> Now that you have mentioned it, we consider this pretty unoptimal and we > agreed on removing Coq from Debian due to the perils of shipping an > outdated version :( :(
I find it perfectly adequate for my needs, FWIW. And I'd be annoyed to have to install Coq manually. 2 years old sounds like a really weird definition of outdated to me. To take a "random" example, ProofGeneral tries to be compatible with Emacs-24.3 which is 5 years old. Stefan _______________________________________________ ProofGeneral-devel mailing list ProofGeneral-devel@inf.ed.ac.uk http://lists.inf.ed.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/proofgeneral-devel