How about turning the problem round?

What ever match, boolean or wildcard rules you add to your server, somebody
will find
somthing that is wrong with it.

As it is, it probably works for most of the people that want to use it. (I'm
going to try it
myself at some point.)

Perhaps its a better idea to create an SQL hook into the protel database?
That way
ANY program can interact with ANY field in protel in either direction, using
whatever rules the
source (or destination) application wants.

I see the following...


So, there are two components to create.

What do you think?


-----Original Message-----
From: Ian Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 02 May 2002 09:45
To: Protel EDA Forum
Subject: Re: [PEDA] CSExtractFromExcel Server @ Ian Wilson

On 10:16 AM 2/05/2002 +0200, Schmitt Michael said:
>Hello Ian,
>i had just looked into your server and it looks like that what i was
>searching but i cannot use it as it is.
>the reason ist simple. as far as i understand your server it does only
>ONE object in the schemtic with ONE object in the excel spreadsheet.
>but i need to check :
>1. is the footprint like 0805 the same
>2. is the value (parttype) 10k the same
>then if, and only if, both fields are matched i need to copy the stuff from
>the selected colums to the fileds in the schematic.


I'll think about it.

The server is really designed to facilitate the import into the sch of all 
the fields based on a company part number that is either entered at Sch 
design time into a part field or at Sch Lib design time into a read-only 
(library) field.  There is a possible problem with extending the search 
across multiple fields - it may complicate the access into Excel slightly.

I have three ways of going here:
1) add one or two possible match fields
2) be very general and allow the user to add as many match fields as they
3) say tough luck - it does what it does.

1) is probably simple enough but no doubt someone will find a limitation 
with it. 2) is more time to program. 3) is not really like me so, as I 
said, I will think about it.  The extra money I would get from an extension 
like this is very unlikely to cover my time in doing it but I will consider 
it.  (These servers are by no means big money spinners, more a loss-making 
hobby that others may find useful.)

Anyone else with a desire to be able to fill in all the Sch part attributes 
from an external source, where there is matching required on more than one 
How many matches would suffice?

Ian Wilson

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* To post a message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
* To leave this list visit:
* Contact the list manager:
* Forum Guidelines Rules:
* Browse or Search previous postings:
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Reply via email to