http://www.aawsat.com/english/news.asp?section=2&id=23980

Is it a crisis for the Egyptian regime alone?

31/01/2011 
By Tariq Alhomayed


Some Arab satellite channels are always trying to distract us with debates 
which are far-removed from reality, and do not touch on the essence of matters 
in our region. The simplest example of this is the current debate about the 
situation in Egypt, which has been ongoing since the "Day of Rage" 
demonstrations. 

The Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak, no matter what his opponents say, is not 
like Saddam Hussein, or Zine el-Abidine Ben Ali, or other rulers in the region. 
Mubarak is a president with history, part of which the Egyptians themselves are 
proud of. He is a patriot, with experience of both war and peace. Mubarak is 
neither a dictator, nor is he democratic, and this is the crux of the matter. 
The issue here is not President Mubarak, or the rest of the Arab leaders, as 
much as it is a crisis for Arab republics on the whole. 

The crisis concerning our Arab republics is that they are governed by an 
approach closer to monarchical rule. Yet they are not monarchies, and thus the 
Arab republic will always find itself at an impasse, whether it is today, or in 
a few years. Some leaders of Arab republics have even lived through several 
kings and princes. The kings have changed, but the presidents remained the 
same. This is the real crisis, whereby the principle of a fixed-term presidency 
does not exist. Therefore, regimes in the region ultimately arrive at an 
impasse, using whatever tricks they can, which results in a crisis of 
legitimacy. 

When I blame some of our satellite channels for distracting us from the debate, 
and distorting our perceptions, this is for the simple reason that we always 
see a strong focus on Egypt. This is not necessarily true today, because the 
current coverage is justified, but [satellite channels have focused on Egypt] 
for a long time. This is largely because the Mubarak regime allowed an 
unprecedented level of media freedom, compared to our other republics. Take 
Lebanon for example, where the media does not dare say a word against Hassan 
Nasrallah-despite the fact he was elected by no-one- or speak out against Iran, 
where the people have complained of electoral fraud. Our satellite channels 
ignored what happened in Lebanon when Syria imposed changes to the Lebanese 
constitution, and extended President Lahoud's term in office. Matters 
ultimately came to a tragic end with the assassination of Rafik Hariri and his 
associates, and the country came to a stage whereby if Nasrallah wanted to 
become Prime Minster, he would have to be considered a Sunni!

Thus the bulk of debate leaves behind the essence of the problem, and only 
scratches the surface. The crisis is not specific to the Egyptian regime, but 
it concerns all Arab republics. If Mubarak's opponents were blaming his regime 
yesterday for being an agent of America, how can they blame Washington today 
for not taking a strong stand against him? They forget that there are other 
Arab republics, where the situation is worse than that of the Egyptian regime, 
but matters are still concealed from the media domain. Those who are demanding 
American intervention [in Egypt] forget that Washington allowed Nuri al-Maliki 
to take a second term in office in Iraq, despite the fact that he lost the 
election! Are we experiencing a case of Arab hypocrisy, or are we just lost? 
What about the Sudanese regime for example, or other republics, both near and 
far from Egypt?

Here I am not defending the Egyptian regime, but rather this is a call to be 
rational, and contemplate matters, instead of being emotional. It appears that 
the only way out [of this impasse] for our republics is to follow the Turkish 
model. Under this system, the army plays the role of the initial guarantor, and 
authority, until suitable candidates emerge in field of politics. This happens 
as a result of constitutional amendments, of course beginning with a defined 
presidential term. This is what we see forming in Tunisia today, and this is 
also what appears to be happening in Egypt. 


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

Post message: [email protected]
Subscribe   :  [email protected]
Unsubscribe :  [email protected]
List owner  :  [email protected]
Homepage    :  http://proletar.8m.com/Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/proletar/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/proletar/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [email protected] 
    [email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Kirim email ke