Mike,
        if your sheet symbols contain the correct file name for the
associated subsheet then you have no problem. Simply right click somewhere
in your Exlorer Pane, then click View, Refresh from the menus. This should
rearrange the subsheets under the main top sheet. Typically if all the
subsheets are correctly referenced by the top sheet, closing and then
reopening the file will also accomplish this same function as it scans in
the documents upon reopening.

Brad Velander,
Lead PCB Designer,
Norsat International Inc.,
#300 - 4401 Still Creek Dr.,
Burnaby, B.C., V5C 6G9.
Tel. (604) 292-9089 direct
Fax (604) 292-9010
website www.norsat.com


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Robison Michael R CNIN [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, August 13, 2001 7:13 AM
> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: [PEDA] multipage schematic question
> 
> 
> hello,
> 
> i've only done a couple multi-sheet schematics and its been a while.
> the last few boards have been simple two-sided reworks of old boards
> and i didn't do a schematic for them... just the pcb.
> 
> anyway, i created tmod_main.sch and put the sheet symbols for all
> the pages and then went thru and created sheets from the symbols
> and all looks well.
> 
> but what makes me nervous is that in the last multi-sheet schematic,
> in the explorer window the sub-sheets appear as an expansion of the
> main, whereas in my new one they are sitting on the same level as
> the main.  i'm worried that they might not be properly associated to
> the main.
> 
> any comments would be appreciated.
> 
> thank you, miker

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* To post a message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* To leave this list visit:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/leave.html
*                      - or email -
* mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?body=leave%20proteledaforum
*
* Contact the list manager:
* mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* Browse or Search previous postings:
* http://www.mail-archive.com/proteledaforum@techservinc.com
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Reply via email to