On 05.10.23 17:48, Clément Jean wrote: > I'm not entirely sure yet because I'm new to contributing to prometheus. If > there is any use cases that you guys already discussed around Protobuf, I'd > be happy to help.
If you are really deep into protobuf, there is definitely one big and fat issue to solve: We are still using gogo-protobuf in prometheus/prometheus, which has good performance properties, but is unmaintained. The plan has been for a while to migrate to another protobuf implementation that performs similarly well. Here is the discussion on this mailing list: https://groups.google.com/g/prometheus-developers/c/uFWRyqZaQis/m/1OOGT7s5AwAJ And here is a branch that contains a PoC of migrating to the vitess protoc plugin: https://github.com/austince/prometheus/tree/feat/drop-gogo (Note that it is more than two years old, and I'm not sure if the vitess plugin performs well enough. But it could be a starting point.) -- Björn Rabenstein [PGP-ID] 0x851C3DA17D748D03 [email] bjo...@rabenste.in -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Prometheus Developers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to prometheus-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/prometheus-developers/ZS/SqHfCPP9Cag2m%40mail.rabenste.in.
