http://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/opinion/2011/08/201182814172453998.html

West Papua: A history of exploitation 

West Papua was taken over by Indonesia in 1969, and a legacy of oppression and 
environmental devastation has followed.
NAJ Taylor Last Modified: 21 Sep 2011 20:29 
     
      The Grasberg mine has damaged surrounding river systems, such as the 
Ajikwa river above [West Papua Media] 


Investing in conflict-affected and high-risk areas is a growing concern for 
responsible businesses and investors. Companies based in developed countries 
often operate in lesser-developed foreign markets, where governance standards 
are lax, corruption is high and business practices are poor.


These pieces focus on one specific Anglo-Australian company and their American 
partner that jointly operate a mine in West Papua, one of the poorest provinces 
of Indonesia. The risks for the company include the potential to contribute to 
environmental and social damage in a foreign market. The risks for investors 
include financing a company that does not get its risk management right.

This is the second chapter of a four-part essay that examines how the Norwegian 
Pension Fund came to blacklist the mining giant Rio Tinto. The first part can 
be found here.

Part 2: A history of exploitation 

New Guinea, geographically as well as historically, is Australia's closest 
relative. Separated from the mainland during the last glacial period, the 
waters filled in what now separates them: about 152km of the Torres Strait. 

While Australia and New Guinea both have enviable mineral stores, economic and 
political exploitation has left the latter as home to many of the poorest 
people on Earth. New Guinea is also an island of two histories.

The eastern half forms the independent state of Papua New Guinea - a status it 
has enjoyed since breaking from Australia in 1975. With its natural resources 
of oil and industrial metals, Papua New Guinea has long been exploited for its 
minerals at places like Ok Tedi and Bougainville.

Both projects ended in social and environmental disaster. The environmental 
impact of Ok Tedi was so great that, in 1999, Paul Anderson, then chief 
executive of Australian mining company BHP, conceded that the mine was "not 
compatible with our environmental values". But it did serve the company's 
pursuit of profit. It was not until the Ok Tedi environmental disaster three 
years later that the true impact of BHP's mining practices came to the 
attention of the global public. BHP subsequently sold its interest, established 
a fund to restore the sustainable development of the affected people, and 
received immunity from further prosecution.

     
      BHP Billiton acknowledged that its mine at Ok Tedi was 'not compatible 
with our environmental values' [GALLO/GETTY]  
The western half of New Guinea has had a lesser-known but equally tragic 
history centred around the Jayawijaya Mountain, home to the Amungme, and 
farther downstream, the Kamoro people. As with much of East Asia, the indigenes 
were under Dutch rule when a geological expedition in 1936 located a 
significant ertsberg (ore mountain) deep in the southwestern highlands. World 
War II intervened, and the Japanese claimed Indonesia and some of the western 
parts of New Guinea.

Following defeat in the war, the Japanese were marshalled back to their home 
territory, and Dutch colonialism resumed. Importantly, when Indonesian 
independence was obtained from the Dutch in 1949, few knew of the ertsberg 
(mineral ore) hidden deep in West Papua's wilderness. 

The Dutch began a ten-year Papuanisation programme in 1957 that would see West 
Papua handed back to the indigenes, and would create the independent state of 
West Papua around 1972.

Despite multiple territorial claims, the ore mountain lay dormant for over 20 
years.

On March 6, 1959, the New York Times reported the presence of alluvial gold in 
the Arafura Sea just off the coast of West Papua. Reminded of their earlier 
discovery, Dutch geologists were said to be returning to the ore mountain, now 
simply known as Ertsberg.

Independence denied

The indigenes, meanwhile, as part of their programme toward independence, 
established a Papuan National Council and provisional government as well as 
their own military, police force, currency, national anthem, and flag. At the 
time, West Papua's independence was due before the United Nations 
Decolonisation Commission, and representatives took part in various cultural 
and political activities throughout the region. By December 1, 1961, the West 
Papuan "Morning Star" flag had been raised alongside the Dutch for the first 
time. Many assumed that independence was imminent.

Unbeknown to both the indigenes and the Dutch, US mining company 
Freeport-McMoRan Copper and Gold was negotiating directly with Suharto - at the 
time an Indonesian army general - for a small group of its experts to prospect 
this ore mountain. The path into West Papua through Suharto promised to be 
fruitful for Freeport, since its board was stacked with the Rockefeller's 
Indonesian oil interests who already were versed in the general's way of doing 
business. An exploration agreement was reached, and soon after a geologist from 
Freeport was forging his way through the wilderness toward Ertsberg.

West Papua was about to change hands again.

Armed with Chinese and Soviet weapons, as well as an increasingly public 
friendship with the communists, Indonesia declared war on the Netherlands. To 
protect Western interests from the threat of communism, on August 15, 1962, the 
United Nations and the United States orchestrated a meeting between Dutch and 
Indonesian officials during which interim control of West Papua was signed over 
to Indonesia.

Six years of UN interregnum followed, after which a plebiscite would decide 
whether to form a separate nation or integrate into Indonesia. All 815,000 West 
Papuans were to vote in an Act of Free Choice.

To ensure a favourable outcome, the Indonesians worked to suppress Papuan 
identity. Raising the West Papuan flag and singing of the national anthem were 
banned, and all political activities were deemed subversive. Indonesia ruled 
through force, for self-interest. Alarmed by ongoing media reports, on April 5, 
1967, in the British House of Lords, Lord Ogmore called for a UN investigation. 
By early 1968, with Suharto having assumed the presidency of Indonesia, a US 
consular visit almost unanimously agreed that "Indonesia could not win an open 
election" in West Papua.

West Papua still wanted its independence.

In a desperate attempt to secure West Papua's right to self-determination, two 
junior politicians crossed the border into Australian-administered Papua and 
New Guinea on May 29, 1969. They carried damning evidence of Indonesian 
repression; the hopes of a yet-unformed nation rested on the politicians 
reaching the UN. As Australia and its allies were amenable to Indonesian 
control of West Papua, the two were imprisoned upon crossing the border until 
after the referendum. Their brave plea was silenced.

Between July and August 1969, less than a quarter of one per cent of the 
population - some 1,026 West Papuans - signed the country's freedom over to 
Indonesia. The election, held under the aegis of the UN, was far from an act of 
free choice. The following day West Papua was declared a military operation 
zone, the local people's movement was restricted, and expression of their 
national identity banned under Indonesian law.

Poor, neglected West Papua.

Selling West Papua

Control of West Papua proved a lucrative business deal for the Indonesians. Two 
years prior to the Act of Free Choice - coincidentally on the same day the 
plight of Papua was raised in the House of Lords - Freeport signed a contract 
of work with the Suharto government entitling a jointly owned company, PT 
Freeport Indonesia (Freeport-Indonesia), full rights to the Ertsberg mine. In 
return, Indonesia would derive significant tax revenues and fees as well as a 
minority 9.36 per cent shareholding. Without the authority to do so, Indonesia 
nevertheless cut itself into a deal that sold large tracts of West Papua to the 
US company, intent on sifting it for copper and gold.

Although Ertsberg fulfilled its promise, as production slowed in the mid-1980s, 
Freeport-Indonesia began to explore surrounding mountains and ridges for other 
reserves. As is often the case, the best place to establish a new mine is next 
to another. Sure enough, significant copper and gold reserves were located at 
Grasberg only a couple of miles southwest of Ertsberg.

Grasberg has the largest recoverable reserves of copper and gold in the world. 
It's also Indonesia's economic beachhead.

Observing the Grasberg mine via Google Earth, one sees a scar like no other: 
Located about 13,000 feet (4,000 meters) above sea level, open-pit (above 
ground) mining has bored a hole through the top of the mountain more than half 
a mile (1 km) wide. What they're digging for is more than $40bn worth of copper 
and gold. Every day the operation discharges 230,000 tons of tailings (waste 
rock) into the Aghawagon River. This process is expected to continue for up to 
six more years, at which point exploration will go underground until there's no 
value left. Freeport estimates that will occur by 2041.

The operation is so large that it has shifted the borders of the adjacent 
Lorenz National Park. Listed as a World Heritage site by the UN's Educational, 
Scientific, and Cultural Organisation (UNESCO) in 1999, the park is "the only 
protected area in the world to incorporate a continuous, intact transect from 
snowcap to tropical marine environment, including extensive lowland wetlands". 
For the Amungme and Kamoro indigenes, corporate imperialism had replaced 
European colonialism.

The ramifications are both environmental and social.

'Slow-motion genocide'

The social and economic condition of the indigenous Amungme and Kamoro poses 
fundamental human rights concerns. Although Freeport-Indonesia directly or 
indirectly employs a large number of West Papuans and is regularly Indonesia's 
biggest taxpayer, in 2005, the World Bank found that Papua remained the poorest 
province in Indonesia. With a marked rise in military personnel and foreign 
staff has come a number of social issues, including alcohol abuse and 
prostitution such that Papua now has the highest rate of HIV/AIDS in Indonesia.

Indonesian control of West Papua has been characterised by the ongoing and 
disproportionate repression of largely peaceful opposition. Few sustained 
violent interactions have occurred; however, in one major conflict in 1977, 
more than 1,000 civilian men, women, and children were killed by the Indonesian 
military in Operasi Tumpas ("Operation Annihilation") after a slurry pipe was 
severed and partially closed the Ertsberg mine.

More recently, in 1995, the Australian Council for Overseas Aid reported that 
the Indonesian army and security forces killed 37 people involved in protests 
over the mine in the preceding seven-month period. While the level of violence 
is difficult to establish, academics at the Centre for Peace and Conflict 
Studies at the University of Sydney maintain that up to 100,000 West Papuans 
may have been killed since Indonesian occupation. They call what's happening to 
West Papua "slow-motion genocide".

      "Grasberg's reserves are so vast that extracting them is expected to 
create 6 billion tons of industrial waste."
     
There are also two primary environmental concerns over Grasberg. The first is 
that the mine discharges 230,000 tons of waste rock a day into surrounding 
waterways; given the escalating rate of processing, this rate is arguably above 
that allowed by national law. Secondly, acid rock drainage - the outflow of 
acidic water - has resulted from the disposal of a further 360,000 to 510,000 
tons a day of overburden and waste rock in two adjacent valleys covering 4 
miles (6.5 km), up to 975 feet (300 metres) deep. The mine operators dispute 
both claims.

Riverine methods of waste disposal are banned in every developed country on 
Earth. The World Bank no longer funds projects that operate this way, due to 
the irreversible ecological devastation, and the International Finance 
Corporation requires that rock be treated prior to disposal, which is not a 
practice carried out at Grasberg. Since the mid-1990s, a number of independent 
environmental assessments have found unacceptably high levels of toxicity and 
sediment as far as 140 miles away.

Freeport and Rio Tinto maintain that riverine tailings disposal is the best 
solution, given the difficult terrain, the threat of earthquakes, and heavy 
rainfall.

Grasberg's reserves are so vast that extracting them is expected to create 6 
billion tons of industrial waste.

President Suharto, who is now recognised as one of the most corrupt and 
tyrannical leaders in history, renewed Freeport-Indonesia's exclusive mining 
rights in 1991 for a further 30 years with an option of two 10-year extensions. 
The license included an option to prospect another 6.5 million acres (2.6 
million hectares), as far as the Papua New Guinea border. "The potential is 
only limited by the imagination," Freeport's chairman, James Moffett, remarked 
to shareholders in March 1995. "Every other mining company wants to get into 
Irian Jaya [West Papua]. Bougainville and Ok Tedi don't hold a candle to 
Grasberg."

Part 3 to follow next week.


This is an extract of a chapter from the book, Evolutions in Sustainable 
Investing: Strategies, Funds and Thought Leadership, to be published by Wiley 
in December 2011. 

NAJ Taylor is a PhD candidate in the School of Political Science and 
International Studies at the University of Queensland, and casual lecturer in 
the Faculty of Law and Management at La Trobe University.

Follow NAJ Taylor on Twitter: @najtaylordotcom

The views expressed in this article are the author's own and do not necessarily 
reflect Al Jazeera's editorial policy.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

Post message: [email protected]
Subscribe   :  [email protected]
Unsubscribe :  [email protected]
List owner  :  [email protected]
Homepage    :  http://proletar.8m.com/Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/proletar/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/proletar/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [email protected] 
    [email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Kirim email ke