http://www.aawsat.com/english/news.asp?section=2&id=24139

The collapse of the theory "they can speak, and we can ignore"

13/02/2011
By Tariq Alhomayed


The regime of the former Egyptian President practiced a theory of media 
freedom, along the lines of "let them speak". In other words let the press say 
what it wants, for they have the freedom to criticize, whilst the state has the 
freedom to ignore it. Today, the Egyptian regime has paid the price for this 
failed methodology.

Away from the controversy surrounding the numbers, and proportion of those 
demonstrating in Tahrir Square, and whether or not they represented all 
Egyptians, it is clear that media criticism, and its coverage of corruption, 
flaws and deficiencies in Egyptian institutions, which have failed to produce 
tangible solutions, has led to a popular uprising which affected the entire 
spectrum of Egyptian people. They saw the shortcomings in front of them, 
without any signs of reform, despite all that had been published [to the 
contrary] in the media. The regime believed that a policy of negligence, whilst 
"letting the [people] speak", would appease matters and prevent an uprising. 
This was not the case, and the evidence of this failed theory lies not in the 
volume of demonstrators, but in their determination to be resolute.

The theory of freedom to publish anything, offset by the state's right to 
ignore what is published, has proved unsuccessful. The youth revolution, and 
its wide ranging popular support, is testament to that. Of course, it was also 
not possible for the Egyptian regime, or other ruling systems in the Arab 
world, to pursue a policy of enforced silence and oppression these days, in 
light of modern means of communication, and a level of media openness which 
cannot be controlled as it has been in the past. The only solution was for Arab 
governments to shake off the dust of negligence, fight against their 
shortcomings and corruption, and deal with their problems seriously. If Arab 
governments had spent the same time and effort on reform as they had spent on 
denying or justifying certain practices, then the Arab situation would be in a 
much better state. If governments had responded to press criticism, and even 
utilized it as a watchdog, then the situation would be greatly improved, and 
our states would have avoided many problems. The Egypt lesson is a large one, 
and if one considers the mistakes made by the regime, and there were many, the 
most notable conclusion is that the freedom to neglect has serious 
consequences. It leads to social congestion, consolidates despair amongst 
citizens, and leaves the country vulnerable towards considerable losses.

Egypt is a significant country, in terms of its location, size and population, 
and likewise in terms of its thought. However, we have seen how the regime 
failed to understand its country's youth, and how they think. President Mubarak 
was too late in acknowledging Egypt's youth, for it was not until his third 
public address [during the crisis], when he finally directed his words towards 
the young people in Tahrir Square. Major Omar Suleiman pledged, before the 
President stepped down, to preserve the achievements of the youth revolution. 
Even western newspapers were not calling it a 'revolution' at that time, yet 
Suleiman acknowledged it as such. This shows that the regime realized it had 
not understood over half of its people [Egypt's youth population], because it 
did not take them seriously, and had dealt with them by ignoring their demands. 
Yet how could the regime now claim to take them seriously, as long as people 
like Dr. Boutros Boutros-Ghali were saying, in the newspaper "al-Masri 
al-Yaum", that a foreign organization was behind the protests, perhaps 
communist, Wahhabi, Shiite or Zionist? Imagine, is there anything more absurd 
than this, especially when these words came from a diplomat and former Minister 
of Foreign Affairs, who was even Secretary General of the United Nations?

Therefore, we can say that the theory "they have the right to say what they 
want, and we have the right to ignore it" has collapsed, and this has brought 
with it a heavy price. Will we benefit from the lesson? 


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

Post message: [email protected]
Subscribe   :  [email protected]
Unsubscribe :  [email protected]
List owner  :  [email protected]
Homepage    :  http://proletar.8m.com/Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/proletar/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/proletar/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [email protected] 
    [email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Kirim email ke