Ref: Dikatakan bahwa di Jakarta telah ada 60.000 orang yang memiliki satu juta 
dollar USA. Disamping mereka itu ada pula 20 orang (keluarga) yang mempunyai 
miliaran dollar. Entah berapa puluh juta orang lagi yang memiliki ratusan ribu 
dollar. Dalam laporan kekayaan sebelum Pemilu lalu dikatakan bahwa SBY memiliki 
uang tunai dalam mata uang asing kurang lebih US$ 230.000,— dan saham-saham. 
SBY dan mereka ini tentunya adalah orang-orang kaya bila dibandingkan dengan 
pemilikan dan pendapat mayoritas rakyat. Sangat menarik sekali apabila 
orang-orang kaya Indonesia yang beriman memberikan zakat 10% dari kekayaan 
mereka pada hari raya agama sekarang ini. 

Selain itu apakah orang kaya Indonesia secara suka rela bersedia mengikuti 
jejak orang-orang kaya Europa dan USA yang bersedia agar pajak pendapatan dan 
kekayaan dinaikan?

Bila pendapatan pajak kekayaan kaum kaya Indonesia dinaikan maka akan mungkin 
sekali dapat dipergunakan untuk segara bisa membebaskan rakyat miskin Indonesia 
dari penderitaan selama 66 tahun merdeka tanpa diperpanjang waktunya dan 
kemiskinan akan hanya menjadi sejarah masa lampau. Menurut BPS jumlah kaum 
miskin melarat di Indoneia ada 32 juta orang.


Apakah kaum kaya Indonesia bersedia agar pajak mereka dinaikan sebagai 
solidaritas pemebrantas kemiskinan kepada bangsanya sendiri?


http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/aug/29/tax-us-more-say-wealthy-europeans
Tax us more, say wealthy Europeans
German group latest to volunteer for higher contributions, saying country could 
raise €100bn in two years with a 5% wealth tax

  a.. Helen Pidd in Berlin 
  b.. guardian.co.uk, Monday 29 August 2011 20.37 BST 
  c.. Article history
 
Ferrari chairman Luca di Montezemolo has said it is only right that the rich 
contribute more. Photograph: Thomas Lohnes/AFP/Getty Images
First it was Warren Buffett announcing that he and his chums had been "coddled 
long enough by a billionaire-friendly Congress".

Then Liliane Bettencourt, France's richest woman, who was at the centre of a 
tax scandal last year, signed a letter along with 15 other billionaires begging 
to make a special contribution to the treasury to help drag France out of the 
financial crisis.

Even an Italian got in the action, with the boss of Ferrari saying that as he 
was rich, it was only "right" that he stump up more cash.

Now, as both France and Spain consider introducing a wealth tax, a group of 50 
rich Germans have joined the "tax me harder" movement by renewing their open 
call to Angela Merkel to "stop the gap between rich and poor getting even 
bigger".

The German group, Vermögende für eine Vermögensabgabe (The Wealthy for a 
Capital Levy) is the latest manifestation of a feeling among some well-off 
individuals that the spare cash in their bank accounts might be able to ease, 
if not solve, the financial crises threatening to cripple their countries.

"None of us are in Buffett's or Bettencourt's league," said the founder, Dieter 
Lehmkuhl, a retired doctor with assets of €1.5m (£1.3m). "We're a broad church 
– teachers, doctors, entrepreneurs. Most of our wealth is inherited. But we 
have more money than we need."

The group's manifesto claims Germany could raise €100bn (£88.5bn) if the 
richest paid a 5% wealth tax for two years.

On Monday, Lehmkuhl said he was renewing his call, first issued two years ago, 
to Merkel's government to rethink its taxation policies. Currently the richest 
Germans are taxed a maximum of 42%. The previous chancellor, Gerhard Schröder, 
lowered the top tax rate from the 53% ceiling set by his predecessor, Helmut 
Kohl.

"I would say to Merkel that the answer to sorting out Germany's financial 
problems, our public debt, is not to bring in cuts, which will 
disproportionately hit poorer people, but to tax the wealthy more," said 
Lehmkuhl. "We are always hearing about savings packages, but never tax rises. 
Yet tax increases are a way out of this mess. That's where the money is: rich 
people.

"Something needs to be done to stop the gap between rich and poor getting even 
bigger."

Under his group's plans, the new tax would only affect individuals with more 
than €500,000 in capital wealth. All money over that ceiling would initially be 
taxed at 5% for the first two years and thereafter at 1% or more.

Last week in France Nicolas Sarkozy proposed a similar idea: a temporary tax on 
the very rich. This would arrive in the form of an "exceptional contribution" 
of 3% on taxable earnings for those earning above €500,000. It will probably 
only last until 2013.

The initiative has been attacked as an empty stunt before it has even kicked in 
– even by some in his own party. The left deemed it a smokescreen to hide the 
fact that Sarkozy has given away billions of euros in tax breaks to the rich 
while this new measure will yield only €200m. Chantal Brunel, an MP for 
Sarkozy's own ruling rightwing UMP party, said that there must be higher 
permanent tax levels for "big fortunes" because "the rich must participate 
more".

In Italy too, one of the country's richest citizens has come forward to offer 
to pay more tax – but only if Silvio Berlusconi's government embarks on a 
wide-ranging programme of neo-liberal reform.

Luca di Montezemolo, the multimillionaire Ferrari chairman, made his offer in 
an interview with the centre-left daily La Repubblica earlier this month.

Montezemolo, 63, who has long been suspected of harbouring political ambitions, 
said he wanted to see the government raise cash by means of property sales and 
reductions in the perks of Italy's pampered politicians. "Then, but only then, 
a contribution on the part of members of the public is needed," he said. "You 
have to begin by asking it of those who have most, because it is scandalous 
that it should be asked of the middle class."

He said that even before the markets were swept this month by concern over 
Italy's giant public debt, he had proposed a surtax on annual incomes of 
between €5m and €10m. But it had met with a "deafening silence".

In Spain, the Socialist government is reported to be considering the 
reintroduction of a wealth tax scrapped just three years ago. Experts say the 
tax on assets, not including a first residence, would produce upwards of €1bn 
of revenue from just 50,000 rich individuals. Finance minister Elena Salgado is 
on record as saying she regrets the demise of the tax.

Alfredo Pérez Rublacaba, the new Socialist candidate for prime minister at the 
20 November general election in Spain, has already pledged to hike taxes on the 
rich if elected.

In the US, Buffett has been mocked for his admission in the New York Timesthis 
month that he felt bad about only paying $6.9m in tax last year, 17.4% of his 
taxable income, while his staff paid an average of 36%.

He suggested income and investment tax rates should be raised on those making 
more than $1m in taxable income– 0.2% of people who filed tax returns in 2009. 
The article attracted fierce criticism. "Warren Buffett, hypocrite," was the 
headline in the New York Post. "He cares more about shilling for President 
Obama – who's practically made socking 'millionaires and billionaires' his 
re-election theme song – than about kicking in more himself," the paper said.

Harvey Golub, former chief executive of American Express, told the Wall Street 
Journal: "Before you 'ask' for more tax money from me and others, raise the 
$2.2tn you already collect each year more fairly and spend it more wisely."

Additional reporting by Angelique Chrisafis, John Hooper, Giles Tremlett and 
Dominic Rushe


Squeeze the rich

A "squeeze the rich" tax increase in the UK is unlikely despite the fiscal 
sacrifices offered by moneyed citizens in the US, France and Germany. The 50p 
rate introduced by the Labour government is more likely to be scrapped in a few 
years' time rather than be raised. George Osborne said in his March budget that 
the 50p rate on taxable income greater than £150,000 per year would inflict 
"lasting damage" on the economy if it became permanent, laying the ground for 
its withdrawal in the medium term.

The Centre for Policy Studies, a centre-right thinktank, said there was a huge 
difference between generosity, as practised by Warren Buffett, and compulsory 
taxation. Tim Knox, director of the CPS, said: "In the UK there is little 
evidence that the 50p tax rate is bringing in extra revenues for the Treasury, 
while it arguably reduces growth by cutting incentives to one of the most 
entrepreneurial sectors of the economy. Thus, in the long term, higher taxes on 
the rich can hit the less well-off most because less wealth is being generated 
and put into the economy. So while the generosity and philanthropy of the 
super-rich should not be questioned, whether their good intentions will produce 
the desired effect is a completely different matter."

Len McCluskey, general secretary of the Unite union, said the public is being 
"softened up" for the abandonment of the 50p rate. "This government is 
impatient to ditch it because it believes wealth can be clasped by the few," he 
said.

Dan Milmo


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

Post message: [email protected]
Subscribe   :  [email protected]
Unsubscribe :  [email protected]
List owner  :  [email protected]
Homepage    :  http://proletar.8m.com/Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/proletar/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/proletar/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [email protected] 
    [email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Kirim email ke