China hardens stance against Libyan air strikes
By Eric Olander the 24/03/2011 - 18:26

The Chinese government is stepping up its demands that the Western coalition 
halt air strikes on Libya. Beijing called for an immediate ceasefire on 
Thursday and warned an even larger humanitarian crisis is in the making.

The Chinese government stepped up its criticism on Thursday of US and European 
air strikes on Libya. "We believe that the objective of enforcing the U.N. 
Security Council resolution is to protect humanitarian (objectives) and not to 
create an even bigger humanitarian disaster," foreign ministry spokeswoman 
Jiang Yu said at a regular news briefing in Beijing.

Jiang's comments are just the latest in a series critical signals to come from 
Beijing over how the coalition is implementing United Nations resolution 1973 
that authorised the creation of a no-fly zone over Libya and the bombing of 
ground targets.

Although China abstained from the vote, Beijing has been very clear in its 
position that the coalition air attacks risk killing civilians and should be 
halted immediately. 

Chinese trade with Libya

Libya, like other countries in Africa, is an increasingly important Chinese 
trading partner. Prior to the current unrest, there was an estimated 35,000 
Chinese expatriates in the country who largely worked on multi-billion dollar 
construction projects.

These infrastructure deals point to an increasingly close Sino-Libyan 
cooperation with Chinese investment in the country totalling an estimated 10 
billion dollars and bilateral trade last year nearing seven billion dollars.

For some perspective on Chinese policy in Libya, France24.com sat down with 
China-Africa relations scholar Deborah Brautigam of the American University in 
Washington, D.C. Professor Brautigam is the author of "The Dragon's Gift: The 
Real Story of China in Africa" and blogs on the issue at "China in Africa: The 
Real Story."

What was behind China's decision to support economic sanctions against Libya 
and not block the passage of United Nations resolution 1973 that authorized 
military force against the Libyan government?
 
Well, the way I saw it was there was a domestic concern amongst the Chinese 
leadership. They were looking at companies that are doing huge number of 
construction projects across Libya. Those Chinese companies were being attacked 
and the Chinese were having to send in ships and send in planes to evacuate 
people. So I think if the people in China had seen their government appearing 
to [ignore the attacks]  on Chinese companies [it would be seen] as the Chinese 
government not protecting the Chinese people. 
 
Where is the balance of interests for the Chinese in Libya between their 
economic investments and their political objectives internationally?
 
I think it's a combination of interests but what is always foremost in Chinese 
concerns with the Security Council is they do not want to set a precedent to 
have the Security Council be turned against China when they're dealing with 
their internal disputes as in Xinjiang, Tibet or Taiwan. They don't want to set 
a precedent for Security Council action against them.
 
So that's always a delicate dance. Now the commercial interests are there as 
well and we can see that in cases where there are strong commercial interests. 
For example, in Sudan there's been much more of an attempt by the Chinese 
political machine and diplomats at the UN to water down sanctions that would 
hurt Chinese economic interests.  
 
In Libya it's a somewhat different situation. They don't have oil interests 
that are very large. They don't have a lot of oil installations, they're doing 
exploration, but there isn't much that they control there.
 
Most of the Chinese business activity in Libya has been in construction. I was 
looking back on some of the statistics on this and in 2008 they signed US$10 
billion in construction contracts. So this is a lot of business but it's not 
something that they need to protect through trying to hold off on sanctions. 
 
Does China see its interests more aligned with African and Arab than it does 
with the West or the UN?
 
That's an interesting question. The Chinese are always looking to taking the 
pulse of African states and Middle Eastern states and if the Arab League had 
not come out in support of this no-fly zone or in support of sanctions I don't  
think the Chinese would have joined in, not nearly as easily as they did.  
 
So the Arab League was in support and the Chinese went along.  Unfortunately, 
African governments and the African Union have not been forceful on the 
Zimbabwe issue or the Sudan Darfur issue so the Chinese have been taking their 
cues from that as well. So they see there are a whole lot of countries in 
Africa, 53 countries,who  have votes at the United Nations, anyone of them 
could flip over and recognize Taiwan.
 
There's a lot of concern in keeping those diplomatic relations happy but for 
the Chinese, of course, the United States and Europe are really important 
stakeholders in the global political economy and they care about we think but 
they also care a lot more then we do about what these other countries think.
 
 
Source URL: 
http://www.france24.com/en/20110324-china-libya-brautigam-un-airstrikes




------------------------------------

Post message: [email protected]
Subscribe   :  [email protected]
Unsubscribe :  [email protected]
List owner  :  [email protected]
Homepage    :  http://proletar.8m.com/Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/proletar/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/proletar/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [email protected] 
    [email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Kirim email ke