISBN-10: 
0470825863. Price US$29.95, 256 pages. 

Benjamin A Shobert is the managing director of Teleos Inc (www.teleos-inc.com), 
a consulting firm dedicated to helping Asian businesses bring innovative 
technologies into the North American market. 

(Copyright 2011 Asia Times Online (Holdings) Ltd. All rights reserved. Please 
contact us about sales, syndication and republishing

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

Post message: [email protected]
Subscribe   :  [email protected]
Unsubscribe :  [email protected]
List owner  :  [email protected]
Homepage    :  http://proletar.8m.com/Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/proletar/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/proletar/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [email protected] 
    [email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Kirim email ke