On 28 Oct 08:28, Austin Cawley-Edwards wrote: > Hey Julien, > > Following up on if you've had time to think about how we can move forward > on one of these paths. I haven't been able to find any formal proposals for > the other recently merged SDs like Eureka besides this comment[1]. Would it > be valuable for us to work on something similar for envoy's xDS in the > meantime?
Let's be honest that recent service discoveries are 'small', and that big ones are quite old now. I still need to gather intel on xDS; but let's start by collecting data: - What would the configuration look like (does it need multiple `roles`) - Which meta labels could we have exposed - How would we set the address That hopefully should not be too much work and then we can see how/if we move forward with this. > > Thanks, > Austin > > [1]: > https://github.com/prometheus/prometheus/pull/3369#issuecomment-667344846 > > On Wednesday, October 21, 2020 at 6:49:59 PM UTC-4 Austin Cawley-Edwards > wrote: > > > That makes sense to me, and would be nice to build of an existing > > protocol, and agree it sounds like a large effort. I’m pretty new to xDS as > > well, though we have many people on the Kuma team who are quite > > knowledgeable — I’d be happy to set up a call/ bring them in to help size > > the work if you’d be open to that. > > > > And understand + agree on the configuration approach for the extra layer. > > The main difficulty for users is configuring the file_sd + sidecar, > > relabel_configs should be fairly straightforward and accessible. > > > > Austin > > > > On Wed, Oct 21, 2020 at 6:37 PM Julien Pivotto <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > >> On 21 Oct 15:12, Austin Cawley-Edwards wrote: > >> > Hey all, > >> > > >> > I've gathered up some research about our efforts with the DNS SD > >> option, > >> > please let me know if I've overlooked something. > >> > >> I have been looking on my side too - I think that what the option that's > >> more likely on the table would not to have a "generic" implementation, > >> but a xDS protocol service discovery. In that case, it would not be an > >> issue to have that in Prometheus (even the gRPC version). > >> > >> However, the extra layer that kuma is offering in the SD should be done > >> at the Prometheus configuration level - e.g. by the user, in the > >> relabel_configs. > >> > >> I think I'd like to better understand xDS but it seems that it could be > >> good option for a service discovery in Prometheus, at least at first > >> sight. > >> > >> We are looking at a huge amount of work here I think. > >> > >> -- > >> Julien Pivotto > >> @roidelapluie > >> > > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Prometheus Developers" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/prometheus-developers/89922987-42e4-4807-9956-5590cb2de558n%40googlegroups.com. -- Julien Pivotto @roidelapluie -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Prometheus Developers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/prometheus-developers/20201028170737.GA920029%40oxygen.
