[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> Note that the efficiency of the stacking is not necessarily what the grocery
> boy was aiming for. The grocery boy would no doubt be aiming for optimum
> stability of the stack, not optimum efficiency of the stack. The fact that
> in this instance the most stable stacking method is also the most efficient
> in terms of space is neither here nor there to either problem.

We're getting pretty far off topic here, but in fact, the greatest stability is

when the stored energy is minimized, which DOES correlate to efficiency
of space occupied.

Jon

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* To post a message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* To leave this list visit:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/leave.html
*
* Contact the list manager:
* mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* Forum Guidelines Rules:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/forumrules.html
*
* Browse or Search previous postings:
* http://www.mail-archive.com/proteledaforum@techservinc.com
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Reply via email to