http://www.asiasentinel.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=3252&Itemid=367
China's Ominous South China Sea Claims Written by Our Correspondent Tuesday, 14 June 2011 The confrontation between China and Vietnam is a confrontation over ownership of the whole body of water Sloppy reporting is giving the impression that the most recent dispute in the South China Sea between China and Vietnam has been about the Spratly and Paracel islands. Instead, this clash was in fact was an illustration of China's claim to the whole South China Sea, reaching close to the territorial waters of Vietnam, Malaysia, Brunei and the Philippines rather than the islands. In this case, Chinese ships cut the cables of a Vietnamese sonar exploration vessel operating 120 nautical miles off the south-central Vietnam coast approximately due east of Nha Trang. No claim to the area where the Vietnamese ship was drilling could be made on the basis of sovereignty of all or any of the scattered groups of islets, rocks and reefs known as the Spratlys. Although almost none of the islands and rocks is capable of sustaining human habitation and the seabed is not part of a continental shelf there is an argument that they could support a claim for a 200 mile exclusive economic zone (EEZ) if it did not conflict with any other 200 mile claim. In this case the nearest of the Spratlys is at least 180 nautical miles from where the Vietnamese ship was attacked and clearly much closer to the Vietnam coast and on its continental shelf while the Spratlys lie the other side of deep water.. Likewise the Vietnamese vessel was well over 200 miles from the closest of the Paracel Islands, the group of sandy islands and banks off the northern coast of Vietnam which were seized by China in 1974, just before the reunification of Vietnam. The distinction between island claims and sea claims is critical because it also involves the US. Washington remains neutral on the validity of the competing and overlapping islands claims but it is adamant about freedom of passage, including through EEZs. Hence it will in practice always line up against China's claims to the whole sea and also to China's narrow interpretation of freedom of passage. The Chinese action thus should be sending further warnings to Malaysia, the Philippines, Brunei and Indonesia about the extent of China's claims over the sea and the resources under its seabed. Existing gas fields off Palawan and Sarawak are already within areas claimed by China on its maps of the sea. The same applies to the huge gas fields, yet to be developed, close to Indonesia's Natuna islands, even though the islands themselves have not (as yet) been claimed by China. The Philippines has begun to react against the latest Chinese harassment of its fishermen operating in waters less than 200 miles off the Philippine coast with calls for strengthening of its feeble naval forces. It is also insisting that the seas generally known in English as the South China Sea should be known at least locally as the West Philippine Sea (the sea to the east of the Philippine archipelago is known as the Philippine Sea). China simply calls it the South Sea, Vietnam the East Sea. It was once known as the Cham sea - after the seafaring Malay-speaking Hindi kingdom which earlier flourished in central Vietnam. In the past, perceiving the Philippines to be weak China has often focused its attention on this part of its claim. Indeed its 1995 occupation of Mischief Reef (Panganiban island, Meiji Jiao) 130 miles off the Palawan coast in 1995, allegedly just a shelter for fishermen, was one of China's more provocative acts. In 2002 there was an agreement with ASEAN for peaceful resolution of sea disputes but this only caused a pause in disputes. ASEAN's problem however is that some members are reluctant to address the sea issue and China itself will only deal with it on a country-to-country basis, thus weakening such solidarity as ASEAN members can show. It does not help that Malaysia has been so far let alone by China, and Kuala Lumpur is keen not to attract Chinese anger by supporting Vietnam and the Philippines openly. To do so might cause Beijing to raise the explosive issue of Malay racial discrimination against its ethic Chinese citizens. But Vietnam is clearly made of sterner stuff and with its new cozy relationship with Washington (and links with Russia and India) are likely to be more effective in dealing with China than waffle from ASEAN's feel-good foreign ministries. [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] ------------------------------------ Post message: [email protected] Subscribe : [email protected] Unsubscribe : [email protected] List owner : [email protected] Homepage : http://proletar.8m.com/Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/proletar/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/proletar/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: [email protected] [email protected] <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [email protected] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
