Hey, Sorry, thanks for the reminder - I somehow missed the original and our patch tracker is down at the moment.
On Wed, 2 Oct 2019 at 10:22, JC Brand <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi guys, > > friendly reminder that I sent this patch in May and would appreciate some > feedback. > > Thanks > JC > > On Tue, May 07, 2019 at 04:45:12PM +0200, JC Brand wrote: > > Hi folks > > > > I need something like mod_muc_log but I need to log to Postgres, so I wrote > > a > > patch for mod_muc_log that does this by using the newer storage API. > > > > In order to do this, I copied liberally from mod_muc_mam. Is the high level goal that you just want MAM but without the client's ability to query it? Does it matter to you if the client /can/ query it? In other words, why not just use mod_muc_mam? Regards, Matthew -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "prosody-dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/prosody-dev/CAJt9-x7MBXQ%3Dv%3DJrG_mq596jXyci%3DFxXqeYU%2BVJ8sByxp3brRg%40mail.gmail.com.
