Brad,

Excellent point. I am using Cypress CY7C144 68-pin PLCC which I know the
numbering of, but I don't know how the IC  socket changes the single row
into the dual row pattern. I will have to get the socket to find out.

Thank You!
Jeff

-----Original Message-----
From: Brad Velander [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 1:36 PM
To: 'Protel EDA Forum'
Subject: Re: [PEDA] Mill-Max PLCC68 socket 940-99-068-24-000000


Jeff,
        here is my thought. Isn't the answer to that question dependant on
the device that you plug into it? If you plug in a device and it is numbered
A/B/C/D, does it make sense that the mating Mill-Max connector pins might be
numbered W/X/Y/Z? If they aren't numbered the same then you need some form
of table to note the cross connections. If you are inserting more then one
device type and they are pin numbered differently, then you are hooped and
you need cross reference tool of some sort somewhere.

Brad Velander,
Lead PCB Designer,
Norsat International Inc.,
#300 - 4401 Still Creek Dr.,
Burnaby, B.C., V5C 6G9.
Tel. (604) 292-9089 direct
Fax (604) 292-9010
website www.norsat.com


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jeff Adolphs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 10:13 AM
> To: Protel EDA Forum (E-mail)
> Subject: [PEDA] Mill-Max PLCC68 socket 940-99-068-24-000000
> 
> 
> Good Day! Anyone know the pin numbering of Mill-Max PLCC68 socket
> 940-99-068-24-000000 ?
> The Mill-Max PCB Layout does not show the pin numbering and I 
> do not have a
> sample part.
> 
> Have a good weekend!
> 
> Regards,
> Jeff Adolphs
> Lake Shore Cryotronics, Inc.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* To post a message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* To leave this list visit:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/leave.html
*
* Contact the list manager:
* mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* Forum Guidelines Rules:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/forumrules.html
*
* Browse or Search previous postings:
* http://www.mail-archive.com/proteledaforum@techservinc.com
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Reply via email to