Dear all,

Here is the text I referred to in my previous message, as a proposal for the 
text on this:

The OpenURC and AALOA initiatives, having been engaged in discussions about the 
scope of their proposed activities, agree that:

(1) As an initiative for the building of an open source accessibility 
framework, OpenURC will be primarily concerned with the promotion of 
personalised and accessible user interfaces. This involves discovery of devices 
and targets, and flexible deployment and management of adaptors.  The 
availability of suitable standards for device descriptions and user interface 
description will be of key importance.

(2)  As an initiative for the building an open source service framework, AALOA 
will be primarily concerned with support for ambient awareness and the flexible 
deployment and management of assisted living services. The availability of 
suitable standards allowing services to interact with ambient environments will 
be of key importance.

(3) Both initiatives consider standardisation important, and intend to use 
existing standards, and possibly contribute to their evolution, where possible. 
 Development of new standards is also within the scope of our activities.

(4) It is to our mutual benefit to plan that such features and specifications 
that are developed are compatible, so that OpenURC-based platforms can 
integrate AALOA components, and AALOA-based platforms can integrate 
OpenURC-based components.

(5) We will enter into discussions in order to work towards a common 
architecture.

Does this sum up the situation clearly and correctly?

JOE



On 3/11/2010 15:13 , "Antonio kung" <antonio.k...@trialog.com> wrote:

  Dear AALOA friends,


 We now have about two weeks before the Passau event


http://www.esl.fim.uni-passau.de/eurossc2010/program/program.html
 http://www.esl.fim.uni-passau.de/eurossc2010/monami.pdf

where the intention is to make available press releases announcing AALOA.

 This will be a joint event where a similar press release will be prepared for 
URC, and a joint statement will be made.
 We need to prepare first the AALOA press release. I can see the following 
actions:


 *   A: coming up with a first draft in English (action Francesco?)
 *   B: volonteers to translate the resulting press release into different 
languages (e.g. German - action Fraunhofer?, French - action Trialog, Italian - 
action CNR ...)
 *   C: contacting the technology press
    *   Germany first as some German journalist could attend the event. I guess 
Fraunhofer colleagues can help there and can take the lead
    *
    *   Other countries. The event will be videostreamed so other Journalist 
could attend the session
 *   D: preparing the Passau workshop. The idea is to make this announcement in 
the 17.20 - 17.55 slot
 *

I suggest a timetable where A is done this week, and B, C, D takes place next 
week. I will contact each of you individually to ensure that the action is well 
understood.

 Cheers

 Antonio Kung
 Technical coordinator MonAMI

 On 27/09/2010 10:02, Joe Gorman wrote:

Dear all,

I have read the proposed statements about URC/AALOA.

I support the idea that the tow organisations should seek to co-operate while 
at the same time each having their "own" field of activity.

However, I am a bit concerned that the existing wording is not clear enough.  I 
found I had to read it several times, and in the end was not quite sure where 
the boundaries would be.

Some specific issues:

1.  It says "URC will focus on....".  URC has existed for a long time, and a 
lot of people know it.
       When you use the word "will", as future tense, it raises a question 
about whether URC is now going to change direction.
      Is that the case?  I am not sure.

2.  Use of the word "focus".  I have learned that this word can sometimes be 
imprecise.  Does it mean "will spend most if its efforts
       working on - but still be allowed to do other things" (in the same way 
that when you "focus" on something in a photograph, the other
       elements are still visible, even if a bit fuzzy)  OR does it mean "will 
work on this and nothing else"?
       I feel unsure which is meant in the context of this message.

3.  Both say "it will rely on.... standards".   This may just be an issue of 
the use of English:  "rely" gives the strong impression that URC and AALOA will
      have to hope that other people develop then needed standards.  Is that 
what is meant?

So, even though the parties involved may have a clear idea what they mean, I 
fear that an "outsider" reading this will still be unsure of where the boundary 
is.

JOE





On 27/09/2010 01:07 , "Francesco Furfari" <francesco.furf...@isti.cnr.it> 
<mailto:francesco.furf...@isti.cnr.it>  wrote:

  Dear All,

 I have a question of interest for the temporary governing board of AALOA and 
all the promoters.
 I will call a vote on that, so I kindly ask all the promoters to read 
carefully the content of this message,
 and to post here any doubt about this operation. Below you find also my 
personal comments

 At the AAL Forum,  Antonio Kung, Stefano Chessa, me and Jan Alexandersson ( 
Head AAL Competence Center
 DFKI GmbH)   had an interesting discussion about a joint announcement to 
publish during the MonAMI workshop
 at the 5th European Conference on Smart Sensing and Context (14-16 Nov, 
Passau, Germany)

 You can read the story in the attached message, but for your convenience below 
there is the agreed statement
 ---------------------



(1) As an initiative for the building of an open source accessibility 
framework, OpenURC will focus on features for personalised and accessible user 
interfaces. This involves discovery of devices and targets, and flexible 
deployment and management of adaptors. It will rely on the specification of 
standards for device descriptions and user interface descriptions.

(2)  As an initiative for the building of an open source service framework, 
AALOA will focus on features for ambient awareness, and for the flexible 
deployment and management of assisted living services. It will rely on the 
specification of standards allowing services to interact with ambient 
environments.

 (3) Integrating each other contribution

The two initiatives see a potential for sharing developed features and 
specification so that OpenURC-based platforms can integrate AALOA components, 
and AALOA-based platforms can integrate OpenURC-based components.

 (4) Towards convergence

They further agree to undertake a discussion in order to work towards a common 
architecture.


-----------------
 We decided that the consequent actions of the parties  would have been:


 *   OpenURC to check (1)
 *   AALOA to check (2)
 *   All to check (3), (4)
 *   OpenURC to prepare a specific press release announcing its creation to the 
press
 *   AALOA to prepare a specific press release announcing its creation to the 
press
 *
 *   Make a press release for the joint announcement
 *
 *   Make sure that AALOA and OpenURC websites will include the 3 press 
releases and link to each other

 Thus this mail is to open the discussion about such common action  to do and 
any further collaboration with OpenURC community.

 Here a reference  about URC
 http://myurc.org/TR/urc-tech-primer
 URC stands for Universal Remote Console  Standards (ANSI/INCITS 389-2005 
through 393-2005).

 ----- my personal comments

 At the moment it may sound  strange  the wording : "AALOA components" in (3).
 In AALOA we don't have any reference to a common architecture yet.
 AALOA will grow initially as the aggregation of different projects, and a 
convergence process will be "somehow" created  in the long run. Nevertheless it 
is right to say that the purpose of AALOA is to compare the diverse solutions 
available, in this respect URC has to be taken into account and we can 
encourage its evaluation. However we may only advertise all the members of such 
initiative, any adoption or integration of URC standards in this moment is let 
to the autonomous decisions of single projects or individuals of AALOA. As 
member of universAAL project,  I can only anticipate you that further meetings 
will follow in the next months between universAAL members and OpenURC community.
 Of course it would advisable that an URC-based project was incubated in AALOA, 
it would increase the visibility of URC to all the member joining  AALOA. This 
is something I already suggested to Jan and that he will further discuss with 
URC members .
 Said that, aware of the limit of the announcement, I think it is useful to 
increase visibility of our actions and to confirm that  AALOA is working as 
catalyst of interesting initiatives.

 Best regards,
 Francesco



_______________________________________________
Promoters mailing list
Promoters@aaloa.org
http://aaloa.org/mailman/listinfo/promoters






_______________________________________________
Promoters mailing list
Promoters@aaloa.org
http://aaloa.org/mailman/listinfo/promoters

Reply via email to