That sounds about right to me, thanks 

Wayne Bickers

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Stephen Smith [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, 15 November 2001 9:52 a.m.
> To:   Protel EDA Forum
> Subject:      Re: [PEDA] None
> 
> I use to get this a long while ago, when I was learning to use Protel,
> if I can remember correctly, it is something to do with the connection
> of that pin on the schematic.
> The Node is the actual connection between the net and the pin.
> Either, the wire is not actually snapping to the pin correctly, or there
> is something wrong with the components pin in the library, or one of the
> pins on that net is not actually connected, or you could have palced a
> line, by mistake, instead of a wire.
> 
> I can't remember if that exactly what I used to do, but I think its
> along those lines.
> 
> Steve
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Wayne Bickers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 14 November 2001 20:47
> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: [PEDA] None
> 
> 
> Hi all, I am in the process of taking a schematic to a PCB, using the
> update
> PCB function, I am getting an error as below
> 
> Macro 1: New Node
> Add node FS1-2 to net NetFS1_2
> Error: Node not found
> 
> I usually get rid of this by playing around with the part schematic and
> land
> pattern but this time I cannot seem to get rid of it. Part of my problem
> is
> I dont know what this is really saying. Is it saying that pin 2 of FS1
> cannot match to the pin 2 of the land pattern?????
> 
> Any help greatly appreciated;
> 
> Wayne Bickers
> Electronic Engineer
> Tru-Test Limited

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* To post a message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* To leave this list visit:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/leave.html
*
* Contact the list manager:
* mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* Forum Guidelines Rules:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/forumrules.html
*
* Browse or Search previous postings:
* http://www.mail-archive.com/proteledaforum@techservinc.com
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Reply via email to