here is the chart for the last 6 hours for the metric: (the last metric is 
for 14:43 )

[image: Screenshot from 2020-05-11 00-58-58.png]


On Monday, May 11, 2020 at 12:43:21 AM UTC+4:30, Yashar Nesabian wrote:
>
> The other slaves have 2-3 seconds difference with the timestamp of these 
> metrics, and yes the 2:57pm UTC is almost correct (I don't know the exact 
> time) and using foo[24h] is not very informative right now because we still 
> have the previous metrics when the slaves were on netdata master number 1.
> I did another experiment, I downloaded the metric files again and ran the 
> command (date +%s) on the Prometheus server almost at the same time, 
> The metrics' timestamp was 1589141392868 and the server's timestamp 
> was  1589141393 So I think this is not the problem
>
> On Monday, May 11, 2020 at 12:19:23 AM UTC+4:30, Julius Volz wrote:
>>
>> [+CCing back prometheus-users, which I had accidentally removed]
>>
>> How similar are the others? The ones in your example are from this 
>> afternoon (2:57pm UTC), I guess that's when you downloaded the file for 
>> grepping first?
>>
>> A regular instant vector selector in PromQL (like just "foo") will only 
>> select data points up to 5 minutes into the past from the current 
>> evaluation timestamp. So the table view would not show samples for any 
>> series whose last sample is more than 5m into the past. You could try a 
>> range selector like "foo[24h]" on these to see if any historical data is 
>> returned (I would expect so).
>>
>> On Sun, May 10, 2020 at 9:37 PM Yashar Nesabian <[email protected]> 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Sure, here it is:
>>> if the second parameter is the timestamp, then yes that's the problem, 
>>> but I wonder how come other metrics are stored by the Prometheus server? 
>>> because they also have a similar timestamp
>>>
>>> grep -i "netdata_web_log_detailed_response_codes_total" 
>>> allmetrics\?format=prometheus_all_hosts\&source=as-collected.2 | grep -i 
>>> "abs"
>>> netdata_web_log_detailed_response_codes_total{chart="web_log_passenger_event.detailed_response_codes",family="responses",dimension="200",instance="abs-02.x.y.zabs"}
>>>  245453 1589122673736
>>> netdata_web_log_detailed_response_codes_total{chart="web_log_passenger_event.detailed_response_codes",family="responses",dimension="400",instance="abs-02.x.y.zabs"}
>>>  82 1589122673736
>>> netdata_web_log_detailed_response_codes_total{chart="web_log_passenger_event.detailed_response_codes",family="responses",dimension="401",instance="abs-02.x.y.zabs"}
>>>  6 1589122673736
>>> netdata_web_log_detailed_response_codes_total{chart="web_log_passenger_event.detailed_response_codes",family="responses",dimension="200",instance="abs-04.x.y.zabs"}
>>>  238105 1589122673017
>>> netdata_web_log_detailed_response_codes_total{chart="web_log_passenger_event.detailed_response_codes",family="responses",dimension="400",instance="abs-04.x.y.zabs"}
>>>  59 1589122673017
>>> netdata_web_log_detailed_response_codes_total{chart="web_log_passenger_event.detailed_response_codes",family="responses",dimension="401",instance="abs-04.x.y.zabs"}
>>>  3 1589122673017
>>> netdata_web_log_detailed_response_codes_total{chart="web_log_passenger_event.detailed_response_codes",family="responses",dimension="200",instance="abs-03.x.y.zabs"}
>>>  241708 1589122673090
>>> netdata_web_log_detailed_response_codes_total{chart="web_log_passenger_event.detailed_response_codes",family="responses",dimension="400",instance="abs-03.x.y.zabs"}
>>>  68 1589122673090
>>> netdata_web_log_detailed_response_codes_total{chart="web_log_passenger_event.detailed_response_codes",family="responses",dimension="401",instance="abs-03.x.y.zabs"}
>>>  5 1589122673090
>>> netdata_web_log_detailed_response_codes_total{chart="web_log_passenger_event.detailed_response_codes",family="responses",dimension="200",instance="abs-01.x.y.zabs"}
>>>  250296 1589122674872
>>> netdata_web_log_detailed_response_codes_total{chart="web_log_passenger_event.detailed_response_codes",family="responses",dimension="400",instance="abs-01.x.y.zabs"}
>>>  81 1589122674872
>>> netdata_web_log_detailed_response_codes_total{chart="web_log_passenger_event.detailed_response_codes",family="responses",dimension="401",instance="abs-01.x.y.zabs"}
>>>  7 1589122674872
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sun, May 10, 2020 at 10:36 PM Julius Volz <[email protected]> 
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hmm, odd. Could you share some of the lines that your grep finds in the 
>>>> metrics output of the correctly scraped target?
>>>>
>>>> The example at the top of 
>>>> https://github.com/netdata/netdata/issues/3891 suggests that Netdata 
>>>> sets client-side timestamps for samples (which is uncommon for Prometheus 
>>>> otherwise). Maybe those timestamps are too far in the past (more than 5 
>>>> minutes), so they would not be shown anymore?
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, May 10, 2020 at 6:51 PM Yashar Nesabian <[email protected]> 
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I have a job on the Prometheus which gathers metrics from 4 netdata 
>>>>> master servers. Here is the scenario I had:
>>>>> - on netdata master number 1, I gather metrics of  about 200 slaves
>>>>> - For some reason, I decided to move 12 slaves 
>>>>> (a1,a2,a3,a4,b1,b2,b3,b4,c1,c2,c3,c4) from the first netdata master to 
>>>>> the 
>>>>> second netdata master
>>>>> - Now I only see metrics from 8 servers on the Prometheus server 
>>>>> a1,a2,a3,a4,b1,b2,b3,b4) coming from the second master
>>>>> - I check the job status in the targets page and I see all 4 masters 
>>>>> are up and metrics are gathered successfully
>>>>> - Here is the URL which Prometheus uses to read the metrics from the 
>>>>> netdata master number 2: 
>>>>> http://172.16.76.152:19999/api/v1/allmetrics?format=prometheus_all_hosts
>>>>> - I grep the downloaded file with hosts metrics for the c1,c2,c3,c4 
>>>>> hosts and I see netdata is sending all the metrics relevant to these 
>>>>> slaves
>>>>> - But when I search for the metric in the Graph page, I don't see any 
>>>>> results:
>>>>>
>>>>> [image: Screenshot from 2020-05-10 20-58-27.png]
>>>>>
>>>>> all the servers' time is synced and are correct.
>>>>> here is the output of systemctl status prometheus:
>>>>>
>>>>> May 10 19:35:07 devops-mon-01 systemd[1]: Reloading Prometheus.
>>>>> May 10 19:35:07 devops-mon-01 prometheus[6076]: level=info 
>>>>> ts=2020-05-10T15:05:07.407Z caller=main.go:734 msg="Loading configuration 
>>>>> file" filename=/e
>>>>> tc/prometheus/prometheus.yml
>>>>> May 10 19:35:07 devops-mon-01 prometheus[6076]: level=info 
>>>>> ts=2020-05-10T15:05:07.416Z caller=main.go:762 msg="Completed loading of 
>>>>> configuration file
>>>>> " filename=/etc/prometheus/prometheus.yml
>>>>> May 10 19:35:07 devops-mon-01 systemd[1]: Reloaded Prometheus.
>>>>> May 10 19:53:22 devops-mon-01 prometheus[6076]: level=error 
>>>>> ts=2020-05-10T15:23:22.621Z caller=api.go:1347 component=web msg="error 
>>>>> writing response"
>>>>> bytesWritten=0 err="write tcp 172.16.77.50:9090->172.16.76.168:56778: 
>>>>> write: broken pipe"
>>>>> May 10 20:25:53 devops-mon-01 prometheus[6076]: level=error 
>>>>> ts=2020-05-10T15:55:53.058Z caller=api.go:1347 component=web msg="error 
>>>>> writing response"
>>>>> bytesWritten=0 err="write tcp 172.16.77.50:9090->172.16.76.168:41728: 
>>>>> write: broken pipe"
>>>>>
>>>>> 172.16.77.50 is our Prometheus server and 172.16.76.168 is our grafana 
>>>>> server so I think the last error is not related to my problem
>>>>>
>>>>> -- 
>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>>> Groups "Prometheus Users" group.
>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>>>> an email to [email protected].
>>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/prometheus-users/156d8c36-c1de-4ca3-8b2a-2cfbcb5895fc%40googlegroups.com
>>>>>  
>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/prometheus-users/156d8c36-c1de-4ca3-8b2a-2cfbcb5895fc%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>>> .
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -- 
>>>> Julius Volz
>>>> PromLabs - promlabs.com
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -- 
>>>
>>> *Best Regards*
>>>
>>> *Yashar Nesabian*
>>>
>>> *Senior Site Reliability Engineer*
>>>
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> Julius Volz
>> PromLabs - promlabs.com
>>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Prometheus Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/prometheus-users/75c2fc70-af2a-4d23-beb8-0682bb250437%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to