Hehehe ... jadi kalo ngehina auloh ga perlu dibunuh, cukup ybs bertobat. Tp kalo ngehina si nabi pedophile, hrs dibunuh, biarpun udah bertobat.
Berarti si keparat itu lebih tinggi derajatnya dr auloh. Cuma orang dungu yg ga ngeliat bhw Islam itu cuma bikinan orang Arab doang. >________________________________ >From: Bukan Pedanda <[email protected]> >To: [email protected] >Sent: Thursday, July 28, 2011 11:51 PM >Subject: [proletar] "Bunuh...bunuh...bunuh....", itulah Islam.. > > > > > >Translated from the original Arabic by Al Mutarjim > >The clip below was taken from an interview given by Shaykh Abu-Ishaq >al-Huwayni on the Egyptian satellite television station al-Hikma on July 7, >2011. Al-Huwayni here explains that whoever insults Muhammad, even if he later >repents, must be killed. > >Later in the interview, al-Huwayni went on to contrast this with the case of >one who insults Allah. He said that insulting Allah of course makes one an >infidel, which is agreed to by all Islamic scholars, yet the one who insults >Allah is not killed--he is merely called to repentance. This is because even >if the whole world insults Allah, it does not matter to him--it does not hurt >him. > >After recounting a hadith regarding Muhammad being mocked by poetry from the >Quraysh, al-Huwayni explained that Muhammad "had complete authority to waive >his right (to kill those who mocked him). But the ruler does not have the >authority to waive the Prophet's right." Al-Huwayni reported that Muhammad >could waive this right whenever he wanted, but after his death he retained >this right, meaning no one could waive the right for him. That is why those >who insult the Prophet now must be killed. > >He then narrated another hadith in which Abu-Bakr, the first rightly-guided >caliph of Islam, became furious with someone who had mocked him. Abu-Barza >offered to kill this man for Abu-Bakr. Abu-Bakr explained, however, that this >right (i.e. to kill the one who mocks the ruler) was not given to anyone after >Muhammad; or in other words, only Muhammad had the right to kill those who >mocked him. > >He said all of this in the context of the controversy in Egypt with the >Christian businessman Naguib Sawiris, a billionaire and founder of the Free >Egyptians Party. Late June 2011 Sawiris tweeted a picture of Mickey Mouse >wearing a Muslim beard and jilbab, and Minnie Mouse wearing a niqab, which was >considered to be mocking Islam. Al-Huwayni did not say explicitly that Sawiris >should be killed for mocking Islam, but did say that all of his companies >should be boycotted, even if he only owns 10% share in the company. > >Whoever insults the Prophet (PBUH), if he later comes and apologizes, and >kisses the shoes (of the ruler), and says, "I want all Muslims, every one, to >return and strike me with the soles of their feet"—does the ruler have the >right to accept this? > >I bring up this question, as it was asked of me. The answer is that it is not >permissible for anyone to accept this. Then what do we do with him? We kill >him! But he told you that he repented. We still kill him, even if he repents! > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] ------------------------------------ Post message: [email protected] Subscribe : [email protected] Unsubscribe : [email protected] List owner : [email protected] Homepage : http://proletar.8m.com/Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/proletar/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/proletar/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: [email protected] [email protected] <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [email protected] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
