I second Steve's comment and would only add that including a "." in a net
name could further the risk.
I would have called this net  something like V1_8 or  P1_8V.

In general and as a rule I never use any of the following in a net name or
ref des
!  @  $  %  ^  &  *  (  )  -  +  =  |  \  }  ]  { [  "  '  :  ;  <  >  .  ,
?  /

Dave Lewis

>For what it's worth, I'd _never_ call a net "1.8". That's far too likely
to trip up
>broken software, either in Protel or in external packages. It's also
annoying if
>you want to use it as a net label, as the auto-incrementer wil "helpfully"
make
>the next one "1.9", which isn't normally what you want. I'd use "VDD_1.8V"
or
>"VDD_CORE", which stays valid even when the process changes and the
>voltage needs to be lower.
>Steve Wiseman








************************************************************************
* Tracking #: AF63551339C3324089B26BD3C3C5FB2CDA3224B9
*
************************************************************************

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* To post a message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* To leave this list visit:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/leave.html
*
* Contact the list manager:
* mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* Forum Guidelines Rules:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/forumrules.html
*
* Browse or Search previous postings:
* http://www.mail-archive.com/proteledaforum@techservinc.com
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Reply via email to