I second Steve's comment and would only add that including a "." in a net
name could further the risk.
I would have called this net something like V1_8 or P1_8V.
In general and as a rule I never use any of the following in a net name or
ref des
! @ $ % ^ & * ( ) - + = | \ } ] { [ " ' : ; < > . ,
? /
Dave Lewis
>For what it's worth, I'd _never_ call a net "1.8". That's far too likely
to trip up
>broken software, either in Protel or in external packages. It's also
annoying if
>you want to use it as a net label, as the auto-incrementer wil "helpfully"
make
>the next one "1.9", which isn't normally what you want. I'd use "VDD_1.8V"
or
>"VDD_CORE", which stays valid even when the process changes and the
>voltage needs to be lower.
>Steve Wiseman
************************************************************************
* Tracking #: AF63551339C3324089B26BD3C3C5FB2CDA3224B9
*
************************************************************************
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* To post a message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* To leave this list visit:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/leave.html
*
* Contact the list manager:
* mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* Forum Guidelines Rules:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/forumrules.html
*
* Browse or Search previous postings:
* http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
