@Clark, We are still getting a number rather than a string. We have tried to get the total time in seconds but unable to find the exact solution.
Regards, Dhanunjaya Mitta On Thursday, October 14, 2021 at 8:40:32 AM UTC+2 Dhanunjaya Mitta wrote: > @Brian, I have checked this link and we are just following the same > mentioned in that section. I have raised a question in their slack channel > as well but i didn't get any response from them. Is there any alternative? > > Regards, > Dhanunjaya Mitta > > On Thursday, October 14, 2021 at 8:37:25 AM UTC+2 Dhanunjaya Mitta wrote: > >> @HaraId I have already tried with %s but it is just giving the seconds >> part of the whole time stamp. It is not returning the total time in seconds. >> >> On Wednesday, October 13, 2021 at 9:33:13 PM UTC+2 Harald Koch wrote: >> >>> On Wed, Oct 13, 2021, at 13:41, Brian Candler wrote: >>> >>> Googling for "argos workflow.creationTimestamp" finds >>> https://argoproj.github.io/argo-workflows/variables/ >>> >>> >>> *workflow.creationTimestampWorkflow creation timestamp formatted in RFC >>> 3339 (e.g. 2018-08-23T05:42:49Z)* >>> >>> >>> *workflow.creationTimestamp.<STRFTIMECHAR>* >>> *Creation timestamp formatted with a strftime >>> <http://strftime.org/> format character* >>> >>> >>> If they use a reasonably modern STRFTIME implementation, the "%s" format >>> directive returns seconds since the (1970) epoch. >>> >>> -- >>> Harald >>> >>> >>> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Prometheus Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to prometheus-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/prometheus-users/83bf3e0c-7737-4174-9e0d-f4ef012b3b05n%40googlegroups.com.
